Doppler ultrasound surveillance of recently formed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistula: the SONAR observational cohort study.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health technology assessment Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.3310/YTBT4172
James Richards, Dominic Summers, Anna Sidders, Elisa Allen, Mohammed Ayaz Hossain, Subhankar Paul, Matthew Slater, Matthew Bartlett, Regin Lagaac, Emma Laing, Valerie Hopkins, Chloe Fitzpatrick-Creamer, Cara Hudson, Joseph Parsons, Samuel Turner, Andrew Tambyraja, Subash Somalanka, James Hunter, Sam Dutta, Neil Hoye, Sarah Lawman, Tracey Salter, Mohammed Farid Aslam, Atul Bagul, Rajesh Sivaprakasam, George E Smith, Helen L Thomas, Zia Moinuddin, Simon R Knight, Nicholas Barnett, Reza Motallebzadeh, Gavin J Pettigrew
{"title":"Doppler ultrasound surveillance of recently formed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistula: the SONAR observational cohort study.","authors":"James Richards, Dominic Summers, Anna Sidders, Elisa Allen, Mohammed Ayaz Hossain, Subhankar Paul, Matthew Slater, Matthew Bartlett, Regin Lagaac, Emma Laing, Valerie Hopkins, Chloe Fitzpatrick-Creamer, Cara Hudson, Joseph Parsons, Samuel Turner, Andrew Tambyraja, Subash Somalanka, James Hunter, Sam Dutta, Neil Hoye, Sarah Lawman, Tracey Salter, Mohammed Farid Aslam, Atul Bagul, Rajesh Sivaprakasam, George E Smith, Helen L Thomas, Zia Moinuddin, Simon R Knight, Nicholas Barnett, Reza Motallebzadeh, Gavin J Pettigrew","doi":"10.3310/YTBT4172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arteriovenous fistulas are considered the best option for haemodialysis provision, but as many as 30% fail to mature or suffer early failure.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the feasibility of performing a randomised controlled trial that examines whether, by informing early and effective salvage intervention of fistulas that would otherwise fail, Doppler ultrasound surveillance of developing arteriovenous fistulas improves longer-term arteriovenous fistula patency.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective multicentre observational cohort study (the 'SONAR' study).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Seventeen haemodialysis centres in the UK.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Consenting adults with end-stage renal disease who were scheduled to have an arteriovenous fistula created.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Participants underwent Doppler ultrasound surveillance of their arteriovenous fistulas at 2, 4, 6 and 10 weeks after creation, with clinical teams blinded to the ultrasound surveillance findings.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Fistula maturation at week 10 defined according to ultrasound surveillance parameters of representative venous diameter and blood flow (wrist arteriovenous fistulas: ≥ 4 mm and > 400 ml/minute; elbow arteriovenous fistulas: ≥ 5 mm and > 500 ml/minute). Mixed multivariable logistic regression modelling of the early ultrasound scan data was used to predict arteriovenous fistula non-maturation by 10 weeks and fistula failure at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 333 arteriovenous fistulas were created during the study window (47.7% wrist, 52.3% elbow). By 2 weeks, 37 (11.1%) arteriovenous fistulas had failed (thrombosed), but by 10 weeks, 219 of 333 (65.8%) of created arteriovenous fistulas had reached maturity (60.4% wrist, 67.2% elbow). Persistently lower flow rates and venous diameters were observed in those fistulas that did not mature. Models for arteriovenous fistulas' non-maturation could be optimally constructed using the week 4 scan data, with fistula venous diameter and flow rate the most significant variables in explaining wrist fistula maturity failure (positive predictive value 60.6%, 95% confidence interval 43.9% to 77.3%), whereas resistance index and flow rate were most significant for elbow arteriovenous fistulas (positive predictive value 66.7%, 95% confidence interval 48.9% to 84.4%). In contrast to non-maturation, both models predicted fistula maturation much more reliably [negative predictive values of 95.4% (95% confidence interval 91.0% to 99.8%) and 95.6% (95% confidence interval 91.8% to 99.4%) for wrist and elbow, respectively]. Additional follow-up and modelling on a subset (<i>n</i> = 192) of the original SONAR cohort (the SONAR-12M study) revealed the rates of primary, assisted primary and secondary patency arteriovenous fistulas at 6 months were 76.5, 80.7 and 83.3, respectively. Fistula vein size, flow rate and resistance index could identify primary patency failure at 6 months, with similar predictive power as for 10-week arteriovenous fistula maturity failure, but with wide confidence intervals for wrist (positive predictive value 72.7%, 95% confidence interval 46.4% to 99.0%) and elbow (positive predictive value 57.1%, 95% confidence interval 20.5% to 93.8%). These models, moreover, performed poorly at identifying assisted primary and secondary patency failure, likely because a subset of those arteriovenous fistulas identified on ultrasound surveillance as at risk underwent subsequent successful salvage intervention without recourse to early ultrasound data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although early ultrasound can predict fistula maturation and longer-term patency very effectively, it was only moderately good at identifying those fistulas likely to remain immature or to fail within 6 months. Allied to the better- than-expected fistula patency rates achieved (that are further improved by successful salvage), we estimate that a randomised controlled trial comparing early ultrasound-guided intervention against standard care would require at least 1300 fistulas and would achieve only minimal patient benefit.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial is registered as ISRCTN36033877 and ISRCTN17399438.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR135572) and is published in full in <i>Health Technology Assessment</i>; Vol. 28, No. 24. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.</p>","PeriodicalId":12898,"journal":{"name":"Health technology assessment","volume":"28 24","pages":"1-54"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11145465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health technology assessment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/YTBT4172","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Arteriovenous fistulas are considered the best option for haemodialysis provision, but as many as 30% fail to mature or suffer early failure.

