Donor Perceptions and Preferences of Telemedicine and In-Person Visits for Living Kidney Donor Evaluation

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Kidney International Reports Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ekir.2024.05.009
{"title":"Donor Perceptions and Preferences of Telemedicine and In-Person Visits for Living Kidney Donor Evaluation","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ekir.2024.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Living kidney donor evaluation is a lengthy and complex process requiring in-person visits. Access to transplant centers, travel costs, lost wages, and dependent care arrangements are barriers to willing donors initiating evaluation. Telemedicine can help streamline and epedite the evaluation process. We aimed to deeply understand donor experiences and preferences using hybrid telemedicine video/in-person visits to ease access to donor evaluation or counseling.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews with donors or donor candidates who completed their evaluation through telemedicine/in-person, or in-person only visits at a tertiary transplant center between November 27, 2019 and March 1, 2021. Enrollment continued until data saturation was reached (interviews with 20 participants) when no new information emerged from additional interviews. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eight themes were identified as follows: (i) reducing financial and logistical burdens (minimizing travel time and travel-related expenses), (ii) enhancing flexibility with scheduling (less time off work and child or family caregiver arrangements), (iii) importance of a walkthrough and establishing shared understanding, (iv) supporting information with technology and visual aids, (v) key role of the coordinator, (vi) preferred visit by provider role (meeting donor surgeon in-person to create rapport and engaging primary care provider in donor evaluation/follow-up), (vii) comparing modality differences in human connection, and (viii) opportunity for family and support network engagement (allowing loved ones to be involved in telemedicine visits irrespective of geographic locations and pandemic restrictions).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Telemedicine/in-person hybrid model can make donor evaluation more accessible and convenient. Our findings help inform about determinants that influence the adoption of telemedicine to initiate donor evaluation to motivate willing donors. In addition, our results call for policy and legislation that support telemedicine services for living donor kidney transplantation across states.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17761,"journal":{"name":"Kidney International Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468024924017170/pdfft?md5=f8e3bb98c131984cd492ceefd8ab93f6&pid=1-s2.0-S2468024924017170-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney International Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468024924017170","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Living kidney donor evaluation is a lengthy and complex process requiring in-person visits. Access to transplant centers, travel costs, lost wages, and dependent care arrangements are barriers to willing donors initiating evaluation. Telemedicine can help streamline and epedite the evaluation process. We aimed to deeply understand donor experiences and preferences using hybrid telemedicine video/in-person visits to ease access to donor evaluation or counseling.

Methods

We conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews with donors or donor candidates who completed their evaluation through telemedicine/in-person, or in-person only visits at a tertiary transplant center between November 27, 2019 and March 1, 2021. Enrollment continued until data saturation was reached (interviews with 20 participants) when no new information emerged from additional interviews. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results

Eight themes were identified as follows: (i) reducing financial and logistical burdens (minimizing travel time and travel-related expenses), (ii) enhancing flexibility with scheduling (less time off work and child or family caregiver arrangements), (iii) importance of a walkthrough and establishing shared understanding, (iv) supporting information with technology and visual aids, (v) key role of the coordinator, (vi) preferred visit by provider role (meeting donor surgeon in-person to create rapport and engaging primary care provider in donor evaluation/follow-up), (vii) comparing modality differences in human connection, and (viii) opportunity for family and support network engagement (allowing loved ones to be involved in telemedicine visits irrespective of geographic locations and pandemic restrictions).

Conclusion

Telemedicine/in-person hybrid model can make donor evaluation more accessible and convenient. Our findings help inform about determinants that influence the adoption of telemedicine to initiate donor evaluation to motivate willing donors. In addition, our results call for policy and legislation that support telemedicine services for living donor kidney transplantation across states.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
捐献者对活体肾脏捐献评估中远程医疗和亲临现场的看法和偏好
导言:活体肾脏捐献者评估是一个漫长而复杂的过程,需要亲自访问。前往移植中心、差旅费、误工费和家属护理安排都是阻碍愿意捐献者启动评估的障碍。远程医疗有助于简化和加快评估过程。我们的目标是深入了解捐献者的经验和偏好,使用混合远程医疗视频/面对面访问来简化捐献者评估或咨询。方法我们对在 2019 年 11 月 27 日至 2021 年 3 月 1 日期间通过远程医疗/面对面访问或仅面对面访问在三级移植中心完成评估的捐献者或捐献者候选人进行了深入的半结构化访谈。招募工作一直持续到数据达到饱和(对 20 名参与者进行了访谈),此时额外的访谈不会产生新的信息。采用归纳式主题分析法对记录誊本进行了分析。结果确定了以下八个主题:(i) 减轻经济和后勤负担(最大限度地减少旅行时间和旅行相关费用),(ii) 提高时间安排的灵活性(减少请假时间和子女或家庭照顾者的安排),(iii) 演练和建立共同理解的重要性,(iv) 利用技术和视觉辅助工具支持信息,(v) 协调员的关键作用、(vi) 医疗服务提供者的首选访问(与捐献者外科医生会面以建立融洽关系,并让初级医疗服务提供者参与捐献者评估/随访),(vii) 比较人与人之间联系的方式差异,以及 (viii) 家庭和支持网络参与的机会(允许亲人参与远程医疗访问,而不受地理位置和大流行病限制的影响)。结论远程医疗/面对面混合模式可以使捐献者评估变得更加容易和方便。我们的研究结果有助于了解影响采用远程医疗启动捐献者评估的决定因素,从而激发捐献者的捐献意愿。此外,我们的研究结果还呼吁制定政策和立法,支持各州为活体肾移植提供远程医疗服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney International Reports
Kidney International Reports Medicine-Nephrology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
1578
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Kidney International Reports, an official journal of the International Society of Nephrology, is a peer-reviewed, open access journal devoted to the publication of leading research and developments related to kidney disease. With the primary aim of contributing to improved care of patients with kidney disease, the journal will publish original clinical and select translational articles and educational content related to the pathogenesis, evaluation and management of acute and chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease (including transplantation), acid-base, fluid and electrolyte disturbances and hypertension. Of particular interest are submissions related to clinical trials, epidemiology, systematic reviews (including meta-analyses) and outcomes research. The journal will also provide a platform for wider dissemination of national and regional guidelines as well as consensus meeting reports.
期刊最新文献
Perspectives of Patients and Clinicians on Reproductive Health Care and ADPKD Nephrologists’ Views on a Workflow for Returning Genetic Results to Research Participants Kidney Beam-A Cost-Effective Digital Intervention to Improve Mental Health Perspectives of Caregivers on Access to Health Care for Children with CKD Age-Related Differences in Rejection Rates, Infections, and Tacrolimus Exposure in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients in the CERTAIN Registry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1