Effectiveness and Acceptability of Interventions Offered for Those Bereaved by Parental Loss to Suicide in Childhood: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Archives of Suicide Research Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1080/13811118.2024.2351101
Frances Graham, Warren Bartik, Sarah Wayland, Myfanwy Maple
{"title":"Effectiveness and Acceptability of Interventions Offered for Those Bereaved by Parental Loss to Suicide in Childhood: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review.","authors":"Frances Graham, Warren Bartik, Sarah Wayland, Myfanwy Maple","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2351101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Identify interventions offered for children bereaved by parental suicide, investigate reported effectiveness and explore the acceptability of identified interventions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Six electronic databases were systematically searched for primary studies investigating intervention effectiveness and acceptability, (August 2011 to June 2023). Eligibility required inclusion of participants bereaved by parental suicide during childhood among sample populations. Methodological quality was evaluated applying JBI critical appraisal tools. Narrative synthesis was conducted using parallel-results convergent design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 22 eligible reports, 19 articles reported on 12 manual-based supports provided during childhood; three papers described users' experiences of various specified intervention types offered following childhood loss. Twenty-one studies reported on interventions offered for heterogeneous participant groups that included children bereaved by parental suicide. Time from loss to intervention generally included both recent (1 < 30mths) and more distant loss, with just one intervention described as solely for recently bereaved children. Eight interventions (<i>n</i> = 12 studies) demonstrated significant positive effects (p < 0.05), for maladaptive grief, mental health, quality of life. Only one study investigated suicide-related outcomes. Qualitative findings (n = 8 studies) facilitated development of four acceptability themes: Perceived utility, Relationships, Components and Delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Heterogeneity in causes of loss/trauma and relationships with the deceased limit specific conclusions regarding effectiveness/acceptability of reviewed interventions for children bereaved by parental suicide. Few sub-group analyses of effects were reported, and qualitative evidence specifically from children bereaved by parental suicide was limited. Further research is recommended regarding mixed-user interventions, specifically for children bereaved by parental suicide.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Suicide Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2351101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Identify interventions offered for children bereaved by parental suicide, investigate reported effectiveness and explore the acceptability of identified interventions.

Method: Six electronic databases were systematically searched for primary studies investigating intervention effectiveness and acceptability, (August 2011 to June 2023). Eligibility required inclusion of participants bereaved by parental suicide during childhood among sample populations. Methodological quality was evaluated applying JBI critical appraisal tools. Narrative synthesis was conducted using parallel-results convergent design.

Results: Of the 22 eligible reports, 19 articles reported on 12 manual-based supports provided during childhood; three papers described users' experiences of various specified intervention types offered following childhood loss. Twenty-one studies reported on interventions offered for heterogeneous participant groups that included children bereaved by parental suicide. Time from loss to intervention generally included both recent (1 < 30mths) and more distant loss, with just one intervention described as solely for recently bereaved children. Eight interventions (n = 12 studies) demonstrated significant positive effects (p < 0.05), for maladaptive grief, mental health, quality of life. Only one study investigated suicide-related outcomes. Qualitative findings (n = 8 studies) facilitated development of four acceptability themes: Perceived utility, Relationships, Components and Delivery.

Conclusions: Heterogeneity in causes of loss/trauma and relationships with the deceased limit specific conclusions regarding effectiveness/acceptability of reviewed interventions for children bereaved by parental suicide. Few sub-group analyses of effects were reported, and qualitative evidence specifically from children bereaved by parental suicide was limited. Further research is recommended regarding mixed-user interventions, specifically for children bereaved by parental suicide.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为失去父母的儿童自杀者提供干预的有效性和可接受性:混合方法系统综述》。
目标:确定为因父母自杀而失去亲人的儿童提供的干预措施:确定为因父母自杀而失去亲人的儿童提供的干预措施,调查报告的有效性,并探索已确定干预措施的可接受性:方法:系统检索了六个电子数据库,以查找调查干预有效性和可接受性的主要研究(2011 年 8 月至 2023 年 6 月)。研究资格要求样本人群中包含童年时期因父母自杀而丧亲的参与者。采用 JBI 关键评估工具对方法学质量进行评估。采用平行结果收敛设计进行叙述性综合:在 22 篇符合条件的报告中,19 篇报告了童年时期提供的 12 种基于手册的支持;3 篇论文描述了用户在童年丧亲后对各种特定干预类型的体验。21 项研究报告了为不同参与者群体提供的干预措施,其中包括因父母自杀而失去亲人的儿童。从失去亲人到采取干预措施的时间一般包括近期(1 n = 12 项研究)和远期(1 n = 12 项研究),这两项研究都显示出了显著的积极效果(p 结论):失去亲人/遭受创伤的原因以及与逝者关系的异质性,限制了针对父母自杀丧子儿童的干预措施有效性/可接受性的具体结论。很少有对干预效果进行亚组分析的报告,而专门针对父母自杀后丧子儿童的定性证据也很有限。建议进一步研究混合使用者干预措施,特别是针对父母自杀后丧子儿童的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Archives of Suicide Research, the official journal of the International Academy of Suicide Research (IASR), is the international journal in the field of suicidology. The journal features original, refereed contributions on the study of suicide, suicidal behavior, its causes and effects, and techniques for prevention. The journal incorporates research-based and theoretical articles contributed by a diverse range of authors interested in investigating the biological, pharmacological, psychiatric, psychological, and sociological aspects of suicide.
期刊最新文献
Barriers to Youth Disclosing Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors: A Focus on the Therapeutic Context. Firearm Availability Reduces the Stability of Suicidal Ideation: Results from an Ecological Momentary Assessment Study. Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Mediate the Relationship Between Poor Sleep Quality and Suicidal Ideation Among Young Chinese Men. Correction. Perinatal Factors and Their Association with Early-Adulthood Suicidal Behavior in a Brazilian Birth Cohort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1