Estimating the size and scope of the academic emergency physician workforce.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Academic Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1111/acem.14931
Cameron J Gettel, Carlos A Camargo, Christopher L Bennett, D Mark Courtney, Amy H Kaji, Gregory J Fermann, Fiona E Gallahue, Lewis S Nelson, Carleigh F Hebbard, Craig Rothenberg, Ali S Raja, Arjun K Venkatesh
{"title":"Estimating the size and scope of the academic emergency physician workforce.","authors":"Cameron J Gettel, Carlos A Camargo, Christopher L Bennett, D Mark Courtney, Amy H Kaji, Gregory J Fermann, Fiona E Gallahue, Lewis S Nelson, Carleigh F Hebbard, Craig Rothenberg, Ali S Raja, Arjun K Venkatesh","doi":"10.1111/acem.14931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Academic emergency medicine (EM) is foundational to the EM specialty through the development of new knowledge and clinical training of resident physicians. Despite recent increased attention to the future of the EM workforce, no evaluations have specifically characterized the U.S. academic EM workforce. We sought to estimate the national proportion of emergency physicians (EPs) identified as academic and the proportion of emergency department (ED) visits that take place at academic sites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cross-sectional analysis of EPs and EDs using data from the American Hospital Association, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and Doximity's Residency Navigator. EPs were identified as \"academic\" if they were affiliated with at least one facility determined to be academic, defined as EDs officially designated by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) as clinical training sites at accredited EM residency programs. Our primary outcomes were to estimate the national proportion of EPs identified as academic and the proportion of ED visits performed at academic sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analytic sample included 26,937 EPs practicing clinically across 4920 EDs and providing care during 130,471,386 ED visits. Among EPs, 11,720 (43.5%) were identified as academic, and among EDs, 635 (12.9%) were identified as academic sites, including 585 adult/general sites, 45 pediatric-specific sites, and 10 sites affiliated with the Department of Veterans Affairs. In 2021, academic EDs provided care for 42,794,106 ED visits or 32.8% of all ED visits nationally.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Approximately four in 10 EPs practice in at least one clinical training site affiliated with an ACGME-accredited EM residency program, and approximately one in three ED visits nationally occur in these academic EDs. We encourage further work using alternative definitions of an academic EPs and EDs, along with longitudinal research to identify trends in the workforce's composition.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"732-738"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.14931","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Academic emergency medicine (EM) is foundational to the EM specialty through the development of new knowledge and clinical training of resident physicians. Despite recent increased attention to the future of the EM workforce, no evaluations have specifically characterized the U.S. academic EM workforce. We sought to estimate the national proportion of emergency physicians (EPs) identified as academic and the proportion of emergency department (ED) visits that take place at academic sites.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of EPs and EDs using data from the American Hospital Association, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and Doximity's Residency Navigator. EPs were identified as "academic" if they were affiliated with at least one facility determined to be academic, defined as EDs officially designated by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) as clinical training sites at accredited EM residency programs. Our primary outcomes were to estimate the national proportion of EPs identified as academic and the proportion of ED visits performed at academic sites.

Results: Our analytic sample included 26,937 EPs practicing clinically across 4920 EDs and providing care during 130,471,386 ED visits. Among EPs, 11,720 (43.5%) were identified as academic, and among EDs, 635 (12.9%) were identified as academic sites, including 585 adult/general sites, 45 pediatric-specific sites, and 10 sites affiliated with the Department of Veterans Affairs. In 2021, academic EDs provided care for 42,794,106 ED visits or 32.8% of all ED visits nationally.

Conclusions: Approximately four in 10 EPs practice in at least one clinical training site affiliated with an ACGME-accredited EM residency program, and approximately one in three ED visits nationally occur in these academic EDs. We encourage further work using alternative definitions of an academic EPs and EDs, along with longitudinal research to identify trends in the workforce's composition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估计学术急诊医生队伍的规模和范围。
背景:急诊医学(EM)学术通过开发新知识和对住院医生进行临床培训,为急诊医学专业奠定了基础。尽管最近人们越来越关注急诊医学人才队伍的未来,但却没有对美国学术急诊医学人才队伍的具体特点进行评估。我们试图估算全国被认定为学术型的急诊医生(EPs)的比例,以及在学术型医院急诊科(ED)就诊的比例:我们利用美国医院协会、医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心以及 Doximity 的住院医生导航仪提供的数据,对急诊医生和急诊室进行了横向分析。如果急诊科至少隶属于一家被认定为学术性的医疗机构,则被认定为 "学术性 "急诊科,学术性急诊科的定义是由美国毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)正式指定的急诊科,是经认可的急诊科住院医师培训项目的临床培训基地。我们的主要结果是估算全国被认定为学术性急诊科的比例以及在学术性急诊科就诊的比例:我们的分析样本包括在 4920 家急诊室从事临床工作的 26,937 名急诊医生,他们在 130,471,386 次急诊就诊中提供了医疗服务。在急救医生中,有 11720 人(43.5%)被认定为学术型;在急诊室中,有 635 人(12.9%)被认定为学术型,其中包括 585 个成人/普通急诊室、45 个儿科急诊室和 10 个隶属于退伍军人事务部的急诊室。2021 年,学术性急诊室为 42,794,106 人次的急诊就诊提供了医疗服务,占全国急诊就诊总人次的 32.8%:大约每10名急诊医生中就有4名在至少一个隶属于ACGME认证的急诊科住院医师培训项目的临床培训基地工作,全国大约每3次急诊就有1次发生在这些学术性急诊中。我们鼓励进一步研究学术性急诊科医生和急诊室的其他定义,并开展纵向研究,以确定医生队伍构成的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Can first impressions predict patient outcomes? Epidemiology of sepsis presentations and management among United States emergency departments from 2016 to 2023. Ruling out pulmonary embolism safely: Standardized reporting of the failure rate. Opening invisible wounds. Failure rate of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria rule for adults 35 years or younger: Findings from the RIETE Registry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1