A compressive assessment of patient satisfaction with ophthalmology with ophthalmology clinic services: A study at a tertiary care academic institution amidst and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-20 DOI:10.4103/IJO.IJO_2428_23
Ronak Asodariya, Kavita R Bhatnagar, Manjari Tandon, Kirti Jaisingh, Jyoti Shakrawal, Seema Meena, Latika Pandey
{"title":"A compressive assessment of patient satisfaction with ophthalmology with ophthalmology clinic services: A study at a tertiary care academic institution amidst and after the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Ronak Asodariya, Kavita R Bhatnagar, Manjari Tandon, Kirti Jaisingh, Jyoti Shakrawal, Seema Meena, Latika Pandey","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_2428_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aims to systematically assess patient satisfaction concerning eye care services provided during and after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic at a tertiary care academic institution. This work seeks to analyze the various dimensions influencing the holistic measure of overall patient contentment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 2485 patients seeking physical consultation for ocular conditions at a tertiary care academic institution between April 2020 and December 2022 were recruited in a cross-sectional study. They were divided into two groups, viz. during the COVID period and post-COVID period. The primary focus was on evaluating overall satisfaction, measured through a validated patient satisfaction questionnaire (PSQ-18).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study encompassed a total of 2485 participants, with 1242 individuals in the cohort during the COVID period and 1243 in the post-COVID phase. Within the COVID period subgroup, the mean age of male and female patients was 39.46 ± 19.31 and 39.58 ± 19.07 years, respectively. In the post-COVID subgroup, the mean age of male and female patients was 45.26 ± 19.38 and 45.36 ± 19.22 years, respectively. Examining the COVID subgroup, the highest satisfaction scores were observed in the domain of time spent with the doctor (3.3453 ± 0.59), followed by financial aspects (3.0816 ± 0.47), interpersonal manner (3.0589 ± 0.37), and accessibility and convenience (3.0585 ± 0.37). Notably, technical quality received the lowest satisfaction score (2.4763 ± 0.42). A statistically significant difference ( P < 0.0001) was noted in the PSQ-18 scores between the two groups. In the post-COVID subgroup, patients expressed higher satisfaction with the technical quality of treatment, irrespective of the mode of management. However, financial satisfaction was better in the COVID group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study using the PSQ-18 questionnaire highlights significant variations in patient satisfaction with ophthalmology clinic services during and after the COVID era. Notably, time spent with the doctor scored the highest, emphasizing its positive impact. However, addressing concerns related to technical quality is crucial for overall improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"1798-1804"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_2428_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The study aims to systematically assess patient satisfaction concerning eye care services provided during and after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic at a tertiary care academic institution. This work seeks to analyze the various dimensions influencing the holistic measure of overall patient contentment.

Methods: A cohort of 2485 patients seeking physical consultation for ocular conditions at a tertiary care academic institution between April 2020 and December 2022 were recruited in a cross-sectional study. They were divided into two groups, viz. during the COVID period and post-COVID period. The primary focus was on evaluating overall satisfaction, measured through a validated patient satisfaction questionnaire (PSQ-18).

Results: The study encompassed a total of 2485 participants, with 1242 individuals in the cohort during the COVID period and 1243 in the post-COVID phase. Within the COVID period subgroup, the mean age of male and female patients was 39.46 ± 19.31 and 39.58 ± 19.07 years, respectively. In the post-COVID subgroup, the mean age of male and female patients was 45.26 ± 19.38 and 45.36 ± 19.22 years, respectively. Examining the COVID subgroup, the highest satisfaction scores were observed in the domain of time spent with the doctor (3.3453 ± 0.59), followed by financial aspects (3.0816 ± 0.47), interpersonal manner (3.0589 ± 0.37), and accessibility and convenience (3.0585 ± 0.37). Notably, technical quality received the lowest satisfaction score (2.4763 ± 0.42). A statistically significant difference ( P < 0.0001) was noted in the PSQ-18 scores between the two groups. In the post-COVID subgroup, patients expressed higher satisfaction with the technical quality of treatment, irrespective of the mode of management. However, financial satisfaction was better in the COVID group.

Conclusion: Our study using the PSQ-18 questionnaire highlights significant variations in patient satisfaction with ophthalmology clinic services during and after the COVID era. Notably, time spent with the doctor scored the highest, emphasizing its positive impact. However, addressing concerns related to technical quality is crucial for overall improvement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼科患者对眼科门诊服务满意度的压缩评估:一项在 COVID-19 大流行期间和之后对一家三级医疗学术机构进行的研究。
目的:本研究旨在系统评估患者对一家三级医疗学术机构在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间和之后提供的眼科护理服务的满意度。这项工作旨在分析影响患者总体满意度整体衡量标准的各个维度:在一项横断面研究中,招募了 2020 年 4 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在一家三级医疗学术机构就诊的 2485 名眼科疾病患者。他们被分为两组,即 COVID 期间和后 COVID 期间。主要重点是评估总体满意度,通过有效的患者满意度问卷(PSQ-18)进行测量:研究共涉及 2485 名参与者,其中 1242 人在 COVID 期间,1243 人在后 COVID 阶段。在 COVID 期间的亚组中,男性和女性患者的平均年龄分别为(39.46±19.31)岁和(39.58±19.07)岁。在 COVID 后亚组中,男性和女性患者的平均年龄分别为(45.26±19.38)岁和(45.36±19.22)岁。在 COVID 分组中,与医生共处时间(3.3453 ± 0.59)的满意度最高,其次是经济方面(3.0816 ± 0.47)、人际交往(3.0589 ± 0.37)以及可及性和便利性(3.0585 ± 0.37)。值得注意的是,技术质量的满意度得分最低(2.4763 ± 0.42)。两组之间的 PSQ-18 分数差异有统计学意义(P < 0.0001)。在 COVID 后亚组中,无论采用哪种管理模式,患者对治疗技术质量的满意度都较高。然而,COVID 组的经济满意度更高:我们使用 PSQ-18 问卷进行的研究表明,在 COVID 时代和之后,患者对眼科诊所服务的满意度存在显著差异。值得注意的是,与医生共处的时间得分最高,强调了其积极影响。然而,解决与技术质量相关的问题对于整体改善至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.40%
发文量
1963
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Ophthalmology covers clinical, experimental, basic science research and translational research studies related to medical, ethical and social issues in field of ophthalmology and vision science. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
期刊最新文献
A compressive assessment of patient satisfaction with ophthalmology with ophthalmology clinic services: A study at a tertiary care academic institution amidst and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Histopathological findings of anterior lens capsule in pediatric cataract. Primary eyecare in paediatrics population (PREPP) - II study: Study of satisfaction of services and barrier for not reporting to the base hospital on referral among pediatric patients treated in six major vision centers of a tertiary eye care facility in Southern India. Clinical, microbiologic, and treatment outcomes of dematiaceous fungal keratitis - A retrospective study. Effect of graded partial inferior rectus muscle tenotomy in treatment for superior oblique paralysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1