Do advanced cancer patients and their caregivers agree on preferred place of patient's death?-a prospective cohort study of patient-caregiver dyads.

4区 医学 Q2 Nursing Annals of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-14 DOI:10.21037/apm-23-496
Chetna Malhotra, Wei Sheng Loo, Isha Chaudhry
{"title":"Do advanced cancer patients and their caregivers agree on preferred place of patient's death?-a prospective cohort study of patient-caregiver dyads.","authors":"Chetna Malhotra, Wei Sheng Loo, Isha Chaudhry","doi":"10.21037/apm-23-496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Greater patient-caregiver concordance for preferred place of death can increase the chances of patients dying at their preferred place, thus improving quality of life at end-of-life (EOL). We aimed to assess changes in and predictors of patient-caregiver concordance in preference for home death at EOL during the last 3 years of life of patients with advanced cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the Cost of Medical Care of Patients with Advanced Serious Illness in Singapore (COMPASS) cohort study of patients with stage IV solid cancer. We interviewed patients and their caregivers every 4 months to assess their preference for home death (for patient), and patient (symptom burden, inpatient usage, financial difficulties) and caregiver (psychosocial distress, spiritual wellbeing, competency and perceived lack of family support) characteristics. We used data from patients' last 3 years of life. We used multivariable multinomial logistic regressions to predict dyad concordance for preference for home death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 227 patient-caregiver dyads were analyzed. More than half of the patient-caregiver dyads observations were concordant in their preference for home death (54%). Concordance for home death declined closer to death (from 68% to 44%). Concordant dyads who preferred home death were less likely to include older patients [relative risk ratio, 0.97; P=0.03]. Dyads who preferred a non-home death (hospital, hospice, nursing home, unsure or others) were more likely to include patients with greater symptom burden (1.08; P=0.007) and with spousal caregivers (2.59; P=0.050), and less likely to include caregivers with greater psychosocial distress (0.90; P=0.003) and higher spiritual wellbeing (0.92; P=0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides evidence of the dynamic changes in preference for home death among patient-caregiver dyads during last 3 years of patients' life. Understanding the EOL needs of older patients, optimizing home-based symptom control and better caregiver support are recommended to increase likelihood of dyad concordance for home death.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"531-541"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-23-496","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Greater patient-caregiver concordance for preferred place of death can increase the chances of patients dying at their preferred place, thus improving quality of life at end-of-life (EOL). We aimed to assess changes in and predictors of patient-caregiver concordance in preference for home death at EOL during the last 3 years of life of patients with advanced cancer.

Methods: We used data from the Cost of Medical Care of Patients with Advanced Serious Illness in Singapore (COMPASS) cohort study of patients with stage IV solid cancer. We interviewed patients and their caregivers every 4 months to assess their preference for home death (for patient), and patient (symptom burden, inpatient usage, financial difficulties) and caregiver (psychosocial distress, spiritual wellbeing, competency and perceived lack of family support) characteristics. We used data from patients' last 3 years of life. We used multivariable multinomial logistic regressions to predict dyad concordance for preference for home death.

Results: A total of 227 patient-caregiver dyads were analyzed. More than half of the patient-caregiver dyads observations were concordant in their preference for home death (54%). Concordance for home death declined closer to death (from 68% to 44%). Concordant dyads who preferred home death were less likely to include older patients [relative risk ratio, 0.97; P=0.03]. Dyads who preferred a non-home death (hospital, hospice, nursing home, unsure or others) were more likely to include patients with greater symptom burden (1.08; P=0.007) and with spousal caregivers (2.59; P=0.050), and less likely to include caregivers with greater psychosocial distress (0.90; P=0.003) and higher spiritual wellbeing (0.92; P=0.007).

Conclusions: This study provides evidence of the dynamic changes in preference for home death among patient-caregiver dyads during last 3 years of patients' life. Understanding the EOL needs of older patients, optimizing home-based symptom control and better caregiver support are recommended to increase likelihood of dyad concordance for home death.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期癌症患者及其照护者是否就患者的首选死亡地点达成一致?
背景:患者与护理人员对首选死亡地点的一致性越高,患者在首选地点死亡的几率就越大,从而提高生命末期(EOL)的生活质量。我们的目的是评估晚期癌症患者在生命最后 3 年中,患者和护理人员对在家死亡的偏好是否一致的变化和预测因素:我们使用了新加坡晚期重症患者医疗护理成本(COMPASS)队列研究中的数据,研究对象为 IV 期实体瘤患者。我们每 4 个月对患者及其护理人员进行一次访谈,以评估他们对居家死亡的偏好(对患者而言)、患者(症状负担、住院使用情况、经济困难)和护理人员(社会心理困扰、精神健康、能力和感知到的家庭支持缺乏)的特征。我们使用了患者生命最后 3 年的数据。我们使用多变量多项式逻辑回归来预测双方对居家死亡偏好的一致性:结果:共分析了 227 个患者-护理者二元组。在观察到的患者-护理者二元组中,有一半以上(54%)对居家死亡的偏好是一致的。临近死亡时,居家死亡的一致性下降(从 68% 降至 44%)。倾向于居家死亡的一致二人组不太可能包括老年患者[相对风险比,0.97;P=0.03]。倾向于非居家死亡(医院、临终关怀、疗养院、不确定或其他)的二人组更有可能包括症状负担较重的患者(1.08;P=0.007)和有配偶照顾者的患者(2.59;P=0.050),而较少可能包括心理社会痛苦较重(0.90;P=0.003)和精神健康较高(0.92;P=0.007)的照顾者:本研究提供了证据,证明在患者生命的最后 3 年中,患者-护理者二元组对居家死亡的偏好发生了动态变化。建议了解老年患者的临终需求,优化居家症状控制,并为护理人员提供更好的支持,以提高患者和护理人员一致选择居家死亡的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of palliative medicine
Annals of palliative medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
231
期刊介绍: Annals of Palliative Medicine (Ann Palliat Med; Print ISSN 2224-5820; Online ISSN 2224-5839) is an open access, international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly with both online and printed copies since 2012. The aim of the journal is to provide up-to-date and cutting-edge information and professional support for health care providers in palliative medicine disciplines to improve the quality of life for patients and their families and caregivers.
期刊最新文献
A narrative review of the challenges and impact of breast cancer treatment in older adults beyond cancer diagnosis. Palliative care and hepatobiliary malignancies: say no to late referral. Stepped palliative care: considerations for equitable implementation. Breast cancer survivorship care: a narrative review of challenges and future directions. Surveillance of patients after palliative radiation, how to make it feasible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1