A design science approach to manage spare parts distribution: combining design logic and Goldratt’s thinking processes

Mahesh Gupta, Harshal Lowalekar, Chandrashekhar V. Chaudhari, Johan Groop
{"title":"A design science approach to manage spare parts distribution: combining design logic and Goldratt’s thinking processes","authors":"Mahesh Gupta, Harshal Lowalekar, Chandrashekhar V. Chaudhari, Johan Groop","doi":"10.1108/ijpdlm-08-2023-0288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Design Science (DS) is a relatively new paradigm for addressing complex real-world problems through the design and evaluation of artifacts. Its constituent methodologies are currently being discussed and established in numerous related research fields, such as information systems and management (Hevner <em>et al.</em>, 2004). However, a DS methodology that describes the “how to” is largely lacking, not only in the field of OM but in general. The Theory of Constraints (TOC) and its underlying thinking processes (TP) have produced several novel artifacts for addressing ill-structured real-world operations problems (Dettmer, 1997; Goldratt, 1994), but they have not been analyzed from a DS research standpoint. The purpose of this research is to demonstrate how TOC’s thinking process methodology can be used for conducting exploratory DS research in Operations and Supply Chain Management (OSCM).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A case study of spare parts replenishment illustrates the use of TOC’s thinking processes in DS to structure an initially unstructured problem context and to facilitate the design of a novel solution.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>TOC’s thinking processes are an effective methodology for problem-solving DS research, enabling the development of novel solutions in initially unstructured and wicked problem situations. Combined with structured CIMO design logic TOC’s thinking process offers a systematic method for exploring wicked problems, designing novel solutions, and demonstrating theoretical contributions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The implication for research is that TOC’s thinking process methodology can provide important elements of the lacking “how to” methodology for DS research, not only for the field of OM but in general for the field of management.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The practical outcome of the research is a novel design for dynamic buffer-based replenishment that extends beyond organizational boundaries.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This work shows how the thinking processes can be used in DS research to develop rigorous design propositions for ill-structured problems.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":14251,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpdlm-08-2023-0288","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Design Science (DS) is a relatively new paradigm for addressing complex real-world problems through the design and evaluation of artifacts. Its constituent methodologies are currently being discussed and established in numerous related research fields, such as information systems and management (Hevner et al., 2004). However, a DS methodology that describes the “how to” is largely lacking, not only in the field of OM but in general. The Theory of Constraints (TOC) and its underlying thinking processes (TP) have produced several novel artifacts for addressing ill-structured real-world operations problems (Dettmer, 1997; Goldratt, 1994), but they have not been analyzed from a DS research standpoint. The purpose of this research is to demonstrate how TOC’s thinking process methodology can be used for conducting exploratory DS research in Operations and Supply Chain Management (OSCM).

Design/methodology/approach

A case study of spare parts replenishment illustrates the use of TOC’s thinking processes in DS to structure an initially unstructured problem context and to facilitate the design of a novel solution.

Findings

TOC’s thinking processes are an effective methodology for problem-solving DS research, enabling the development of novel solutions in initially unstructured and wicked problem situations. Combined with structured CIMO design logic TOC’s thinking process offers a systematic method for exploring wicked problems, designing novel solutions, and demonstrating theoretical contributions.

Research limitations/implications

The implication for research is that TOC’s thinking process methodology can provide important elements of the lacking “how to” methodology for DS research, not only for the field of OM but in general for the field of management.

Practical implications

The practical outcome of the research is a novel design for dynamic buffer-based replenishment that extends beyond organizational boundaries.

Originality/value

This work shows how the thinking processes can be used in DS research to develop rigorous design propositions for ill-structured problems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理备件配送的设计科学方法:结合设计逻辑和 Goldratt 的思维过程
目的设计科学(Design Science,DS)是一种通过设计和评估人工制品来解决复杂现实世界问题的相对较新的范式。目前,信息系统和管理等众多相关研究领域都在讨论和确立其组成方法(Hevner 等人,2004 年)。然而,不仅在 OM 领域,而且在一般情况下,描述 "如何做 "的 DS 方法论在很大程度上都是缺失的。约束理论(TOC)及其基本的思维过程(TP)已经产生了一些新颖的工具,用于解决现实世界中结构不严谨的运营问题(Dettmer, 1997; Goldratt, 1994),但还没有从 DS 研究的角度对其进行分析。本研究的目的是展示如何在运营和供应链管理(OSCM)中使用 TOC 的思维过程方法开展探索性 DS 研究。研究结果TOC 的思维过程是解决问题的 DS 研究的有效方法,它能在最初的非结构化和邪恶的问题情境中开发新的解决方案。结合结构化的 CIMO 设计逻辑,TOC 的思维过程提供了一种探索邪恶问题、设计新颖解决方案和展示理论贡献的系统方法。研究局限/启示研究的启示是,TOC 的思维过程方法可以为 DS 研究提供所缺乏的 "如何做 "方法的重要元素,这不仅适用于 OM 领域,也适用于整个管理领域。实际意义研究的实际成果是一种超越组织边界的基于缓冲区的动态补给的新颖设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.40%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: IJPDLM seeks strategically focused, theoretically grounded, empirical and conceptual, quantitative and qualitative, rigorous and relevant, original research studies in logistics, physical distribution and supply chain management operations and associated strategic issues. Quantitatively oriented mathematical and modelling research papers are not suitable for IJPDLM. Desired topics include, but are not limited to: Customer service strategy Omni-channel and multi-channel distribution innovations Order processing and inventory management Implementation of supply chain processes Information and communication technology Sourcing and procurement Risk management and security Personnel recruitment and training Sustainability and environmental Collaboration and integration Global supply chain management and network complexity Information and knowledge management Legal, financial and public policy Retailing, channels and business-to-business management Organizational and human resource development Logistics and SCM education.
期刊最新文献
Cyber risk management strategies and integration: toward supply chain cyber resilience and robustness The paradoxical nature of greening transportation: an analysis of tensions in buyer–supplier dyads System-level impacts of electrification on the road freight transport system: a dynamic approach Navigating diversity in supply chain relationships: building trustworthiness through complementary and supplementary fits The impact of order fulfillment on consumer experience: text mining consumer reviews from Amazon US
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1