A comparative study of 0.4% ripasudil, 0.02% netarsudil, and 0.5% timolol in combination with 0.005% latanoprost in the medical management of primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

Tirupati Nath, Snigdha Sen, Himanshu Kumar Yadav, Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Dr. Dinesh Kumar, Junior Yadav, Resident
{"title":"A comparative study of 0.4% ripasudil, 0.02% netarsudil, and 0.5% timolol in combination with 0.005% latanoprost in the medical management of primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension","authors":"Tirupati Nath, Snigdha Sen, Himanshu Kumar Yadav, Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Dr. Dinesh Kumar, Junior Yadav, Resident","doi":"10.3126/ajms.v15i5.62756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Globally, it is expected that 111 million people will have glaucoma by 2040. Intraocular pressure (IOP) is the most crucial clinical risk factor for glaucoma onset and/or progression.\nAims and Objectives: The aim of the study is to compare 0.4% ripasudil, 0.02% netarsudil, and 0.5% timolol in combination with 0.005% latanoprost in the medical management of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT).\nMaterials and Methods: The prospective randomized clinical study was conducted on patients with mild-to-moderate POAG or OHT on a single prostaglandin analog (e.g., latanoprost) not achieving target IOP. Patients with narrow-angle glaucoma, any ocular surgery, and advanced glaucoma were excluded from the study. Patients were followed up at 15 days, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months for a complete ophthalmic examination.\nResults: The maximum number of patients showed 41–60 years of age group. The male–female ratio was 1.8:1. A mild-to-moderate adverse event in the form of conjunctival hyperemia was seen in all groups. The mean reduction in IOP (mmHg) from baseline to 3 months in Groups A, B, and C is 5.7±0.923, 7.11±0.832, and 6.83±0.707 mmHg, respectively.\nConclusion: When given in combination with 0.005% latanoprost and comparing IOP reduction in terms of efficacy, 0.4% ripasudil and 0.02% netarsudil are almost similar, but ripasudil was well tolerated and showed minimal ocular adverse effects; hence, ripasudil is better in comparison to netarsudil.","PeriodicalId":8522,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"189 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v15i5.62756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Globally, it is expected that 111 million people will have glaucoma by 2040. Intraocular pressure (IOP) is the most crucial clinical risk factor for glaucoma onset and/or progression. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study is to compare 0.4% ripasudil, 0.02% netarsudil, and 0.5% timolol in combination with 0.005% latanoprost in the medical management of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). Materials and Methods: The prospective randomized clinical study was conducted on patients with mild-to-moderate POAG or OHT on a single prostaglandin analog (e.g., latanoprost) not achieving target IOP. Patients with narrow-angle glaucoma, any ocular surgery, and advanced glaucoma were excluded from the study. Patients were followed up at 15 days, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months for a complete ophthalmic examination. Results: The maximum number of patients showed 41–60 years of age group. The male–female ratio was 1.8:1. A mild-to-moderate adverse event in the form of conjunctival hyperemia was seen in all groups. The mean reduction in IOP (mmHg) from baseline to 3 months in Groups A, B, and C is 5.7±0.923, 7.11±0.832, and 6.83±0.707 mmHg, respectively. Conclusion: When given in combination with 0.005% latanoprost and comparing IOP reduction in terms of efficacy, 0.4% ripasudil and 0.02% netarsudil are almost similar, but ripasudil was well tolerated and showed minimal ocular adverse effects; hence, ripasudil is better in comparison to netarsudil.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
0.4% 利帕苏地、0.02% 奈达苏地和 0.5% 噻吗洛尔联合 0.005% 拉坦前列腺素治疗原发性开角型青光眼或眼压过高的比较研究
背景:预计到 2040 年,全球将有 1.11 亿人罹患青光眼。眼压(IOP)是青光眼发病和/或进展的最关键临床风险因素:该研究旨在比较 0.4% 利帕地尔、0.02% 尼泊舒地尔和 0.5% 噻吗洛尔联合 0.005% 拉坦前列素治疗原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)或眼压过高(OHT)的疗效:该前瞻性随机临床研究针对使用单一前列腺素类似物(如拉坦前列素)但未达到目标眼压的轻度至中度 POAG 或 OHT 患者。患有窄角青光眼、接受过任何眼科手术以及晚期青光眼的患者不在研究范围内。分别在 15 天、1 个月、2 个月和 3 个月对患者进行随访,以进行全面的眼科检查:结果:41-60 岁年龄段的患者最多。男女比例为 1.8:1。所有组别均出现结膜充血的轻中度不良反应。A组、B组和C组从基线到3个月的平均眼压降幅(毫米汞柱)分别为(5.7±0.923)、(7.11±0.832)和(6.83±0.707)毫米汞柱:在与0.005%拉坦前列素联合用药并比较降低眼压的疗效时,0.4%利帕苏地与0.02%奈达苏地几乎相似,但利帕苏地的耐受性好,眼部不良反应小;因此,利帕苏地优于奈达苏地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A comparative study of efficacy of intravenous dexmedetomidine with perineural dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block in upper limb surgery Efficacy and safety of low-dose celecoxib with chemoradiation in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma Comparison between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intra renal surgery for the management of lower calyceal calculi of size less than 1.5 cm : Our institutional experience A study on clinicoradiological profile of patients with hydropneumothorax in a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India Role of low-dose deflazacort with tamsulosin versus tamsulosin alone for medical expulsive therapy of ureteric stone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1