Translation, cross-cultural adaptation to Brazilian Portuguese and measurement properties of the WaLIDD score.

Mariana Arias Avila, Guilherme Tavares de Arruda, Amanda Garcia de Godoy, Patricia Driusso
{"title":"Translation, cross-cultural adaptation to Brazilian Portuguese and measurement properties of the WaLIDD score.","authors":"Mariana Arias Avila, Guilherme Tavares de Arruda, Amanda Garcia de Godoy, Patricia Driusso","doi":"10.61622/rbgo/2024AO16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Dysmenorrhea is the pain related to menstruation; to screen for the symptoms, a working ability, location, intensity of days of pain, and dysmenorrhea (WaLIDD) score was created. The purpose of this work was to culturally adapt and assess the measurement properties of the WaLIDD score for dysmenorrhea in Brazilian women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional online study, we evaluated women with and without dysmenorrhea. Criterion validity and construct validity were assessed, respectively, by the Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve and correlations with the bodily pain and social functioning domains of medical outcomes study 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), self-report of absenteeism and Stanford Presenteeism Scale for presenteeism. Test-retest reliability and measurement errors were assessed, respectively, by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland and Altman Graph.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>430 women completed the test, 238 (55.4%) women had dysmenorrhea, and 199 (46.3%) answered the questionnaire twice for the retest. The cutoff points ≥4, ≥5, and ≥5 could discriminate between women with and without dysmenorrhea, absenteeism, and presenteeism related to dysmenorrhea, respectively. Correlations between SF-36 - pain and social functioning domains and WaLIDD score were weak to strong and negative. For WaLIDD total Score, ICC was 0.95 and the limits of agreement were -1.54 and 1.62.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WaLIDD score is a short, valid and reliable instrument to screen and predict dysmenorrhea and could predict absenteeism and presenteeism related to dysmenorrhea in Brazilian women.</p>","PeriodicalId":74699,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","volume":"46 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11075383/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61622/rbgo/2024AO16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Dysmenorrhea is the pain related to menstruation; to screen for the symptoms, a working ability, location, intensity of days of pain, and dysmenorrhea (WaLIDD) score was created. The purpose of this work was to culturally adapt and assess the measurement properties of the WaLIDD score for dysmenorrhea in Brazilian women.

Methods: In this cross-sectional online study, we evaluated women with and without dysmenorrhea. Criterion validity and construct validity were assessed, respectively, by the Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve and correlations with the bodily pain and social functioning domains of medical outcomes study 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), self-report of absenteeism and Stanford Presenteeism Scale for presenteeism. Test-retest reliability and measurement errors were assessed, respectively, by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland and Altman Graph.

Results: 430 women completed the test, 238 (55.4%) women had dysmenorrhea, and 199 (46.3%) answered the questionnaire twice for the retest. The cutoff points ≥4, ≥5, and ≥5 could discriminate between women with and without dysmenorrhea, absenteeism, and presenteeism related to dysmenorrhea, respectively. Correlations between SF-36 - pain and social functioning domains and WaLIDD score were weak to strong and negative. For WaLIDD total Score, ICC was 0.95 and the limits of agreement were -1.54 and 1.62.

Conclusion: WaLIDD score is a short, valid and reliable instrument to screen and predict dysmenorrhea and could predict absenteeism and presenteeism related to dysmenorrhea in Brazilian women.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
WaLIDD评分的翻译、巴西葡萄牙语的跨文化调整和测量特性。
目的:痛经是与月经有关的疼痛:痛经是指与月经有关的疼痛;为了筛查痛经症状,我们创建了工作能力、痛经部位、痛经天数和痛经强度(WaLIDD)评分。这项工作的目的是对巴西妇女痛经的 WaLIDD 评分进行文化适应性调整并评估其测量特性:在这项横断面在线研究中,我们对有痛经和无痛经的女性进行了评估。标准效度和建构效度分别通过接收器特征曲线(ROC)以及与医疗结果研究 36 项短式健康调查(SF-36)中的身体疼痛和社会功能领域、缺勤自述和斯坦福缺勤量表(Stanford Presenteeism Scale)的相关性进行评估。通过类内相关系数(ICC)和布兰德与阿尔特曼图(Bland and Altman Graph)分别评估了重测可靠性和测量误差:430 名妇女完成了测试,238 名(55.4%)妇女有痛经,199 名(46.3%)妇女两次回答问卷进行了重测。截断点≥4、≥5和≥5分别可以区分有痛经和无痛经、缺勤和与痛经有关的缺勤。SF-36 - 疼痛和社会功能域与 WaLIDD 评分之间的相关性由弱到强,呈负相关。WaLIDD总分的ICC值为0.95,一致性界限为-1.54和1.62:WaLIDD评分是筛查和预测痛经的一种简短、有效和可靠的工具,可以预测巴西妇女与痛经有关的缺勤和旷工情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of vaginal microbiota before and after treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix. Clinical, histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Comment on: Effect of combined training on body image, body composition and functional capacity in patients with breast cancer: controlled clinical trial. Comment on: Effects of COVID-19 on human placentas in the second and third trimester. Female genital tract microbiome: the influence of probiotics on assisted reproduction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1