Relapse after intermittent access to cocaine: Discriminative cues more effectively trigger drug seeking than do conditioned cues.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1007/s00213-024-06614-9
Ndeye Aissatou Ndiaye, Sema Abu Shamleh, Domiziana Casale, Sol'Abraham Castaneda-Ouellet, Isabel Laplante, Mike J F Robinson, Anne-Noël Samaha
{"title":"Relapse after intermittent access to cocaine: Discriminative cues more effectively trigger drug seeking than do conditioned cues.","authors":"Ndeye Aissatou Ndiaye, Sema Abu Shamleh, Domiziana Casale, Sol'Abraham Castaneda-Ouellet, Isabel Laplante, Mike J F Robinson, Anne-Noël Samaha","doi":"10.1007/s00213-024-06614-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>When people with drug addiction encounter cues associated with drug use, this can trigger cravings and relapse. These cues can include conditioned stimuli (CSs) signaling drug delivery and discriminative stimuli (DSs) signaling drug availability. Compared to CS effects, DS effects are less explored in preclinical studies on cue-induced relapse.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We compared CS and DS effects on reward seeking following abstinence from intermittent-access cocaine (or sucrose) self-administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During 15-20 intermittent-access sessions, rats self-administered i.v. cocaine or sucrose pellets paired with a light-tone CS. Cocaine/sucrose was available for 5-min (signalled by a light; DS+) and unavailable for 25 min (signalled by different lighting conditions; DS-), and this cycled for 4 h/session. Following abstinence, we measured cocaine/sucrose seeking under extinction triggered by CS and DS presentation, and instrumental responding reinforced by these cues.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across intermittent-access sessions, rats increased lever pressing for cocaine or sucrose during DS+ periods and decreased responding during DS- periods. On days 2 and 21 of abstinence, only presentation of the DS+ or DS+ and CS combined elicited increased cocaine/sucrose-seeking behaviour (i.e., increased active lever presses). Presenting the DS- alongside the DS+ suppressed the increased cocaine-seeking behaviour otherwise produced by the DS+ . Finally, on day 21 of abstinence, rats showed equivalent levels of lever pressing reinforced by the DS+ , CS and by the DS+ and CS combined, suggesting comparable conditioned reinforcing value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After intermittent self-administration, cocaine-associated DSs and CSs acquire similar conditioned reinforcing properties, but DSs more effectively trigger increases in drug seeking.</p>","PeriodicalId":20783,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"2015-2032"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-024-06614-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: When people with drug addiction encounter cues associated with drug use, this can trigger cravings and relapse. These cues can include conditioned stimuli (CSs) signaling drug delivery and discriminative stimuli (DSs) signaling drug availability. Compared to CS effects, DS effects are less explored in preclinical studies on cue-induced relapse.

Objective: We compared CS and DS effects on reward seeking following abstinence from intermittent-access cocaine (or sucrose) self-administration.

Methods: During 15-20 intermittent-access sessions, rats self-administered i.v. cocaine or sucrose pellets paired with a light-tone CS. Cocaine/sucrose was available for 5-min (signalled by a light; DS+) and unavailable for 25 min (signalled by different lighting conditions; DS-), and this cycled for 4 h/session. Following abstinence, we measured cocaine/sucrose seeking under extinction triggered by CS and DS presentation, and instrumental responding reinforced by these cues.

Results: Across intermittent-access sessions, rats increased lever pressing for cocaine or sucrose during DS+ periods and decreased responding during DS- periods. On days 2 and 21 of abstinence, only presentation of the DS+ or DS+ and CS combined elicited increased cocaine/sucrose-seeking behaviour (i.e., increased active lever presses). Presenting the DS- alongside the DS+ suppressed the increased cocaine-seeking behaviour otherwise produced by the DS+ . Finally, on day 21 of abstinence, rats showed equivalent levels of lever pressing reinforced by the DS+ , CS and by the DS+ and CS combined, suggesting comparable conditioned reinforcing value.

