Outpatient mastectomy is a safe surgical option for patients treated in a rural Appalachian tertiary facility

Gregory P. Stimac , Kristin Lupinacci , Michael S. Cowher , Hannah Hazard-Jenkins
{"title":"Outpatient mastectomy is a safe surgical option for patients treated in a rural Appalachian tertiary facility","authors":"Gregory P. Stimac ,&nbsp;Kristin Lupinacci ,&nbsp;Michael S. Cowher ,&nbsp;Hannah Hazard-Jenkins","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The feasibility of the outpatient mastectomy in a rural setting is poorly characterized. The aim of this study is to analyze the efficacy and safety of an outpatient mastectomy program in our tertiary care facility treating rural Appalachian patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a single-institution, retrospective review of all women with breast cancer older than 18 years of age treated with mastectomy with or without immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction at JW Ruby Memorial Hospital from 2019 to 2022. Our primary objective was to determine the 30, 60, and 90-day readmission rates and complications. Our secondary objective analyzed perioperative pain control variables that contribute to appropriate discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified thirty-two women between 2019–2022 who underwent same-day mastectomy at JW Ruby Memorial Hospital in Morgantown, West Virginia. Overall readmission rates at 30- 60- and 90-days were 3.1% (n = 1), 9.4% (n = 3) and 9.4% (n = 3), respectively. Two patients were admitted for reasons unrelated to surgery. The patient in the 30-day readmission group required washout for hematoma due to perioperative apixaban making the overall surgical readmission rate 3.1% (n = 1). Preoperatively, 90.6% (n = 29) of women received a local anesthetic block by the anesthesia provider. The mean milligram morphine equivalents received for the duration of the hospital encounter was 15.9 (STD = 10.1).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Outpatient mastectomy is a safe and effective option for eligible patients in rural settings. Careful patient selection and a multidisciplinary team should assess the individual circumstances to determine if outpatient mastectomy is appropriate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S295024702400063X/pdfft?md5=d9025e027cdb6edd6786ec513f8f4f22&pid=1-s2.0-S295024702400063X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology Insight","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S295024702400063X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The feasibility of the outpatient mastectomy in a rural setting is poorly characterized. The aim of this study is to analyze the efficacy and safety of an outpatient mastectomy program in our tertiary care facility treating rural Appalachian patients.

Methods

We performed a single-institution, retrospective review of all women with breast cancer older than 18 years of age treated with mastectomy with or without immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction at JW Ruby Memorial Hospital from 2019 to 2022. Our primary objective was to determine the 30, 60, and 90-day readmission rates and complications. Our secondary objective analyzed perioperative pain control variables that contribute to appropriate discharge.

Results

We identified thirty-two women between 2019–2022 who underwent same-day mastectomy at JW Ruby Memorial Hospital in Morgantown, West Virginia. Overall readmission rates at 30- 60- and 90-days were 3.1% (n = 1), 9.4% (n = 3) and 9.4% (n = 3), respectively. Two patients were admitted for reasons unrelated to surgery. The patient in the 30-day readmission group required washout for hematoma due to perioperative apixaban making the overall surgical readmission rate 3.1% (n = 1). Preoperatively, 90.6% (n = 29) of women received a local anesthetic block by the anesthesia provider. The mean milligram morphine equivalents received for the duration of the hospital encounter was 15.9 (STD = 10.1).

Conclusion

Outpatient mastectomy is a safe and effective option for eligible patients in rural settings. Careful patient selection and a multidisciplinary team should assess the individual circumstances to determine if outpatient mastectomy is appropriate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对于在阿巴拉契亚农村地区三级医疗机构接受治疗的患者来说,门诊乳房切除术是一种安全的手术选择
导言农村地区门诊患者乳房切除术的可行性尚不明确。本研究的目的是分析我们治疗阿巴拉契亚农村患者的三级医疗机构的门诊乳房切除术计划的有效性和安全性。方法我们对 JW Ruby 纪念医院在 2019 年至 2022 年期间接受乳房切除术治疗的所有 18 岁以上乳腺癌女性进行了单机构回顾性研究,无论是否立即进行乳房全整形重建。我们的首要目标是确定 30、60 和 90 天的再入院率和并发症。我们的次要目标是分析有助于适当出院的围手术期疼痛控制变量。结果我们发现,2019-2022年间,有32名妇女在西弗吉尼亚州摩根敦的JW鲁比纪念医院接受了当天乳房切除术。30-60天和90天的总体再入院率分别为3.1%(n = 1)、9.4%(n = 3)和9.4%(n = 3)。两名患者的入院原因与手术无关。30天再入院组中的一名患者因围手术期阿哌沙班引起的血肿而需要洗胃,因此总的手术再入院率为3.1%(n = 1)。术前,90.6%(n = 29)的女性接受了麻醉师的局部麻醉阻滞。住院期间平均接受的吗啡毫克当量为15.9(STD = 10.1)。门诊乳房切除术对农村地区符合条件的患者来说是一种安全有效的选择。应谨慎选择患者,并由多学科团队对患者的具体情况进行评估,以确定是否适合进行门诊乳房切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combining liver-directed and immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A review and future directions Timing of breast biopsy and axillary ultrasound does not affect the false positive rate of the axillary ultrasound Small bowel cancers: A population-based analysis of epidemiology, treatment and outcomes in Ontario, Canada from 2005-2020 Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Prehabilitation (PrePFPT) for the prevention of low anterior resection syndrome Pepsinogen and Helicobacter pylori: Serum biomarkers for gastric cancer risk in a diverse United States population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1