Non-hiatal diaphragmatic hernias: results of transabdominal and transthoracic surgical approaches at a fourth-level hospital.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Hernia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1007/s10029-024-03065-1
Manuel José Torres-Jurado, María Teresa Gómez-Hernández, Andrés E Valera-Montiel, Laura Vicente-González, Omar Abdel-Lah-Fernández, Felipe Carlos Parreño-Manchado, Marcelo Fernando Jiménez-López
{"title":"Non-hiatal diaphragmatic hernias: results of transabdominal and transthoracic surgical approaches at a fourth-level hospital.","authors":"Manuel José Torres-Jurado, María Teresa Gómez-Hernández, Andrés E Valera-Montiel, Laura Vicente-González, Omar Abdel-Lah-Fernández, Felipe Carlos Parreño-Manchado, Marcelo Fernando Jiménez-López","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03065-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to elucidate the clinical and demographic profiles, as well as perioperative outcomes, of patients undergoing surgery for non-hiatal diaphragmatic hernias. Additionally, it aims to analyse these outcomes based on the surgical approach employed (transthoracic versus transabdominal).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational study was conducted at a single center and involved patients diagnosed with non-hiatal diaphragmatic hernia who underwent either emergency or elective surgery between July 2007 and March 2023. Clinical characteristics and perioperative outcomes of these patients were compared using appropriate statistical tests.The research protocol for this observational, retrospective, and comparative study followed the Declaration of Helsinki's ethical requirements. The need for Clinical Research Ethics Committee approval was waived according to our institutional law because the study was a retrospective cohort study based on anonymous data of patients. Informed consent was waived because this study involved the secondary analysis of patient medical records. Additionally, this study followed the STROBE guidelines for reporting observational studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 22 patients being 59.1% men, with median age of 61 years. The predominant clinical presentation was restrictive lung disease (40.9%). The majority of cases (68%) had traumatic aetiology with a median defect size of 4 cm (range of 3-8 cm). Elective surgery was performed in 15 cases (68.1%) and transthoracic approach was employed in 13 patients (54.5%). Postoperative major morbidity reached 27.2% and mortality within 30 days was 9.1%. Emergency surgeries accounted for 44.4% of transabdominal interventions, compared to 23% in the transthoracic subgroup (p = 0.376). There were no statistically significant differences between the transabdominal and trasnthoracic approaches in terms of global postoperative complications (88.8% vs. 84.6%, p = 1), major complications (44.4% vs 15.4%, p = 0.734), mortality (11.1% v 7.6%, p = 1) and recurrence (11.1% vs 7.6%, p = 1). Postoperative stay was significantly shorter in the transthoracic subgroup (6 days vs. 14 days, p = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Non-hiatal diaphragmatic hernias are characterized by significant postoperative major morbidity and mortality rates, standing at 27.2% and 9.1%, respectively, accompanied by a recurrence rate of 9.1%. Both transthoracic and transabdominal approaches demonstrate comparable short- and long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":" ","pages":"1747-1754"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hernia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03065-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to elucidate the clinical and demographic profiles, as well as perioperative outcomes, of patients undergoing surgery for non-hiatal diaphragmatic hernias. Additionally, it aims to analyse these outcomes based on the surgical approach employed (transthoracic versus transabdominal).

Methods: This retrospective, observational study was conducted at a single center and involved patients diagnosed with non-hiatal diaphragmatic hernia who underwent either emergency or elective surgery between July 2007 and March 2023. Clinical characteristics and perioperative outcomes of these patients were compared using appropriate statistical tests.The research protocol for this observational, retrospective, and comparative study followed the Declaration of Helsinki's ethical requirements. The need for Clinical Research Ethics Committee approval was waived according to our institutional law because the study was a retrospective cohort study based on anonymous data of patients. Informed consent was waived because this study involved the secondary analysis of patient medical records. Additionally, this study followed the STROBE guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Results: The analysis included 22 patients being 59.1% men, with median age of 61 years. The predominant clinical presentation was restrictive lung disease (40.9%). The majority of cases (68%) had traumatic aetiology with a median defect size of 4 cm (range of 3-8 cm). Elective surgery was performed in 15 cases (68.1%) and transthoracic approach was employed in 13 patients (54.5%). Postoperative major morbidity reached 27.2% and mortality within 30 days was 9.1%. Emergency surgeries accounted for 44.4% of transabdominal interventions, compared to 23% in the transthoracic subgroup (p = 0.376). There were no statistically significant differences between the transabdominal and trasnthoracic approaches in terms of global postoperative complications (88.8% vs. 84.6%, p = 1), major complications (44.4% vs 15.4%, p = 0.734), mortality (11.1% v 7.6%, p = 1) and recurrence (11.1% vs 7.6%, p = 1). Postoperative stay was significantly shorter in the transthoracic subgroup (6 days vs. 14 days, p = 0.011).

