A tale of government spending efficiency and trust in the state

IF 1.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Public Choice Pub Date : 2024-05-18 DOI:10.1007/s11127-024-01144-6
António Afonso, João Tovar Jalles, Ana Venâncio
{"title":"A tale of government spending efficiency and trust in the state","authors":"António Afonso, João Tovar Jalles, Ana Venâncio","doi":"10.1007/s11127-024-01144-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper empirically links the efficiency and performance assessment of the general government, proxied by efficiency scores, to the trust in government. Government spending efficiency scores are first computed via data envelopment analysis (DEA). Then, relying on panel data and instrumental variable approaches, we estimate the effect of public sector efficiency on citizens trust on national governments. The sample covers 36 OECD countries between 2007 and 2019. We find that the more efficient countries in terms of government spending are Australia, Chile, Ireland, New Zealand, South Korea, Switzerland. Secondly, our main finding is that better public sector spending efficiency is positively associated with citizens’ higher trust in governments. In general, political economy variables and the existence of fiscal rules do not seem to significantly affect our measure of trust. The results hold using alternative proxies for public sector efficiency, alternative measures for trust, specifications with different control variables and different empirical approaches (instrumental variables).</p>","PeriodicalId":48322,"journal":{"name":"Public Choice","volume":"129 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Choice","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-024-01144-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper empirically links the efficiency and performance assessment of the general government, proxied by efficiency scores, to the trust in government. Government spending efficiency scores are first computed via data envelopment analysis (DEA). Then, relying on panel data and instrumental variable approaches, we estimate the effect of public sector efficiency on citizens trust on national governments. The sample covers 36 OECD countries between 2007 and 2019. We find that the more efficient countries in terms of government spending are Australia, Chile, Ireland, New Zealand, South Korea, Switzerland. Secondly, our main finding is that better public sector spending efficiency is positively associated with citizens’ higher trust in governments. In general, political economy variables and the existence of fiscal rules do not seem to significantly affect our measure of trust. The results hold using alternative proxies for public sector efficiency, alternative measures for trust, specifications with different control variables and different empirical approaches (instrumental variables).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政府支出效率与国家信任的故事
本文通过实证研究将以效率分数为代表的政府效率和绩效评估与政府信任度联系起来。首先通过数据包络分析(DEA)计算政府支出效率得分。然后,依靠面板数据和工具变量方法,我们估算了公共部门效率对公民对国家政府信任度的影响。样本涵盖 2007 年至 2019 年的 36 个经合组织国家。我们发现,政府支出效率较高的国家有澳大利亚、智利、爱尔兰、新西兰、韩国和瑞士。其次,我们的主要发现是,公共部门支出效率越高,公民对政府的信任度就越高。总体而言,政治经济变量和财政规则的存在似乎对我们的信任度衡量没有显著影响。使用其他的公共部门效率代理变量、其他的信任度衡量标准、不同控制变量的规格以及不同的实证方法(工具变量),结果都是成立的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Choice
Public Choice Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Public Choice deals with the intersection between economics and political science. The journal was founded at a time when economists and political scientists became interested in the application of essentially economic methods to problems normally dealt with by political scientists. It has always retained strong traces of economic methodology, but new and fruitful techniques have been developed which are not recognizable by economists. Public Choice therefore remains central in its chosen role of introducing the two groups to each other, and allowing them to explain themselves through the medium of its pages. Officially cited as: Public Choice
期刊最新文献
Does more democracy encourage individualism?: evidence from women’s suffrage in the US Appealing, threatening or nudging? Assessing various communication strategies to promote tax compliance Equilibrium responses to price controls: a supply-chain approach The medieval church as an economic firm? Government incentives and firm location choices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1