Evaluating benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with hearing loss using behavioural and predictive metrics.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1080/14992027.2024.2354500
Julien Zanin, Jonathan Vaisberg, Sarah Swann, Gary Rance
{"title":"Evaluating benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with hearing loss using behavioural and predictive metrics.","authors":"Julien Zanin, Jonathan Vaisberg, Sarah Swann, Gary Rance","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2354500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the benefit of remote-microphone (RM) systems for adults with sensory hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Speech recognition in quiet and in background noise was assessed. Participants with hearing loss underwent testing in two device conditions: hearing aids (HAs) alone and HAs with a RM. Normal hearing participants completed testing in the unaided condition. Predictive speech intelligibility modelling using the Hearing-Aid Speech Perception Index (HASPI) was also performed on recordings of HA processed test material.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Twenty adults with sensory hearing loss and 10 adults with normal hearing participated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Speech recognition for participants with hearing loss improved significantly when using the RM compared to HAs alone fit to Phonak's proprietary prescription. Largest benefits were observed in the most challenging conditions. At the lowest signal-to-noise ratio, participants with hearing loss using a RM outperformed normal hearing listeners. Predicted intelligibility scores produced by HASPI were strongly correlated to behavioural results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adults using HAs who have significant difficulties understanding speech in noise will experience considerable benefits with the addition of a RM. Improvements in speech recognition were observed for all participants using RM systems, including those with relatively mild hearing loss. HASPI modelling reliably predicted the speech perception difficulties experienced.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"327-335"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2354500","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the benefit of remote-microphone (RM) systems for adults with sensory hearing loss.

Design: Speech recognition in quiet and in background noise was assessed. Participants with hearing loss underwent testing in two device conditions: hearing aids (HAs) alone and HAs with a RM. Normal hearing participants completed testing in the unaided condition. Predictive speech intelligibility modelling using the Hearing-Aid Speech Perception Index (HASPI) was also performed on recordings of HA processed test material.

Study sample: Twenty adults with sensory hearing loss and 10 adults with normal hearing participated.

Results: Speech recognition for participants with hearing loss improved significantly when using the RM compared to HAs alone fit to Phonak's proprietary prescription. Largest benefits were observed in the most challenging conditions. At the lowest signal-to-noise ratio, participants with hearing loss using a RM outperformed normal hearing listeners. Predicted intelligibility scores produced by HASPI were strongly correlated to behavioural results.

Conclusions: Adults using HAs who have significant difficulties understanding speech in noise will experience considerable benefits with the addition of a RM. Improvements in speech recognition were observed for all participants using RM systems, including those with relatively mild hearing loss. HASPI modelling reliably predicted the speech perception difficulties experienced.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用行为和预测指标评估远程麦克风技术对听力损失成人的益处。
目的:研究远程麦克风系统对感官听力损失成人的益处:调查远程麦克风(RM)系统对感官听力损失成人的益处:设计:评估安静和背景噪声中的语音识别能力。有听力损失的参与者在两种设备条件下进行了测试:单独的助听器(HAs)和带有RM的助听器。听力正常的参与者在无助听器的条件下完成测试。研究样本:研究样本:20 名感官听力损失的成年人和 10 名听力正常的成年人参加:结果:与根据峰力专有处方单独配制的助听器相比,使用 RM 的听力损失参与者的语音识别能力明显提高。在最具挑战性的条件下观察到了最大的优势。在最低信噪比条件下,使用 RM 的听力损失参与者的表现优于听力正常的听众。HASPI 预测的可懂度分数与行为结果密切相关:结论:使用听力障碍助听器的成年人在噪声中理解语音有很大困难,如果增加一个 RM,他们将受益匪浅。所有使用 RM 系统的参与者,包括听力损失相对较轻的人,在语音识别方面都有所改善。HASPI 模型可靠地预测了所经历的言语感知困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of cochlear implantation in adults: a scoping review of studies with qualitative methodology. Exploring the multidimensional impact of tinnitus on adolescents: a qualitative study of lived experience and professional perspective. Correction. Mobile game-based auditory training as an adjunct to aural rehabilitation in preschool children with cochlear implants: a randomised feasibility trial. An open-access dataset of unaided and hearing aid-assisted auditory perception measures in complex virtual acoustic scenes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1