Anti-BCMA CAR-T cell-based therapies and bispecific antibodies in the immunotherapy era: are we ready for this?

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Expert Review of Hematology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1080/17474086.2024.2357274
Massimo Martino, Barbara Gamberi, Elisabetta Antonioli, Sara Aquino, Roberta Della Pepa, Lara Malerba, Silvia Mangiacavalli, Sara Pezzatti, Sara Bringhen, Elena Zamagni
{"title":"Anti-BCMA CAR-T cell-based therapies and bispecific antibodies in the immunotherapy era: are we ready for this?","authors":"Massimo Martino, Barbara Gamberi, Elisabetta Antonioli, Sara Aquino, Roberta Della Pepa, Lara Malerba, Silvia Mangiacavalli, Sara Pezzatti, Sara Bringhen, Elena Zamagni","doi":"10.1080/17474086.2024.2357274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Therapeutic strategies against multiple myeloma (MM) have evolved dramatically in recent decades, with unprecedent results in the treatment landscape, culminating in the recent incorporation of novel agents in the anti-myeloma armamentarium.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>BCMA represents one of the most promising targets in MM and currently available immune approaches, either approved or under active investigation, are clearly showing their greater potential over standard regimens. In this context, immunotherapies based on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T-cells and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have taken center stage, being the ones that are yielding the most promising results in clinical trials. This review focuses on the current landscape of BsAbs and CAR-T, summarizing the latest advances and possible future developments.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>CAR-T and BsAbs anti-BCMA strategies represent breakthrough therapies against MM. However, their inclusion in clinical practice is almost feared, due to the associated limitations, some of which have been addressed here. Meanwhile, all the efforts should be focused on individualizing and choosing the most suitable candidates for each treatment and to understand how to combine, or sequence, these therapies to improve efficacy and minimize toxicity, especially for those patients with limited available treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":12325,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"375-390"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2024.2357274","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Therapeutic strategies against multiple myeloma (MM) have evolved dramatically in recent decades, with unprecedent results in the treatment landscape, culminating in the recent incorporation of novel agents in the anti-myeloma armamentarium.

Areas covered: BCMA represents one of the most promising targets in MM and currently available immune approaches, either approved or under active investigation, are clearly showing their greater potential over standard regimens. In this context, immunotherapies based on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T-cells and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have taken center stage, being the ones that are yielding the most promising results in clinical trials. This review focuses on the current landscape of BsAbs and CAR-T, summarizing the latest advances and possible future developments.

Expert opinion: CAR-T and BsAbs anti-BCMA strategies represent breakthrough therapies against MM. However, their inclusion in clinical practice is almost feared, due to the associated limitations, some of which have been addressed here. Meanwhile, all the efforts should be focused on individualizing and choosing the most suitable candidates for each treatment and to understand how to combine, or sequence, these therapies to improve efficacy and minimize toxicity, especially for those patients with limited available treatment options.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
免疫疗法时代的抗BCMA CAR-T细胞疗法和双特异性抗体:我们准备好了吗?
导言:近几十年来,针对多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的治疗策略发生了巨大的变化,在治疗领域取得了前所未有的成果,并在最近将新型药物纳入抗骨髓瘤药物库中:BCMA是骨髓瘤中最有希望的靶点之一,目前可用的免疫疗法,无论是已获批准的还是正在积极研究的,都清楚地显示出它们比标准疗法更具潜力。在这种情况下,基于嵌合抗原受体(CAR)工程T细胞和双特异性抗体(BsAbs)的免疫疗法占据了中心位置,在临床试验中取得了最有希望的结果。本综述将重点关注BsAbs和CAR-T的现状,总结最新进展和未来可能的发展:CAR-T和BsAbs抗BCMA策略是针对MM的突破性疗法。专家观点:CAR-T 和 BsAbs 抗骨髓增生异常综合征策略是治疗 MM 的突破性疗法,但由于存在相关的局限性,人们几乎不敢将其应用于临床实践。与此同时,所有的努力都应集中在个体化和为每种疗法选择最合适的候选者上,并了解如何将这些疗法结合起来或进行排序,以提高疗效和减少毒性,尤其是对于那些可选治疗方案有限的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advanced molecular research techniques have transformed hematology in recent years. With improved understanding of hematologic diseases, we now have the opportunity to research and evaluate new biological therapies, new drugs and drug combinations, new treatment schedules and novel approaches including stem cell transplantation. We can also expect proteomics, molecular genetics and biomarker research to facilitate new diagnostic approaches and the identification of appropriate therapies. Further advances in our knowledge regarding the formation and function of blood cells and blood-forming tissues should ensue, and it will be a major challenge for hematologists to adopt these new paradigms and develop integrated strategies to define the best possible patient care. Expert Review of Hematology (1747-4086) puts these advances in context and explores how they will translate directly into clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
The impact of oral health promotion on the quality of life of children with bleeding disorders: fighting misconceptions. Rivaroxaban plus aspirin after lower-extremity revascularization. Current and emerging therapies as potential treatment for people with von Willebrand disease. Global prophylaxis trends in hemophilia: a macroeconomic analysis and its association with world development indicators. BCL-2 inhibition in acute myeloid leukemia: resistance and combinations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1