Conclusions: Non-hiatal diaphragmatic hernias are characterized by significant postoperative major morbidity and mortality rates, standing at 27.2% and 9.1%, respectively, accompanied by a recurrence rate of 9.1%. Both transthoracic and transabdominal approaches demonstrate comparable short- and long-term outcomes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非腹腔膈疝:一家四级医院经腹和经胸手术方法的结果。
研究目的本研究旨在阐明接受非食道膈疝手术的患者的临床和人口统计学特征以及围手术期的结果。此外,研究还旨在根据采用的手术方法(经胸与经腹)分析这些结果:这项回顾性观察研究在一个中心进行,涉及 2007 年 7 月至 2023 年 3 月期间接受急诊或择期手术的非食管膈疝患者。这项观察性、回顾性和比较性研究的研究方案符合《赫尔辛基宣言》的伦理要求。由于该研究是一项基于患者匿名数据的回顾性队列研究,因此根据本机构的法律,无需获得临床研究伦理委员会的批准。由于本研究涉及对患者病历的二次分析,因此无需获得知情同意。此外,本研究还遵循了 STROBE 观察性研究报告指南:分析包括 22 名患者,59.1% 为男性,中位年龄为 61 岁。主要临床表现为限制性肺部疾病(40.9%)。大多数病例(68%)的病因是外伤,中位缺损大小为 4 厘米(范围为 3-8 厘米)。15例患者(68.1%)接受了择期手术,13例患者(54.5%)采用了经胸手术。术后主要发病率为 27.2%,30 天内死亡率为 9.1%。在经腹介入手术中,急诊手术占 44.4%,而在经胸介入手术亚组中,急诊手术占 23%(P = 0.376)。在总体术后并发症(88.8% vs. 84.6%,p = 1)、主要并发症(44.4% vs. 15.4%,p = 0.734)、死亡率(11.1% vs. 7.6%,p = 1)和复发率(11.1% vs. 7.6%,p = 1)方面,经腹和经胸两种方法没有明显的统计学差异。经胸亚组的术后住院时间明显较短(6 天 vs. 14 天,p = 0.011):结论:非食道膈疝的特点是术后主要发病率和死亡率较高,分别为 27.2% 和 9.1%,复发率为 9.1%。经胸和经腹两种方法的短期和长期疗效相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hernia
Hernia SURGERY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
26.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hernia was founded in 1997 by Jean P. Chevrel with the purpose of promoting clinical studies and basic research as they apply to groin hernias and the abdominal wall . Since that time, a true revolution in the field of hernia studies has transformed the field from a ”simple” disease to one that is very specialized. While the majority of surgeries for primary inguinal and abdominal wall hernia are performed in hospitals worldwide, complex situations such as multi recurrences, complications, abdominal wall reconstructions and others are being studied and treated in specialist centers. As a result, major institutions and societies are creating specific parameters and criteria to better address the complexities of hernia surgery. Hernia is a journal written by surgeons who have made abdominal wall surgery their specific field of interest, but we will consider publishing content from any surgeon who wishes to improve the science of this field. The Journal aims to ensure that hernia surgery is safer and easier for surgeons as well as patients, and provides a forum to all surgeons in the exchange of new ideas, results, and important research that is the basis of professional activity.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Analysis of hospitalization costs in adult inguinal hernia: based on quantile regression model. Correction to: Mesh versus suture for elective primary umbilical hernia open repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Artificial intelligence (AI), the metaverse and remote learning: simplifications or illusions? Hybrid intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for incisional hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mesh versus suture for elective primary umbilical hernia open repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1