Work-Related Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for racially and economically diverse unemployed persons with social anxiety: A randomized clinical trial

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Anxiety Disorders Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102875
Joseph A. Himle , Richard T. LeBeau , Jennifer M. Jester , Amy M. Kilbourne , Addie Weaver , Daphne M. Brydon , Katherine M. Tucker , Nicole Hamameh , Natalie Castriotta , Michelle G. Craske
{"title":"Work-Related Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for racially and economically diverse unemployed persons with social anxiety: A randomized clinical trial","authors":"Joseph A. Himle ,&nbsp;Richard T. LeBeau ,&nbsp;Jennifer M. Jester ,&nbsp;Amy M. Kilbourne ,&nbsp;Addie Weaver ,&nbsp;Daphne M. Brydon ,&nbsp;Katherine M. Tucker ,&nbsp;Nicole Hamameh ,&nbsp;Natalie Castriotta ,&nbsp;Michelle G. Craske","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Individuals with Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) are at risk for employment problems. This multi-site trial examined the efficacy of <u>W</u>ork-Related <u>C</u>ognitive <u>B</u>ehavioral <u>T</u>herapy provided alongside <u>v</u>ocational <u>s</u>ervices <u>a</u>s <u>u</u>sual (WCBT+VSAU), a group-based treatment designed to improve mental health and employment outcomes for individuals with SAD. Vocational service-seeking participants with SAD (N = 250) were randomized to either WCBT+VSAU or VSAU-alone. Hypotheses were that participants randomized to WCBT+VSAU would report less social anxiety, less depression, and more hours worked than participants randomized to VSAU-alone. WCBT+VSAU participants had significantly greater improvements on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS; <em>d</em>=−.25, CI=−0.49 to −0.02, p = .03) at post-assessment compared to VSAU-alone. The conditions did not differ on any variable at later time points or on secondary outcomes. Unexpectedly, participants randomized to VSAU-alone experienced LSAS improvements, similar to WCBT+VASU at later timepoints. Baseline psychological flexibility (beta=−.098 [−0.19–0.008]) and depression (beta=−0.18 [−0.34–0.009]) moderated change in social anxiety. Participants with lower psychological flexibility and higher depression responded more strongly to WCBT+VSAU than VSAU-alone over the duration of the study, suggesting that WCBT+VSAU may particularly benefit those with greater psychopathology. Results indicate that vocational centers are promising settings for treating SAD and employment-focused refinements are likely needed to improve work outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 102875"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618524000513","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals with Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) are at risk for employment problems. This multi-site trial examined the efficacy of Work-Related Cognitive Behavioral Therapy provided alongside vocational services as usual (WCBT+VSAU), a group-based treatment designed to improve mental health and employment outcomes for individuals with SAD. Vocational service-seeking participants with SAD (N = 250) were randomized to either WCBT+VSAU or VSAU-alone. Hypotheses were that participants randomized to WCBT+VSAU would report less social anxiety, less depression, and more hours worked than participants randomized to VSAU-alone. WCBT+VSAU participants had significantly greater improvements on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS; d=−.25, CI=−0.49 to −0.02, p = .03) at post-assessment compared to VSAU-alone. The conditions did not differ on any variable at later time points or on secondary outcomes. Unexpectedly, participants randomized to VSAU-alone experienced LSAS improvements, similar to WCBT+VASU at later timepoints. Baseline psychological flexibility (beta=−.098 [−0.19–0.008]) and depression (beta=−0.18 [−0.34–0.009]) moderated change in social anxiety. Participants with lower psychological flexibility and higher depression responded more strongly to WCBT+VSAU than VSAU-alone over the duration of the study, suggesting that WCBT+VSAU may particularly benefit those with greater psychopathology. Results indicate that vocational centers are promising settings for treating SAD and employment-focused refinements are likely needed to improve work outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对不同种族和经济背景的社交焦虑失业者的工作相关认知行为疗法:随机临床试验。
社交焦虑症(SAD)患者面临就业问题的风险。这项多站点试验研究了与工作相关的认知行为疗法(Work-Related Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)与常规职业服务(WCBT+VSAU)的疗效,后者是一种以小组为基础的治疗方法,旨在改善社交焦虑症患者的心理健康和就业结果。寻求职业服务的 SAD 患者(人数 = 250)被随机分配到 WCBT+VSAU 或 VSAU-单独治疗中。我们的假设是,随机接受 WCBT+VSAU 治疗的患者将比单独接受 VSAU 治疗的患者报告更少的社交焦虑、更少的抑郁和更多的工作时间。与单独使用 VSAU 相比,WCBT+VSAU 参与者在评估后的利博维茨社交焦虑量表(LSAS;d=-.25,CI=-0.49 至-0.02,p = .03)上有明显改善。在以后的时间点或次要结果上,两种方法在任何变量上都没有差异。出乎意料的是,在后来的时间点上,随机接受VSAU-单项治疗的参与者的LSAS有所改善,与WCBT+VASU相似。基线心理灵活性(β=-.098 [-0.19-0.008])和抑郁(β=-0.18 [-0.34-0.009])调节了社交焦虑的变化。在研究过程中,心理灵活性较低和抑郁程度较高的参与者对 WCBT+VSAU 的反应比单独使用 VSAU 更强烈,这表明 WCBT+VSAU 尤其能使那些心理病态程度较高的人受益。研究结果表明,职业中心是治疗 SAD 的理想场所,可能需要以就业为重点进行改进,以提高工作成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anxiety Disorders is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes research papers on all aspects of anxiety disorders for individuals of all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Manuscripts that focus on disorders previously classified as anxiety disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, as well as the new category of illness anxiety disorder, are also within the scope of the journal. The research areas of focus include traditional, behavioral, cognitive, and biological assessment; diagnosis and classification; psychosocial and psychopharmacological treatment; genetics; epidemiology; and prevention. The journal welcomes theoretical and review articles that significantly contribute to current knowledge in the field. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Elsevier, BIOBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Citation Index, BRS Data, Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pascal Francis, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Metacognitive therapy versus exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder – a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial” Journal of Anxiety Disorders (2024), Volume 104, June 2024, 102873 Excessive avoidance bias towards uncertain faces in non-clinical social anxiety individuals Interplay of serum BDNF levels and childhood adversity in predicting earlier-onset post-traumatic stress disorder: A two-year longitudinal study Negative emotion differentiation buffers against intergenerational risk for social anxiety in at-risk adolescent girls Intensive treatments for children and adolescents with anxiety or obsessive-compulsive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1