Fake review detection techniques, issues, and future research directions: a literature review

IF 2.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Knowledge and Information Systems Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1007/s10115-024-02118-2
Ramadhani Ally Duma, Zhendong Niu, Ally S. Nyamawe, Jude Tchaye-Kondi, Nuru Jingili, Abdulganiyu Abdu Yusuf, Augustino Faustino Deve
{"title":"Fake review detection techniques, issues, and future research directions: a literature review","authors":"Ramadhani Ally Duma, Zhendong Niu, Ally S. Nyamawe, Jude Tchaye-Kondi, Nuru Jingili, Abdulganiyu Abdu Yusuf, Augustino Faustino Deve","doi":"10.1007/s10115-024-02118-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recently, the impact of product or service reviews on customers' purchasing decisions has become increasingly significant in online businesses. Consequently, manipulating reviews for fame or profit has become prevalent, with some businesses resorting to paying fake reviewers to post spam reviews. Given the importance of reviews in decision-making, detecting fake reviews is crucial to ensure fair competition and sustainable e-business practices. Although significant efforts have been made in the last decade to distinguish credible reviews from fake ones, it remains challenging. Our literature review has identified several gaps in the existing research: (1) most fake review detection techniques have been proposed for high-resource languages such as English and Chinese, and few studies have investigated low-resource and multilingual fake review detection, (2) there is a lack of research on deceptive review detection for reviews based on language code-switching (code-mix), (3) current multi-feature integration techniques extract review representations independently, ignoring correlations between them, and (4) there is a lack of a consolidated model that can mutually learn from review emotion, coarse-grained (overall rating), and fine-grained (aspect ratings) features to supplement the problem of sentiment and overall rating inconsistency. In light of these gaps, this study aims to provide an in-depth literature analysis describing strengths and weaknesses, open issues, and future research directions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54749,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge and Information Systems","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge and Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-024-02118-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, the impact of product or service reviews on customers' purchasing decisions has become increasingly significant in online businesses. Consequently, manipulating reviews for fame or profit has become prevalent, with some businesses resorting to paying fake reviewers to post spam reviews. Given the importance of reviews in decision-making, detecting fake reviews is crucial to ensure fair competition and sustainable e-business practices. Although significant efforts have been made in the last decade to distinguish credible reviews from fake ones, it remains challenging. Our literature review has identified several gaps in the existing research: (1) most fake review detection techniques have been proposed for high-resource languages such as English and Chinese, and few studies have investigated low-resource and multilingual fake review detection, (2) there is a lack of research on deceptive review detection for reviews based on language code-switching (code-mix), (3) current multi-feature integration techniques extract review representations independently, ignoring correlations between them, and (4) there is a lack of a consolidated model that can mutually learn from review emotion, coarse-grained (overall rating), and fine-grained (aspect ratings) features to supplement the problem of sentiment and overall rating inconsistency. In light of these gaps, this study aims to provide an in-depth literature analysis describing strengths and weaknesses, open issues, and future research directions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚假评论检测技术、问题和未来研究方向:文献综述
最近,产品或服务评论对客户购买决策的影响在在线业务中变得越来越重要。因此,为了名誉或利益而操纵评论的现象已变得十分普遍,一些企业不惜付钱给虚假评论者来发布垃圾评论。鉴于评论在决策中的重要性,检测虚假评论对于确保公平竞争和可持续的电子商务实践至关重要。尽管在过去十年中,人们在区分可信评论和虚假评论方面做出了巨大努力,但这仍然具有挑战性。我们的文献综述发现了现有研究中的几个空白:(1) 大多数虚假评论检测技术都是针对英语和中文等高资源语言提出的,很少有研究调查低资源和多语言的虚假评论检测;(2) 缺乏对基于语言代码转换(代码混合)的欺骗性评论检测的研究、(3) 当前的多特征整合技术独立提取评论表征,忽略了它们之间的相关性,以及 (4) 缺乏一个可以从评论情感、粗粒度(总体评分)和细粒度(方面评分)特征中相互学习的综合模型,以补充情感和总体评分不一致的问题。鉴于这些差距,本研究旨在提供深入的文献分析,描述优缺点、未决问题和未来研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Knowledge and Information Systems
Knowledge and Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
152
审稿时长
7.2 months
期刊介绍: Knowledge and Information Systems (KAIS) provides an international forum for researchers and professionals to share their knowledge and report new advances on all topics related to knowledge systems and advanced information systems. This monthly peer-reviewed archival journal publishes state-of-the-art research reports on emerging topics in KAIS, reviews of important techniques in related areas, and application papers of interest to a general readership.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic evolution of causal relationships among cryptocurrencies: an analysis via Bayesian networks Deep multi-semantic fuzzy K-means with adaptive weight adjustment Class incremental named entity recognition without forgetting Spectral clustering with scale fairness constraints Supervised kernel-based multi-modal Bhattacharya distance learning for imbalanced data classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1