Effects of Total Body Irradiation on Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Outcomes in Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Prior Central Nervous System Involvement

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jtct.2024.05.014
{"title":"Effects of Total Body Irradiation on Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Outcomes in Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Prior Central Nervous System Involvement","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.05.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The implications of previous central nervous system (CNS) involvement in children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remain inadequately understood. Patients with CNS disease require more upfront CNS-directed intrathecal therapy, but little is known about whether transplant conditioning regimens should be intensified or if previous CNS involvement impacts post-HCT outcomes. While total body irradiation (TBI) remains standard for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia myeloablative conditioning, it has been largely replaced with chemotherapy-only myeloablation in pediatric AML, primarily due to toxicity and late effects associated with TBI. In the setting of previous CNS involvement, it has been suggested that TBI-based myeloablation may have advantages due to superior CNS tissue penetration and thus decreased rates of AML relapse post-HCT. We analyzed a publicly available dataset derived from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplantation Research (CIBMTR) registry to characterize the impact of TBI in HCT preparative regimens in pediatric AML patients with a history of CNS involvement. The study dataset was obtained from the CIBMTR data repository. The study cohort included patients aged ≤21 years who underwent initial allogeneic HCT with myeloablative conditioning for de novo AML in the first or second complete remission (CR) between 2008 and 2016, who provided consent for research. Patients with mismatched related donor transplants and noncalcineurin inhibitor graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis were excluded. The dataset was further modified by excluding patients with missing disease site data or those with non-CNS extramedullary disease. Patients were categorized as CNS-positive or -negative AML (AML-CNS(+) and AML-CNS(−), respectively) based on the disease status at diagnosis. The Cox regression model and Fine-Grey methods were employed to delineate the effects of TBI and CNS disease on key HCT outcomes. The study cohort comprised 550 pediatric AML patients, of which 25% (</span><em>n</em> = 136) were AML-CNS(+). CNS involvement was more prevalent in patients aged 0 to 3 years, patients who were in the second CR, and those with a mismatched unrelated donor or umbilical cord blood. AML-CNS(+) patients demonstrated a lower relapse rate (hazard ratio: 0.50, 95% confidence interval: 0.33 to 0.76) compared to AML-CNS(−) patients, with comparable disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (<em>P</em><span> = .10 and 0.20, respectively) in the two cohorts. The entire TBI-treated cohort showed an association with increased risks of grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD<span>, bloodstream infections, and endocrine dysfunction. TBI use within the AML-CNS(+) cohort was associated with a lower relapse rate but increased risks of nonrelapse mortality and a trend of higher grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD. In this population-based analysis of pediatric patients with de novo AML undergoing HCT, TBI-based conditioning regimens did not confer an advantage in DFS or OS compared to non-TBI regimens, irrespective of CNS disease status. However, TBI use was associated with increased risks of short- and long-term comorbidities. These findings underscore the need for careful consideration of TBI in pediatric AML.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266663672400410X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The implications of previous central nervous system (CNS) involvement in children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remain inadequately understood. Patients with CNS disease require more upfront CNS-directed intrathecal therapy, but little is known about whether transplant conditioning regimens should be intensified or if previous CNS involvement impacts post-HCT outcomes. While total body irradiation (TBI) remains standard for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia myeloablative conditioning, it has been largely replaced with chemotherapy-only myeloablation in pediatric AML, primarily due to toxicity and late effects associated with TBI. In the setting of previous CNS involvement, it has been suggested that TBI-based myeloablation may have