Human resources development: Evaluating perceptions against policy

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Evaluation and Program Planning Pub Date : 2024-05-11 DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102437
Julita Majczyk , Przemysław Dubel
{"title":"Human resources development: Evaluating perceptions against policy","authors":"Julita Majczyk ,&nbsp;Przemysław Dubel","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective of sustaining smart, sustainable and cohesive inclusive growth, framed by the European strategy, is in line with the global commitments of the Sustainable Development Goals. Thus, an analysis of people’s attitudes towards social policy and perceptions of professional development in Poland against European development policy is crucial. The nationwide representative sample included 1000 respondents aged 18–64. The study used principal component analysis (PCA), an approach for the multi-response optimisation. The results indicate that respondents’ evaluations are in line with the direction of EU labour policy, where their decisions correspond to the planned priorities oriented towards inclusion and cohesion. The PCA analysis showed that employee competencies and priorities for individual standing can be considered strongly correlated. Competencies were also found to be important for the platform to support systemic development. However, the items included in the analysis that are beyond the scope of the ESF+ , although even correlated, are of lesser importance. The research results allow to expand knowledge on the perception of the development policy facets promoted by the EU, supplemented by themes of leadership or immigrants. The study may become a starting point for inclusive and cohesive working climate research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 102437"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of sustaining smart, sustainable and cohesive inclusive growth, framed by the European strategy, is in line with the global commitments of the Sustainable Development Goals. Thus, an analysis of people’s attitudes towards social policy and perceptions of professional development in Poland against European development policy is crucial. The nationwide representative sample included 1000 respondents aged 18–64. The study used principal component analysis (PCA), an approach for the multi-response optimisation. The results indicate that respondents’ evaluations are in line with the direction of EU labour policy, where their decisions correspond to the planned priorities oriented towards inclusion and cohesion. The PCA analysis showed that employee competencies and priorities for individual standing can be considered strongly correlated. Competencies were also found to be important for the platform to support systemic development. However, the items included in the analysis that are beyond the scope of the ESF+ , although even correlated, are of lesser importance. The research results allow to expand knowledge on the perception of the development policy facets promoted by the EU, supplemented by themes of leadership or immigrants. The study may become a starting point for inclusive and cohesive working climate research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人力资源开发:根据政策评估看法
欧洲战略所确定的保持明智、可持续和有凝聚力的包容性增长的目标与可持续发展目标的全球承诺是一致的。因此,对照欧洲发展政策,分析波兰人民对社会政策的态度和对职业发展的看法至关重要。具有全国代表性的样本包括 1000 名年龄在 18-64 岁之间的受访者。研究采用了主成分分析法(PCA),这是一种多反应优化方法。结果表明,受访者的评价与欧盟劳动政策的方向一致,他们的决定符合以包容性和凝聚力为导向的计划优先事项。PCA 分析表明,员工的能力与个人地位的优先事项密切相关。此外,还发现能力对于支持系统发展的平台也很重要。然而,分析中包含的超出 ESF+ 范围的项目虽然也有相关性,但重要性较低。研究结果有助于扩大对欧盟所倡导的发展政策方面的认识,并以领导力或移民主题作为补充。这项研究可能成为包容性和凝聚性工作氛围研究的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
期刊最新文献
Overview of rural credit environment in China: Measurement logic, evaluation system, and case analysis Using social research and development methods in artist-mediated workshops with Myanmar refugee women to design a culturally responsive community resettlement center Uses of the viable validity concept: A systematic scoping review Analyzing the impact of the new educational policy 2020: A comprehensive review of India's educational reforms A deep dive into the factors affecting household solar photovoltaic adoption: An extended perspective of the value-based adoption model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1