Solidarity and Dilemmas: Tranby, Indenture and the Nuclear-Free and Independent Pacific Campaigns, 1980s

IF 0.6 4区 历史学 Q3 Arts and Humanities Labour History Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.3828/labourhistory.2024.6
Heather Goodall
{"title":"Solidarity and Dilemmas: Tranby, Indenture and the Nuclear-Free and Independent Pacific Campaigns, 1980s","authors":"Heather Goodall","doi":"10.3828/labourhistory.2024.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 1983 call by the Nuclear Free and Independent Pacific (NFIP) campaign to end imperialism built strong alliances between disempowered Indigenous peoples and descendants of the unfree, indentured labourers who had been moved between colonies. The colonies and new nations of the Pacific, including Australia, had been left with populations that included both Indigenous and non-Indigenous (formerly indentured) people, all damaged in different ways by colonialism. There were unresolved tensions between these two groups, particularly in Fiji where the NFIP campaign was established. This paper traces responses in Tranby, an organisation that demonstrated the dilemmas of these tensions for Australian Indigenous people. Tranby, the Aboriginal-led Adult Education Co-operative, took a strong anti-colonial position in the 1980s, advocating land rights as well as endorsing the NFIP campaign. Yet Tranby’s support wavered over the tensions between Indigenous people and those displaced by colonialism through indenture. Tranby’s history demonstrates how its links had continued with colonised peoples damaged in both ways across the Indian and Pacific Oceans, suggesting why it reshaped its support for the NFIP campaign after the 1987 Fiji coups.","PeriodicalId":44167,"journal":{"name":"Labour History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/labourhistory.2024.6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 1983 call by the Nuclear Free and Independent Pacific (NFIP) campaign to end imperialism built strong alliances between disempowered Indigenous peoples and descendants of the unfree, indentured labourers who had been moved between colonies. The colonies and new nations of the Pacific, including Australia, had been left with populations that included both Indigenous and non-Indigenous (formerly indentured) people, all damaged in different ways by colonialism. There were unresolved tensions between these two groups, particularly in Fiji where the NFIP campaign was established. This paper traces responses in Tranby, an organisation that demonstrated the dilemmas of these tensions for Australian Indigenous people. Tranby, the Aboriginal-led Adult Education Co-operative, took a strong anti-colonial position in the 1980s, advocating land rights as well as endorsing the NFIP campaign. Yet Tranby’s support wavered over the tensions between Indigenous people and those displaced by colonialism through indenture. Tranby’s history demonstrates how its links had continued with colonised peoples damaged in both ways across the Indian and Pacific Oceans, suggesting why it reshaped its support for the NFIP campaign after the 1987 Fiji coups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
团结与困境:特兰比、契约以及无核和独立太平洋运动,1980 年代
1983 年,"太平洋无核独立运动"(NFIP)发出了结束帝国主义的呼吁,在丧失权力的土著人民和在殖民地之间迁徙的非自由契约劳工后裔之间建立了牢固的联盟。包括澳大利亚在内的太平洋殖民地和新国家的人口中既有土著人,也有非土著人(前契约劳工),他们都在不同程度上受到殖民主义的损害。这两个群体之间存在着尚未解决的紧张关系,尤其是在斐济,NFIP 运动就是在斐济发起的。本文追溯了 Tranby 的应对措施,该组织展示了澳大利亚土著人在这些紧张关系中的两难处境。Tranby 是由原住民领导的成人教育合作社,在 20 世纪 80 年代采取了强烈的反殖民主义立场,倡导土地权利并支持 NFIP 运动。然而,由于土著居民与殖民主义通过契约形式造成的流离失所者之间关系紧张,特兰比的支持率也随之动摇。特兰比的历史表明,它是如何与印度洋和太平洋上受到双重损害的殖民地人民保持联系的,这也说明了为什么它在 1987 年斐济政变后重新调整了对 NFIP 运动的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Labour History
Labour History Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Explaining Union Decline: Remaking Power Relations in the Pilbara Iron Ore Industry Speed-Ups and Related Problems: The UAW and Grassroots Grievances in the Immediate Post-World War II Period So How Did We Get Here? A Historical Case Study of Migrant Employment in the New Zealand Hotel Sector Shelton Stromquist, Claiming the City: A Global History of Workers’ Fight for Municipal Socialism Jared Davidson, Blood & Dirt: Prison Labour and the Making of New Zealand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1