advantages due to superior CNS tissue penetration and thus decreased rates of AML relapse post-HCT. We analyzed a publicly available dataset derived from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplantation Research (CIBMTR) registry to characterize the impact of TBI in HCT preparative regimens in pediatric AML patients with a history of CNS involvement. The study dataset was obtained from the CIBMTR data repository. The study cohort included patients aged ≤21 years who underwent initial allogeneic HCT with myeloablative conditioning for de novo AML in the first or second complete remission (CR) between 2008 and 2016, who provided consent for research. Patients with mismatched related donor transplants and noncalcineurin inhibitor graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis were excluded. The dataset was further modified by excluding patients with missing disease site data or those with non-CNS extramedullary disease. Patients were categorized as CNS-positive or -negative AML (AML-CNS(+) and AML-CNS(−), respectively) based on the disease status at diagnosis. The Cox regression model and Fine-Grey methods were employed to delineate the effects of TBI and CNS disease on key HCT outcomes. The study cohort comprised 550 pediatric AML patients, of which 25% (n = 136) were AML-CNS(+). CNS involvement was more prevalent in patients aged 0 to 3 years, patients who were in the second CR, and those with a mismatched unrelated donor or umbilical cord blood. AML-CNS(+) patients demonstrated a lower relapse rate (hazard ratio: 0.50, 95% confidence interval: 0.33 to 0.76) compared to AML-CNS(−) patients, with comparable disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (P = .10 and 0.20, respectively) in the two cohorts. The entire TBI-treated cohort showed an association with increased risks of grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD, bloodstream infections, and endocrine dysfunction. TBI use within the AML-CNS(+) cohort was associated with a lower relapse rate but increased risks of nonrelapse mortality and a trend of higher grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD. In this population-based analysis of pediatric patients with de novo AML undergoing HCT, TBI-based conditioning regimens did not confer an advantage in DFS or OS compared to non-TBI regimens, irrespective of CNS disease status. However, TBI use was associated with increased risks of short- and long-term comorbidities. These findings underscore the need for careful consideration of TBI in pediatric AML.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全身照射对曾累及中枢神经系统的小儿急性髓性白血病造血细胞移植结果的影响。
背景:人们对接受造血细胞移植(HCT)的急性髓性白血病(AML)患儿既往中枢神经系统(CNS)受累的影响仍不甚了解。患有中枢神经系统疾病的患者需要更多的前期中枢神经系统定向鞘内治疗,但对于是否应加强移植调理方案或既往中枢神经系统受累是否会影响 HCT 后的疗效却知之甚少。虽然全身照射(TBI)仍是小儿急性淋巴细胞白血病髓鞘消融调理的标准方案,但在小儿急性髓细胞白血病中,它已基本被单纯化疗髓鞘消融所取代,这主要是由于TBI的毒性和后期影响。有人认为,在中枢神经系统曾受累的情况下,基于 TBI 的髓减低化疗可能具有优势,因为它能更好地穿透中枢神经系统组织,从而降低 HCT 后急性髓细胞白血病的复发率:我们分析了来自国际血液和骨髓移植研究中心(CIBMTR)登记处的公开数据集,以确定TBI对有中枢神经系统受累史的小儿AML患者HCT准备方案的影响:研究数据集来自 CIBMTR 数据库。研究队列包括年龄≤21岁、在2008年至2016年期间因第一次或第二次完全缓解的新生急性髓细胞性白血病接受初次异基因造血干细胞移植并进行髓鞘剥脱调理的患者,这些患者均同意接受研究。不包括错配相关供体移植和非钙神经蛋白抑制剂预防移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的患者。通过排除疾病部位数据缺失的患者或患有非中枢神经系统髓外疾病的患者,对数据集进行了进一步修改。根据诊断时的疾病状态,将患者分为中枢神经系统阳性或阴性 AML(分别为 AML-CNS(+) 和 AML-CNS(-))。研究采用了Cox回归模型和Fine Grey方法来描述TBI和中枢神经系统疾病对HCT主要结果的影响:研究队列包括550名儿科急性髓细胞白血病患者,其中25%(n =136)为AML-CNS(+)。中枢神经系统受累多见于0-3岁的患者、第二次完全缓解的患者以及非血缘关系供者或脐带血不匹配的患者。与AML-CNS(-)患者相比,AML-CNS(+)患者的复发率较低(危险比[HR]:0.50,95%置信区间:0.33-0.76),两组患者的无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)相当(P分别为0.10和0.20)。整个接受过 TBI 治疗的队列显示,2-4 级急性 GVHD、血液感染和内分泌功能障碍的风险增加。在AML-CNS(+)队列中使用TBI与较低的复发率相关,但非复发死亡率风险增加,3-4级急性GVHD呈上升趋势:结论:在这项针对接受造血干细胞移植的新生急性髓细胞性白血病儿科患者的人群分析中,与非TBI方案相比,无论中枢神经系统疾病状况如何,基于TBI的调理方案在DFS或OS方面都没有优势。然而,TBI的使用与短期和长期合并症风险的增加有关。这些发现强调了在小儿急性髓细胞白血病治疗中慎重考虑TBI的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
15.60%
发文量
1061
审稿时长
51 days
期刊最新文献
Advanced Practice Providers in Cellular Therapy: survey results from the ASTCT APP Special Interest Group exploring clinical roles, compensation and job satisfaction. Healthcare resource utilization and associated costs in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in England: HCRU and associated costs in patients with cGvHD in England. Superior survival after unrelated allogeneic stem cell transplantation with low-dose ATG compared to low-dose TBI in myeloablative fludarabine/busulfan-based regimen for MDS on behalf of the adult MDS Working Group of the JSTCT. N-803, an IL-15 superagonist complex as maintenance therapy after allogeneic donor stem cell transplant for acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome; a Phase 2 trial. Biologically Randomized Comparison of Haploidentical Versus Human Leukocyte Antigen-Matched Related Donor Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1