Differential Effects of Pharmacologic and Mechanical Support on Right-Left Ventricular Coupling.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1007/s12265-024-10522-w
Kimberly K Lamberti, Efrat M Goffer, Elazer R Edelman, Steven P Keller
{"title":"Differential Effects of Pharmacologic and Mechanical Support on Right-Left Ventricular Coupling.","authors":"Kimberly K Lamberti, Efrat M Goffer, Elazer R Edelman, Steven P Keller","doi":"10.1007/s12265-024-10522-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous ventricular assist devices are increasingly relied on to maintain perfusion for cardiogenic shock patients. Optimal medical management strategies however remain uncertain from limited understanding of interventricular effects. This study analyzed the effects of pharmacologic and left-sided mechanical support on right ventricular function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A porcine model was developed to assess biventricular function during bolus pharmacologic administration before and after left-sided percutaneous ventricular assist and in cardiogenic shock.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The presence of mechanical support increased right ventricular load and stress with respect to the left ventricle. This shifted and exaggerated the relative effects of commonly used vasoactive agents. Furthermore, induction of cardiogenic shock led to differential pulmonary vascular and right ventricular responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Left ventricular ischemia and mechanical support altered interventricular coupling. Resulting impacts of pharmacologic agents indicate differential right heart responses and sensitivity to treatments and the need for further study to optimize biventricular function in shock patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research","volume":" ","pages":"1181-1192"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11518637/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-024-10522-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous ventricular assist devices are increasingly relied on to maintain perfusion for cardiogenic shock patients. Optimal medical management strategies however remain uncertain from limited understanding of interventricular effects. This study analyzed the effects of pharmacologic and left-sided mechanical support on right ventricular function.

Methods: A porcine model was developed to assess biventricular function during bolus pharmacologic administration before and after left-sided percutaneous ventricular assist and in cardiogenic shock.

Results: The presence of mechanical support increased right ventricular load and stress with respect to the left ventricle. This shifted and exaggerated the relative effects of commonly used vasoactive agents. Furthermore, induction of cardiogenic shock led to differential pulmonary vascular and right ventricular responses.

Conclusions: Left ventricular ischemia and mechanical support altered interventricular coupling. Resulting impacts of pharmacologic agents indicate differential right heart responses and sensitivity to treatments and the need for further study to optimize biventricular function in shock patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物和机械支持对左右心室耦合的不同影响
背景:心源性休克患者越来越依赖经皮心室辅助装置来维持血流灌注。然而,由于对心室间作用的了解有限,最佳医疗管理策略仍不确定。本研究分析了药物和左侧机械支持对右心室功能的影响:方法:建立了一个猪模型,以评估左侧经皮心室辅助和心源性休克患者在栓塞给药前后的双心室功能:结果:机械支持的存在增加了右心室相对于左心室的负荷和压力。这转移并夸大了常用血管活性药物的相对效应。此外,诱发心源性休克导致肺血管和右心室反应不同:结论:左心室缺血和机械支持改变了心室间耦合。结论:左心室缺血和机械支持改变了心室间耦合,药理作用的结果表明右心反应和对治疗的敏感性不同,需要进一步研究以优化休克患者的双心室功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
148
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research (JCTR) is a premier journal in cardiovascular translational research. JCTR is the journal of choice for authors seeking the broadest audience for emerging technologies, therapies and diagnostics, pre-clinical research, and first-in-man clinical trials. JCTR''s intent is to provide a forum for critical evaluation of the novel cardiovascular science, to showcase important and clinically relevant aspects of the new research, as well as to discuss the impediments that may need to be overcome during the translation to patient care.
期刊最新文献
Machine Learning Model for Risk Prediction of Prolonged Intensive Care Unit in Patients Receiving Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Therapy during Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. NAT10 Modulates Atherosclerosis Progression Mediated by Macrophage Polarization Through Regulating ac4C Modification of TLR9. Associations of Blood Lipid-Related Polygenic Scores, Lifestyle Factors and Their Combined Effects with Risk of Coronary Artery Disease in the UK Biobank Cohort. Prediction of Major Adverse Limb Events in Females with Peripheral Artery Disease using Blood-Based Biomarkers and Clinical Features. Endothelial Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Allow to Differentiate Between Various Endotypes of INOCA: A Multicentre, Prospective, Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1