Differing contributions of the gut microbiota to the blood pressure lowering effects induced by first-line antihypertensive drugs

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY British Journal of Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1111/bph.16410
Cristina González-Correa, Javier Moleón, Sofía Miñano, Iñaki Robles-Vera, Marta Toral, Antonio Manuel Barranco, Natividad Martín-Morales, Francisco O'Valle, Eduardo Guerra-Hernández, Manuel Sánchez, Manuel Gómez-Guzmán, Rosario Jiménez, Miguel Romero, Juan Duarte
{"title":"Differing contributions of the gut microbiota to the blood pressure lowering effects induced by first-line antihypertensive drugs","authors":"Cristina González-Correa,&nbsp;Javier Moleón,&nbsp;Sofía Miñano,&nbsp;Iñaki Robles-Vera,&nbsp;Marta Toral,&nbsp;Antonio Manuel Barranco,&nbsp;Natividad Martín-Morales,&nbsp;Francisco O'Valle,&nbsp;Eduardo Guerra-Hernández,&nbsp;Manuel Sánchez,&nbsp;Manuel Gómez-Guzmán,&nbsp;Rosario Jiménez,&nbsp;Miguel Romero,&nbsp;Juan Duarte","doi":"10.1111/bph.16410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study analyses whether first-line antihypertensive drugs ameliorate the dysbiosis state in hypertension, and to test if this modification contributes to their blood pressure (BP) lowering properties in a genetic model of neurogenic hypertension.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Experimental Approach</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-week-old male Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY) and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were untreated or treated with captopril, amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide. A faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) experiment was also performed by gavage of faecal content from donor SHR-treated groups to SHR recipients for 3 weeks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Key results</h3>\n \n <p>Faeces from SHR showed gut dysbiosis, characterized by lower acetate- and higher lactate-producing bacteria and lower strict anaerobic bacteria. All three drugs increased the anaerobic bacteria proportion, captopril and amlodipine restored the proportion of acetate-producing bacterial populations to WKY levels, whereas hydrochlorothiazide decreased butyrate-producing bacteria. Captopril and amlodipine decreased gut pathology and permeability and attenuated sympathetic drive in the gut. Both drugs decreased neuroinflammation and oxidative stress in the hypothalamic paraventricular nuclei. Hydrochlorothiazide was unable to reduce neuroinflammation, gut sympathetic tone and gut integrity. FMT from SHR-amlodipine to SHR decreased BP, ameliorated aortic endothelium-dependent relaxation to acetylcholine, lowered NADPH oxidase activity, aortic Th17 infiltration and reduced neuroinflammation, whereas FMT from SHR-hydrochlorothiazide did not have these effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions and Implications</h3>\n \n <p>First-line antihypertensive drugs induced different modifications of gut integrity and gut dysbiosis in SHR, which result in no contribution of microbiota in the BP lowering effects of hydrochlorothiazide, whereas the vasculo-protective effect induced by amlodipine involves gut microbiota reshaping and gut-immune system communication.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9262,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bph.16410","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.16410","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose

This study analyses whether first-line antihypertensive drugs ameliorate the dysbiosis state in hypertension, and to test if this modification contributes to their blood pressure (BP) lowering properties in a genetic model of neurogenic hypertension.

Experimental Approach

Twenty-week-old male Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY) and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were untreated or treated with captopril, amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide. A faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) experiment was also performed by gavage of faecal content from donor SHR-treated groups to SHR recipients for 3 weeks.

Key results

Faeces from SHR showed gut dysbiosis, characterized by lower acetate- and higher lactate-producing bacteria and lower strict anaerobic bacteria. All three drugs increased the anaerobic bacteria proportion, captopril and amlodipine restored the proportion of acetate-producing bacterial populations to WKY levels, whereas hydrochlorothiazide decreased butyrate-producing bacteria. Captopril and amlodipine decreased gut pathology and permeability and attenuated sympathetic drive in the gut. Both drugs decreased neuroinflammation and oxidative stress in the hypothalamic paraventricular nuclei. Hydrochlorothiazide was unable to reduce neuroinflammation, gut sympathetic tone and gut integrity. FMT from SHR-amlodipine to SHR decreased BP, ameliorated aortic endothelium-dependent relaxation to acetylcholine, lowered NADPH oxidase activity, aortic Th17 infiltration and reduced neuroinflammation, whereas FMT from SHR-hydrochlorothiazide did not have these effects.

Conclusions and Implications

First-line antihypertensive drugs induced different modifications of gut integrity and gut dysbiosis in SHR, which result in no contribution of microbiota in the BP lowering effects of hydrochlorothiazide, whereas the vasculo-protective effect induced by amlodipine involves gut microbiota reshaping and gut-immune system communication.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肠道微生物群对一线降压药降压效果的不同贡献。
背景和目的:本研究分析了一线降压药物是否能改善高血压的菌群失调状态,并检验这种改变是否有助于它们在神经源性高血压遗传模型中的降压特性:实验方法:20 周大的雄性 Wistar Kyoto 大鼠(WKY)和自发性高血压大鼠(SHR)未经处理或用卡托普利、氨氯地平或氢氯噻嗪处理。还进行了粪便微生物群移植(FMT)实验,将供体SHR处理组的粪便内容物灌胃给SHR受体,为期3周:主要结果:SHR 的粪便显示肠道菌群失调,其特点是醋酸菌和乳酸菌产生率较低,严格厌氧菌较多。三种药物都会增加厌氧菌的比例,卡托普利和氨氯地平会使产生醋酸的细菌群比例恢复到 WKY 水平,而氢氯噻嗪会减少产生丁酸的细菌。卡托普利和氨氯地平降低了肠道病理和通透性,减轻了肠道的交感驱动。两种药物都能减少下丘脑室旁核的神经炎症和氧化应激。氢氯噻嗪不能减轻神经炎症、肠道交感神经张力和肠道完整性。SHR-amlodipine 至 SHR 的 FMT 降低了血压,改善了乙酰胆碱依赖性主动脉内皮松弛,降低了 NADPH 氧化酶活性、主动脉 Th17 浸润并减少了神经炎症,而 SHR-hydrochlorothiazide 的 FMT 没有这些效果:一线降压药诱导了SHR肠道完整性的不同改变和肠道菌群失调,这导致微生物群在氢氯噻嗪的降压效应中没有贡献,而氨氯地平诱导的血管保护效应涉及肠道微生物群重塑和肠道-免疫系统交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.40
自引率
12.30%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.0 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Pharmacology (BJP) is a biomedical science journal offering comprehensive international coverage of experimental and translational pharmacology. It publishes original research, authoritative reviews, mini reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, databases, letters to the Editor, and commentaries. Review articles, databases, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses are typically commissioned, but unsolicited contributions are also considered, either as standalone papers or part of themed issues. In addition to basic science research, BJP features translational pharmacology research, including proof-of-concept and early mechanistic studies in humans. While it generally does not publish first-in-man phase I studies or phase IIb, III, or IV studies, exceptions may be made under certain circumstances, particularly if results are combined with preclinical studies.
期刊最新文献
Network medicine and systems pharmacology approaches to predicting adverse drug effects Progress on the development of Class A GPCR‐biased ligands Issue Information An adenosinergic positive feedback loop extends pharmacological cardioprotection duration A p75 neurotrophin receptor‐sparing nerve growth factor protects retinal ganglion cells from neurodegeneration by targeting microglia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1