{"title":"Bounding the number of odd paths in planar graphs via convex optimization","authors":"Asaf Cohen Antonir, Asaf Shapira","doi":"10.1002/jgt.23120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Let <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>N</mi>\n \n <mi>P</mi>\n </msub>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>H</mi>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${N}_{{\\mathscr{P}}}(n,H)$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> denote the maximum number of copies of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>H</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $H$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> in an <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $n$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> vertex planar graph. The problem of bounding this function for various graphs <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>H</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $H$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> has been extensively studied since the 70's. A special case that received a lot of attention recently is when <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>H</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $H$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> is the path on <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mi>m</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $2m+1$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> vertices, denoted <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>P</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mi>m</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${P}_{2m+1}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. Our main result in this paper is that\n\n </p><p>This improves upon the previously best known bound by a factor <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>e</mi>\n \n <mi>m</mi>\n </msup>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${e}^{m}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, which is best possible up to the hidden constant, and makes a significant step toward resolving conjectures of Ghosh et al. and of Cox and Martin. The proof uses graph theoretic arguments together with (simple) arguments from the theory of convex optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgt.23120","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgt.23120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Let denote the maximum number of copies of in an vertex planar graph. The problem of bounding this function for various graphs has been extensively studied since the 70's. A special case that received a lot of attention recently is when is the path on vertices, denoted . Our main result in this paper is that
This improves upon the previously best known bound by a factor , which is best possible up to the hidden constant, and makes a significant step toward resolving conjectures of Ghosh et al. and of Cox and Martin. The proof uses graph theoretic arguments together with (simple) arguments from the theory of convex optimization.