Jens Maurhofer MD , Hildegard Tanner MD , Thomas Kueffer MSc , Antonio Madaffari MD , Gregor Thalmann MD , Nikola Kozhuharov MD , Oskar Galuszka MD , Helge Servatius MD , Andreas Haeberlin MD, PhD , Fabian Noti MD , Laurent Roten MD , Tobias Reichlin MD
{"title":"Pulsed-field ablation for repeat procedures after failed prior thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation","authors":"Jens Maurhofer MD , Hildegard Tanner MD , Thomas Kueffer MSc , Antonio Madaffari MD , Gregor Thalmann MD , Nikola Kozhuharov MD , Oskar Galuszka MD , Helge Servatius MD , Andreas Haeberlin MD, PhD , Fabian Noti MD , Laurent Roten MD , Tobias Reichlin MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2024.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a novel nonthermal ablation technology. Its potential value for repeat procedures after unsuccessful thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation has not been assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to summarize our initial experience with patients undergoing repeat procedures using PFA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Consecutive patients with arrhythmia recurrences after a prior thermal ablation undergoing a repeat procedure using a multipolar PFA catheter from May 2021 and December 2022 were included. After 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping, reconnected pulmonary veins (PVs) were reisolated and veins with only ostial isolation wither ablated to widen antral PV isolation. Posterior wall ablation was performed if all PVs were durably isolated or in case of low-voltage areas on the posterior wall at the discretion of the operator. Patients underwent follow-up with 7-day Holter electrocardiography after 3, 6, and 12 months.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 186 patients undergoing a repeat procedure using PFA were included. The median number of previous ablations was 1 (range 1–6). The prior ablation modality was radiofrequency in 129 patients (69.4%), cryoballoon in 51 (27.4%), and epicardial ablation in 6 (3.2%). At the beginning of the procedure, 258 of 744 PVs (35%) showed reconnections. Additional antral ablations were applied in 236 of 486 still isolated veins (49%). Posterior wall ablation was added in 125 patients (67%). Major complications occurred in 1 patient (transient ischemic attack 0.5%). Freedom from arrhythmia recurrence in Kaplan-Meier-analysis was 78% after 6 months and 54% after 12 months.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>PFA is a versatile and safe option for repeat procedures after failed prior thermal ablation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"5 5","pages":"Pages 257-265"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824000941/pdfft?md5=b3562e00e57081c105b7af0e26315394&pid=1-s2.0-S2666501824000941-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824000941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a novel nonthermal ablation technology. Its potential value for repeat procedures after unsuccessful thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation has not been assessed.
Objective
The purpose of this study was to summarize our initial experience with patients undergoing repeat procedures using PFA.
Methods
Consecutive patients with arrhythmia recurrences after a prior thermal ablation undergoing a repeat procedure using a multipolar PFA catheter from May 2021 and December 2022 were included. After 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping, reconnected pulmonary veins (PVs) were reisolated and veins with only ostial isolation wither ablated to widen antral PV isolation. Posterior wall ablation was performed if all PVs were durably isolated or in case of low-voltage areas on the posterior wall at the discretion of the operator. Patients underwent follow-up with 7-day Holter electrocardiography after 3, 6, and 12 months.
Results
A total of 186 patients undergoing a repeat procedure using PFA were included. The median number of previous ablations was 1 (range 1–6). The prior ablation modality was radiofrequency in 129 patients (69.4%), cryoballoon in 51 (27.4%), and epicardial ablation in 6 (3.2%). At the beginning of the procedure, 258 of 744 PVs (35%) showed reconnections. Additional antral ablations were applied in 236 of 486 still isolated veins (49%). Posterior wall ablation was added in 125 patients (67%). Major complications occurred in 1 patient (transient ischemic attack 0.5%). Freedom from arrhythmia recurrence in Kaplan-Meier-analysis was 78% after 6 months and 54% after 12 months.
Conclusion
PFA is a versatile and safe option for repeat procedures after failed prior thermal ablation.