Variations in Perioperative Thromboprophylaxis Practices: Do the Guidelines Need a Closer Look?

{"title":"Variations in Perioperative Thromboprophylaxis Practices: Do the Guidelines Need a Closer Look?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.atssr.2024.04.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In 2022, the American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) published joint guidelines regarding the timing, duration, and choice of agent for perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for thoracic cancer patients. Now, 1 year after their release, we looked to assess practices and general adherence to these recommendations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a survey among board-certified/board-eligible thoracic surgeons in the United States, between July and October 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 103 board-certified thoracic surgeons responded to the survey. Over half of the surgeons reported using preoperative chemical thromboprophylaxis routinely for lobectomy/sublobar resections (56.3%), pneumonectomy/extended lung resections (64.1%), and esophagectomy (67%). Over two thirds of thoracic surgeons limited the duration of postoperative chemical thromboprophylaxis to the patient’s length of hospital stay and never administered chemoprophylaxis post-discharge. Among surgeons who always continued chemical thromboprophylaxis post-discharge, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was the most commonly used agent (&gt;70%), followed by direct oral anticoagulants (13.8%-16.7%). Only 33.3% of surgeons prescribing post-discharge chemical thromboprophylaxis after lobectomy/sublobar resections continued prophylaxis up to 4 weeks postoperatively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Contrary to the 2022 joint AATS/ESTS guidelines, the majority of surveyed thoracic surgeons in the United States do not routinely prescribe postoperative thromboprophylaxis after lung and esophageal cancer resections. The dogma of routine extended thromboprophylaxis must be reevaluated as modern minimally invasive thoracic surgery allows for very earlier ambulation and enhanced recovery. There is a need for randomized controlled trials exploring the utility of extended thromboprophylaxis and newer agents such as direct oral anticoagulants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72234,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124001955/pdfft?md5=84ea810af1add8e997daf3f11611478c&pid=1-s2.0-S2772993124001955-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124001955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In 2022, the American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) published joint guidelines regarding the timing, duration, and choice of agent for perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for thoracic cancer patients. Now, 1 year after their release, we looked to assess practices and general adherence to these recommendations.

Methods

We conducted a survey among board-certified/board-eligible thoracic surgeons in the United States, between July and October 2023.

Results

A total of 103 board-certified thoracic surgeons responded to the survey. Over half of the surgeons reported using preoperative chemical thromboprophylaxis routinely for lobectomy/sublobar resections (56.3%), pneumonectomy/extended lung resections (64.1%), and esophagectomy (67%). Over two thirds of thoracic surgeons limited the duration of postoperative chemical thromboprophylaxis to the patient’s length of hospital stay and never administered chemoprophylaxis post-discharge. Among surgeons who always continued chemical thromboprophylaxis post-discharge, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was the most commonly used agent (>70%), followed by direct oral anticoagulants (13.8%-16.7%). Only 33.3% of surgeons prescribing post-discharge chemical thromboprophylaxis after lobectomy/sublobar resections continued prophylaxis up to 4 weeks postoperatively.

Conclusions

Contrary to the 2022 joint AATS/ESTS guidelines, the majority of surveyed thoracic surgeons in the United States do not routinely prescribe postoperative thromboprophylaxis after lung and esophageal cancer resections. The dogma of routine extended thromboprophylaxis must be reevaluated as modern minimally invasive thoracic surgery allows for very earlier ambulation and enhanced recovery. There is a need for randomized controlled trials exploring the utility of extended thromboprophylaxis and newer agents such as direct oral anticoagulants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围手术期血栓预防措施的差异:指南是否需要仔细研究?
背景2022年,美国胸外科协会(AATS)和欧洲胸外科医师协会(ESTS)发布了关于胸外科癌症患者围手术期静脉血栓栓塞预防的时间、持续时间和药物选择的联合指南。现在,在指南发布 1 年后,我们希望对这些建议的实践和总体遵守情况进行评估。方法我们在 2023 年 7 月至 10 月期间对美国获得医学会认证/有资格获得医学会认证的胸外科医生进行了一项调查。超过半数的外科医生表示,在肺叶切除术/肺下叶切除术(56.3%)、肺切除术/肺扩大切除术(64.1%)和食管切除术(67%)中常规使用术前化学血栓预防措施。超过三分之二的胸外科医生将术后化学血栓预防措施的持续时间限制在患者的住院时间内,并且从未在患者出院后实施化学预防措施。在出院后始终坚持化学血栓预防的外科医生中,低分子量肝素(LMWH)是最常用的药物(70%),其次是直接口服抗凝剂(13.8%-16.7%)。结论与 2022 年 AATS/ESTS 联合指南相反,在美国接受调查的胸外科医生中,大多数人在肺癌和食管癌切除术后不按常规处方进行术后血栓预防。由于现代胸腔镜微创手术可以更早下床活动并促进恢复,因此必须重新评估常规延长血栓预防的教条。有必要进行随机对照试验,探索延长血栓预防措施和更新药物(如直接口服抗凝剂)的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 days
期刊最新文献
Erratum Contents Perceptions of Frailty and Prehabilitation Among Thoracic Surgeons: Findings From a National Survey Pulmonary Artery Vasa Vasorum Damage in Severe COVID-19–Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis Single-Stage Surgical Approach to Aortoesophageal Fistula After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1