Vancomycin bioanalysis for TDM services by using immunoassay and HPLC: A scoping review

Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.46542/pe.2024.243.197203
V. Ningrum, Senya Puteri Amalia, Ari Wibowo
{"title":"Vancomycin bioanalysis for TDM services by using immunoassay and HPLC: A scoping review","authors":"V. Ningrum, Senya Puteri Amalia, Ari Wibowo","doi":"10.46542/pe.2024.243.197203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Administration of vancomycin in treating infections caused by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) requires therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The immunoassay method and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) are the two methods of choice for examining vancomycin levels, with their respective advantages.\nObjective: This study aims to review the validity of immunoassay and HPLC methods, as well as consider which method is appropriate, effective, and efficient for TDM in the clinical setting.\nMethod: Related articles were searched for using the keywords \"immunoassay\", \"vancomycin\", \"HPLC\", \"bioanalysis\", and \"human\" in the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct databases.\nResult: A total of 20 publications examined immunoassays, whereas 23 articles covered HPLC. Both the immunoassay and HPLC methods provided acceptable bioanalytical validation values.\nConclusion: The immunoassay method is an option for routine sample analysis that requires fast results, but this method is not recommended for patients with high immunoglobulin levels. The HPLC method is a choice because it offers better selectivity and sensitivity.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"13 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2024.243.197203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Administration of vancomycin in treating infections caused by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) requires therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The immunoassay method and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) are the two methods of choice for examining vancomycin levels, with their respective advantages. Objective: This study aims to review the validity of immunoassay and HPLC methods, as well as consider which method is appropriate, effective, and efficient for TDM in the clinical setting. Method: Related articles were searched for using the keywords "immunoassay", "vancomycin", "HPLC", "bioanalysis", and "human" in the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct databases. Result: A total of 20 publications examined immunoassays, whereas 23 articles covered HPLC. Both the immunoassay and HPLC methods provided acceptable bioanalytical validation values. Conclusion: The immunoassay method is an option for routine sample analysis that requires fast results, but this method is not recommended for patients with high immunoglobulin levels. The HPLC method is a choice because it offers better selectivity and sensitivity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
利用免疫测定和高效液相色谱法对万古霉素进行生物分析,以提供 TDM 服务:范围审查
背景:使用万古霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)引起的感染需要进行治疗药物监测(TDM)。免疫测定法和高效液相色谱法(HPLC)是检测万古霉素水平的两种首选方法,各有优势:本研究旨在回顾免疫测定法和高效液相色谱法的有效性,并考虑哪种方法适合、有效且高效地用于临床环境中的 TDM:在 PubMed、Google Scholar 和 Science Direct 数据库中以 "免疫测定"、"万古霉素"、"高效液相色谱"、"生物分析 "和 "人类 "为关键词搜索相关文章:结果:共有 20 篇文章研究了免疫测定,23 篇文章研究了高效液相色谱。免疫测定法和高效液相色谱法都提供了可接受的生物分析验证值:免疫测定法是需要快速得出结果的常规样本分析的一种选择,但不建议免疫球蛋白水平较高的患者使用这种方法。高效液相色谱法具有更好的选择性和灵敏度,可作为一种选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1