Analysis of meiotic recombination in Drosophila simulans shows no evidence of an interchromosomal effect.

IF 3.3 3区 生物学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Genetics Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1093/genetics/iyae084
Bowen Man, Elizabeth Kim, Alekhya Vadlakonda, David L Stern, K Nicole Crown
{"title":"Analysis of meiotic recombination in Drosophila simulans shows no evidence of an interchromosomal effect.","authors":"Bowen Man, Elizabeth Kim, Alekhya Vadlakonda, David L Stern, K Nicole Crown","doi":"10.1093/genetics/iyae084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chromosome inversions are of unique importance in the evolution of genomes and species because when heterozygous with a standard arrangement chromosome, they suppress meiotic crossovers within the inversion. In Drosophila species, heterozygous inversions also cause the interchromosomal effect, whereby the presence of a heterozygous inversion induces a dramatic increase in crossover frequencies in the remainder of the genome within a single meiosis. To date, the interchromosomal effect has been studied exclusively in species that also have high frequencies of inversions in wild populations. We took advantage of a recently developed approach for generating inversions in Drosophila simulans, a species that does not have inversions in wild populations, to ask if there is an interchromosomal effect. We used the existing chromosome 3R balancer and generated a new chromosome 2L balancer to assay for the interchromosomal effect genetically and cytologically. We found no evidence of an interchromosomal effect in D. simulans. To gain insights into the underlying mechanistic reasons, we qualitatively analyzed the relationship between meiotic double-stranded break (DSB) formation and synaptonemal complex (SC) assembly. We found that the SC is assembled prior to DSB formation as in D. melanogaster; however, we show that the SC is assembled prior to localization of the oocyte determination factor Orb, whereas in D. melanogaster, SC formation does not begin until the Orb is localized. Together, our data show no evidence that heterozygous inversions in D. simulans induce an interchromosomal effect and that there are differences in the developmental programming of the early stages of meiosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48925,"journal":{"name":"Genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11304986/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyae084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chromosome inversions are of unique importance in the evolution of genomes and species because when heterozygous with a standard arrangement chromosome, they suppress meiotic crossovers within the inversion. In Drosophila species, heterozygous inversions also cause the interchromosomal effect, whereby the presence of a heterozygous inversion induces a dramatic increase in crossover frequencies in the remainder of the genome within a single meiosis. To date, the interchromosomal effect has been studied exclusively in species that also have high frequencies of inversions in wild populations. We took advantage of a recently developed approach for generating inversions in Drosophila simulans, a species that does not have inversions in wild populations, to ask if there is an interchromosomal effect. We used the existing chromosome 3R balancer and generated a new chromosome 2L balancer to assay for the interchromosomal effect genetically and cytologically. We found no evidence of an interchromosomal effect in D. simulans. To gain insights into the underlying mechanistic reasons, we qualitatively analyzed the relationship between meiotic double-stranded break (DSB) formation and synaptonemal complex (SC) assembly. We found that the SC is assembled prior to DSB formation as in D. melanogaster; however, we show that the SC is assembled prior to localization of the oocyte determination factor Orb, whereas in D. melanogaster, SC formation does not begin until the Orb is localized. Together, our data show no evidence that heterozygous inversions in D. simulans induce an interchromosomal effect and that there are differences in the developmental programming of the early stages of meiosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对模拟果蝇减数分裂重组的分析表明,没有证据表明存在染色体间效应。
染色体倒位在基因组和物种进化中具有独特的重要性,因为当染色体倒位与标准排列染色体杂合时,它们会抑制倒位内的减数分裂交叉。在果蝇物种中,杂合倒位还会导致染色体间效应,即杂合倒位的存在会在一次减数分裂中导致基因组其余部分的交叉频率急剧增加。迄今为止,人们只在野生种群中发生高频率倒位的物种中研究过染色体间效应。我们利用最近开发的一种在野生种群中没有倒位现象的果蝇中产生倒位的方法,来探究是否存在染色体间效应。我们使用了现有的 3R 染色体平衡子,并生成了一个新的 2L 染色体平衡子,以从遗传学和细胞学角度检测染色体间效应。我们在 D. 拟南芥中没有发现染色体间效应的证据。为了深入了解其潜在的机理原因,我们定性分析了减数分裂双链断裂形成与突触复合体组装之间的关系。我们发现,与黑腹蝇子一样,突触复合体在双链断裂形成之前就已经组装完成;但是,我们发现突触复合体在卵母细胞决定因子Orb定位之前就已经组装完成,而在黑腹蝇子中,突触复合体的形成要等到Orb定位之后才开始。总之,我们的数据表明,没有证据表明D. simulans中的杂合倒位会引起染色体间效应,而且减数分裂早期阶段的发育程序也存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genetics
Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
177
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GENETICS is published by the Genetics Society of America, a scholarly society that seeks to deepen our understanding of the living world by advancing our understanding of genetics. Since 1916, GENETICS has published high-quality, original research presenting novel findings bearing on genetics and genomics. The journal publishes empirical studies of organisms ranging from microbes to humans, as well as theoretical work. While it has an illustrious history, GENETICS has changed along with the communities it serves: it is not your mentor''s journal. The editors make decisions quickly – in around 30 days – without sacrificing the excellence and scholarship for which the journal has long been known. GENETICS is a peer reviewed, peer-edited journal, with an international reach and increasing visibility and impact. All editorial decisions are made through collaboration of at least two editors who are practicing scientists. GENETICS is constantly innovating: expanded types of content include Reviews, Commentary (current issues of interest to geneticists), Perspectives (historical), Primers (to introduce primary literature into the classroom), Toolbox Reviews, plus YeastBook, FlyBook, and WormBook (coming spring 2016). For particularly time-sensitive results, we publish Communications. As part of our mission to serve our communities, we''ve published thematic collections, including Genomic Selection, Multiparental Populations, Mouse Collaborative Cross, and the Genetics of Sex.
期刊最新文献
Balancing selfing and outcrossing: the genetics and cell biology of nematodes with three sexual morphs. Allopolyploidy expanded gene content but not pangenomic variation in the hexaploid oilseed Camelina sativa. The recombination landscape of the barn owl, from families to populations. Network hub gene detection using the entire solution path information. A path integral approach for allele frequency dynamics under polygenic selection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1