Conclusions: After intermittent self-administration, cocaine-associated DSs and CSs acquire similar conditioned reinforcing properties, but DSs more effectively trigger increases in drug seeking.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
间歇性吸食可卡因后复吸:辨别性线索比条件性线索更有效地触发药物寻求。
理由当吸毒成瘾者遇到与吸毒相关的线索时,就会引发渴求和复吸。这些线索可能包括表示毒品输送的条件刺激(CS)和表示毒品可用性的辨别刺激(DS)。与CS效应相比,DS效应在线索诱导复吸的临床前研究中探讨较少:我们比较了 CS 和 DS 对间歇性可卡因(或蔗糖)自我给药戒断后寻求奖赏的影响:方法:在15-20次间歇性给药过程中,大鼠自我给药静脉注射可卡因或蔗糖颗粒,并配以浅色CS。可卡因/蔗糖在5分钟内可用(以灯光为信号;DS+),25分钟内不可用(以不同的灯光条件为信号;DS-),如此循环4小时/次。戒断后,我们测量了在CS和DS呈现引发的消退下的可卡因/蔗糖寻求,以及在这些线索强化下的工具反应:结果:在间歇期,大鼠对可卡因或蔗糖的压杆反应在DS+期间有所增加,而在DS-期间则有所减少。在禁欲的第 2 天和第 21 天,只有 DS+ 或 DS+ 与 CS 的结合才会引起可卡因/蔗糖寻求行为的增加(即主动按压杠杆的增加)。在施用 DS+ 的同时施用 DS- 会抑制 DS+ 所引起的可卡因/蔗糖寻求行为的增加。最后,在戒断的第 21 天,大鼠在 DS+、CS 以及 DS+ 和 CS 的共同作用下表现出同等水平的按压杠杆强化行为,这表明条件强化价值相当:结论:在间歇性自我给药后,可卡因相关的 DS 和 CS 获得了相似的条件强化特性,但 DS 更能有效地引发药物寻求的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychopharmacology
Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
257
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Behavioural Pharmacology Society (EBPS) Psychopharmacology is an international journal that covers the broad topic of elucidating mechanisms by which drugs affect behavior. The scope of the journal encompasses the following fields: Human Psychopharmacology: Experimental This section includes manuscripts describing the effects of drugs on mood, behavior, cognition and physiology in humans. The journal encourages submissions that involve brain imaging, genetics, neuroendocrinology, and developmental topics. Usually manuscripts in this section describe studies conducted under controlled conditions, but occasionally descriptive or observational studies are also considered. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Translational This section comprises studies addressing the broad intersection of drugs and psychiatric illness. This includes not only clinical trials and studies of drug usage and metabolism, drug surveillance, and pharmacoepidemiology, but also work utilizing the entire range of clinically relevant methodologies, including neuroimaging, pharmacogenetics, cognitive science, biomarkers, and others. Work directed toward the translation of preclinical to clinical knowledge is especially encouraged. The key feature of submissions to this section is that they involve a focus on clinical aspects. Preclinical psychopharmacology: Behavioral and Neural This section considers reports on the effects of compounds with defined chemical structures on any aspect of behavior, in particular when correlated with neurochemical effects, in species other than humans. Manuscripts containing neuroscientific techniques in combination with behavior are welcome. We encourage reports of studies that provide insight into the mechanisms of drug action, at the behavioral and molecular levels. Preclinical Psychopharmacology: Translational This section considers manuscripts that enhance the confidence in a central mechanism that could be of therapeutic value for psychiatric or neurological patients, using disease-relevant preclinical models and tests, or that report on preclinical manipulations and challenges that have the potential to be translated to the clinic. Studies aiming at the refinement of preclinical models based upon clinical findings (back-translation) will also be considered. The journal particularly encourages submissions that integrate measures of target tissue exposure, activity on the molecular target and/or modulation of the targeted biochemical pathways. Preclinical Psychopharmacology: Molecular, Genetic and Epigenetic This section focuses on the molecular and cellular actions of neuropharmacological agents / drugs, and the identification / validation of drug targets affecting the CNS in health and disease. We particularly encourage studies that provide insight into the mechanisms of drug action at the molecular level. Manuscripts containing evidence for genetic or epigenetic effects on neurochemistry or behavior are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Sex differences in morphine sensitivity of neuroligin-3 knockout mice. Association between angiotensin-converting enzyme gene insertion/deletion polymorphism and cognition impairment in patients with schizophrenia. Fear generalization modulated by shock intensity and protein synthesis inhibitor. Empagliflozin-activated AMPK elicits neuroprotective properties in reserpine-induced depression via regulating dynamics of hippocampal autophagy/inflammation and PKCζ-mediated neurogenesis. Evaluation of (S)-T1 and (S)-T2 ligands targeting α3β4 nAChR as potential nicotine addiction pharmacotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1