Pulsed-field ablation for repeat procedures after failed prior thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart Rhythm O2 Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hroo.2024.03.012
Jens Maurhofer MD , Hildegard Tanner MD , Thomas Kueffer MSc , Antonio Madaffari MD , Gregor Thalmann MD , Nikola Kozhuharov MD , Oskar Galuszka MD , Helge Servatius MD , Andreas Haeberlin MD, PhD , Fabian Noti MD , Laurent Roten MD , Tobias Reichlin MD
{"title":"Pulsed-field ablation for repeat procedures after failed prior thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation","authors":"Jens Maurhofer MD ,&nbsp;Hildegard Tanner MD ,&nbsp;Thomas Kueffer MSc ,&nbsp;Antonio Madaffari MD ,&nbsp;Gregor Thalmann MD ,&nbsp;Nikola Kozhuharov MD ,&nbsp;Oskar Galuszka MD ,&nbsp;Helge Servatius MD ,&nbsp;Andreas Haeberlin MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Fabian Noti MD ,&nbsp;Laurent Roten MD ,&nbsp;Tobias Reichlin MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2024.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a novel nonthermal ablation technology. Its potential value for repeat procedures after unsuccessful thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation has not been assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to summarize our initial experience with patients undergoing repeat procedures using PFA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Consecutive patients with arrhythmia recurrences after a prior thermal ablation undergoing a repeat procedure using a multipolar PFA catheter from May 2021 and December 2022 were included. After 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping, reconnected pulmonary veins (PVs) were reisolated and veins with only ostial isolation wither ablated to widen antral PV isolation. Posterior wall ablation was performed if all PVs were durably isolated or in case of low-voltage areas on the posterior wall at the discretion of the operator. Patients underwent follow-up with 7-day Holter electrocardiography after 3, 6, and 12 months.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 186 patients undergoing a repeat procedure using PFA were included. The median number of previous ablations was 1 (range 1–6). The prior ablation modality was radiofrequency in 129 patients (69.4%), cryoballoon in 51 (27.4%), and epicardial ablation in 6 (3.2%). At the beginning of the procedure, 258 of 744 PVs (35%) showed reconnections. Additional antral ablations were applied in 236 of 486 still isolated veins (49%). Posterior wall ablation was added in 125 patients (67%). Major complications occurred in 1 patient (transient ischemic attack 0.5%). Freedom from arrhythmia recurrence in Kaplan-Meier-analysis was 78% after 6 months and 54% after 12 months.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>PFA is a versatile and safe option for repeat procedures after failed prior thermal ablation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"5 5","pages":"Pages 257-265"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824000941/pdfft?md5=b3562e00e57081c105b7af0e26315394&pid=1-s2.0-S2666501824000941-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824000941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a novel nonthermal ablation technology. Its potential value for repeat procedures after unsuccessful thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation has not been assessed.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to summarize our initial experience with patients undergoing repeat procedures using PFA.

Methods

Consecutive patients with arrhythmia recurrences after a prior thermal ablation undergoing a repeat procedure using a multipolar PFA catheter from May 2021 and December 2022 were included. After 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping, reconnected pulmonary veins (PVs) were reisolated and veins with only ostial isolation wither ablated to widen antral PV isolation. Posterior wall ablation was performed if all PVs were durably isolated or in case of low-voltage areas on the posterior wall at the discretion of the operator. Patients underwent follow-up with 7-day Holter electrocardiography after 3, 6, and 12 months.

Results

A total of 186 patients undergoing a repeat procedure using PFA were included. The median number of previous ablations was 1 (range 1–6). The prior ablation modality was radiofrequency in 129 patients (69.4%), cryoballoon in 51 (27.4%), and epicardial ablation in 6 (3.2%). At the beginning of the procedure, 258 of 744 PVs (35%) showed reconnections. Additional antral ablations were applied in 236 of 486 still isolated veins (49%). Posterior wall ablation was added in 125 patients (67%). Major complications occurred in 1 patient (transient ischemic attack 0.5%). Freedom from arrhythmia recurrence in Kaplan-Meier-analysis was 78% after 6 months and 54% after 12 months.

Conclusion

PFA is a versatile and safe option for repeat procedures after failed prior thermal ablation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脉冲场消融术用于心房颤动热消融失败后的重复手术
背景脉冲场消融(PFA)是一种新型非热消融技术。方法纳入 2021 年 5 月至 2022 年 12 月期间使用多极 PFA 导管进行重复手术的既往热消融术后心律失常复发的连续患者。在绘制三维电解剖图后,对重新连接的肺静脉(PV)进行了重新隔离,并对仅有骨端隔离的静脉进行了消融,以扩大前腔PV隔离范围。如果所有肺静脉都被持久隔离,或者后壁出现低电压区域,则由操作者决定是否进行后壁消融。患者在 3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月后接受 7 天 Holter 心电图随访。既往消融次数的中位数为 1 次(1-6 次不等)。129 名患者(69.4%)之前的消融方式为射频,51 名患者(27.4%)之前的消融方式为冷冻球囊,6 名患者(3.2%)之前的消融方式为心外膜消融。在手术开始时,744 个上腔静脉中有 258 个(35%)出现了重新连接。在 486 条仍然孤立的静脉中,有 236 条(49%)进行了额外的前壁消融。125名患者(67%)增加了后壁消融术。1 名患者出现了重大并发症(短暂性脑缺血发作,占 0.5%)。根据 Kaplan-Meier 分析,6 个月后心律失常复发率为 78%,12 个月后为 54%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Rhythm O2
Heart Rhythm O2 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Needle-free atrial transseptal access: A safe and reproducible alternative for left atrial catheterization Differences in clinical significance of atrial tachyarrhythmias in idiopathic ventricular fibrillation vs Brugada syndrome: A multicenter study Temporal changes in device-derived daily activity related to ventricular arrhythmias from the CERTITUDE registry Ventricular arrhythmias after atrial fibrillation electrical cardioversion: A multicenter study Ventricular tachycardia: Focal pulsed field electroporation as a rescue therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1