Organizational diversity of social-mission platforms: Advancing a configurational research agenda

IF 5.7 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Information and Organization Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2024.100514
Elodie Dessy , Johanna Mair , Virginie Xhauflair
{"title":"Organizational diversity of social-mission platforms: Advancing a configurational research agenda","authors":"Elodie Dessy ,&nbsp;Johanna Mair ,&nbsp;Virginie Xhauflair","doi":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2024.100514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social-mission platforms (SMPs), or platforms that facilitate the interactions between stakeholders across sectors and help them exchange resources to make progress on social and environmental problems, have emerged on a global scale. However, despite their prevalence, little is known about how SMPs organize to orchestrate collective efforts of social innovation. Taking stock of information systems and organizational literature on platforms, we identify four dimensions inherent in platform organizing (i.e., identity, boundary, governance, and technology). We then analyze three case studies to interrogate how these organizing dimensions manifest in SMPs. As a result, we offer a conceptual framework highlighting the trade-offs SMPs face, specifying the design choices they can make, and exposing the interdependences between dimensions. We further illustrate how these interdependences inform a configurational perspective of SMPs and suggest avenues to advance a configurational research agenda to deepen understanding of SMPs as effective vehicles to address Grand Challenges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47253,"journal":{"name":"Information and Organization","volume":"34 3","pages":"Article 100514"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471772724000149/pdfft?md5=b8b0cd7189e418d443a66187f46b9f69&pid=1-s2.0-S1471772724000149-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471772724000149","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social-mission platforms (SMPs), or platforms that facilitate the interactions between stakeholders across sectors and help them exchange resources to make progress on social and environmental problems, have emerged on a global scale. However, despite their prevalence, little is known about how SMPs organize to orchestrate collective efforts of social innovation. Taking stock of information systems and organizational literature on platforms, we identify four dimensions inherent in platform organizing (i.e., identity, boundary, governance, and technology). We then analyze three case studies to interrogate how these organizing dimensions manifest in SMPs. As a result, we offer a conceptual framework highlighting the trade-offs SMPs face, specifying the design choices they can make, and exposing the interdependences between dimensions. We further illustrate how these interdependences inform a configurational perspective of SMPs and suggest avenues to advance a configurational research agenda to deepen understanding of SMPs as effective vehicles to address Grand Challenges.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会任务平台的组织多样性:推进配置研究议程
社会使命平台(SMPs),即促进各部门利益相关者之间互动并帮助他们交换资源以在社会和环境问题上取得进展的平台,已在全球范围内出现。然而,尽管SMPs非常普遍,但人们对其如何组织协调社会创新的集体努力却知之甚少。通过对有关平台的信息系统和组织文献进行总结,我们确定了平台组织的四个内在维度(即身份、边界、治理和技术)。然后,我们分析了三个案例研究,以探究这些组织维度在小型企业中的表现形式。因此,我们提供了一个概念框架,强调了小型企业市场组织所面临的权衡,明确了它们可以做出的设计选择,并揭示了各维度之间的相互依存关系。我们进一步说明了这些相互依存关系如何为 SMP 的配置视角提供信息,并提出了推进配置研究议程的途径,以加深对 SMP 作为应对重大挑战的有效工具的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Advances in information and communication technologies are associated with a wide and increasing range of social consequences, which are experienced by individuals, work groups, organizations, interorganizational networks, and societies at large. Information technologies are implicated in all industries and in public as well as private enterprises. Understanding the relationships between information technologies and social organization is an increasingly important and urgent social and scholarly concern in many disciplinary fields.Information and Organization seeks to publish original scholarly articles on the relationships between information technologies and social organization. It seeks a scholarly understanding that is based on empirical research and relevant theory.
期刊最新文献
Stability and change in digital transformation: A repertoire model of institutionally embedded technology affordances Virtual social contagion in online support communities Transformed knowledge work infrastructures in times of forced remote work Editorial Board Digital innovation, platforms, and global strategy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1