{"title":"Vancomycin bioanalysis for TDM services by using immunoassay and HPLC: A scoping review","authors":"V. Ningrum, Senya Puteri Amalia, Ari Wibowo","doi":"10.46542/pe.2024.243.197203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Administration of vancomycin in treating infections caused by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) requires therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The immunoassay method and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) are the two methods of choice for examining vancomycin levels, with their respective advantages.\nObjective: This study aims to review the validity of immunoassay and HPLC methods, as well as consider which method is appropriate, effective, and efficient for TDM in the clinical setting.\nMethod: Related articles were searched for using the keywords \"immunoassay\", \"vancomycin\", \"HPLC\", \"bioanalysis\", and \"human\" in the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct databases.\nResult: A total of 20 publications examined immunoassays, whereas 23 articles covered HPLC. Both the immunoassay and HPLC methods provided acceptable bioanalytical validation values.\nConclusion: The immunoassay method is an option for routine sample analysis that requires fast results, but this method is not recommended for patients with high immunoglobulin levels. The HPLC method is a choice because it offers better selectivity and sensitivity.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"13 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2024.243.197203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Administration of vancomycin in treating infections caused by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) requires therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The immunoassay method and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) are the two methods of choice for examining vancomycin levels, with their respective advantages.
Objective: This study aims to review the validity of immunoassay and HPLC methods, as well as consider which method is appropriate, effective, and efficient for TDM in the clinical setting.
Method: Related articles were searched for using the keywords "immunoassay", "vancomycin", "HPLC", "bioanalysis", and "human" in the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct databases.
Result: A total of 20 publications examined immunoassays, whereas 23 articles covered HPLC. Both the immunoassay and HPLC methods provided acceptable bioanalytical validation values.
Conclusion: The immunoassay method is an option for routine sample analysis that requires fast results, but this method is not recommended for patients with high immunoglobulin levels. The HPLC method is a choice because it offers better selectivity and sensitivity.