Objective: To assess the feasibility of performing a randomised controlled trial that examines whether, by informing early and effective salvage intervention of fistulas that would otherwise fail, Doppler ultrasound surveillance of developing arteriovenous fistulas improves longer-term arteriovenous fistula patency.

Design: A prospective multicentre observational cohort study (the 'SONAR' study).

Setting: Seventeen haemodialysis centres in the UK.

Participants: Consenting adults with end-stage renal disease who were scheduled to have an arteriovenous fistula created.

Intervention: Participants underwent Doppler ultrasound surveillance of their arteriovenous fistulas at 2, 4, 6 and 10 weeks after creation, with clinical teams blinded to the ultrasound surveillance findings.

Main outcome measures: Fistula maturation at week 10 defined according to ultrasound surveillance parameters of representative venous diameter and blood flow (wrist arteriovenous fistulas: ≥ 4 mm and > 400 ml/minute; elbow arteriovenous fistulas: ≥ 5 mm and > 500 ml/minute). Mixed multivariable logistic regression modelling of the early ultrasound scan data was used to predict arteriovenous fistula non-maturation by 10 weeks and fistula failure at 6 months.

Results: A total of 333 arteriovenous fistulas were created during the study window (47.7% wrist, 52.3% elbow). By 2 weeks, 37 (11.1%) arteriovenous fistulas had failed (thrombosed), but by 10 weeks, 219 of 333 (65.8%) of created arteriovenous fistulas had reached maturity (60.4% wrist, 67.2% elbow). Persistently lower flow rates and venous diameters were observed in those fistulas that did not mature. Models for arteriovenous fistulas' non-maturation could be optimally constructed using the week 4 scan data, with fistula venous diameter and flow rate the most significant variables in explaining wrist fistula maturity failure (positive predictive value 60.6%, 95% confidence interval 43.9% to 77.3%), whereas resistance index and flow rate were most significant for elbow arteriovenous fistulas (positive predictive value 66.7%, 95% confidence interval 48.9% to 84.4%). In contrast to non-maturation, both models predicted fistula maturation much more reliably [negative predictive values of 95.4% (95% confidence interval 91.0% to 99.8%) and 95.6% (95% confidence interval 91.8% to 99.4%) for wrist and elbow, respectively]. Additional follow-up and modelling on a subset (n = 192) of the original SONAR cohort (the SONAR-12M study) revealed the rates of primary, assisted primary and secondary patency arteriovenous fistulas at 6 months were 76.5, 80.7 and 83.3, respectively. Fistula vein size, flow rate and resistance index could identify primary patency failure at 6 months, with similar predictive power as for 10-week arteriovenous fistula maturity failure, but with wide confidence intervals for wrist (positive predictive value 72.7%, 95% confidence interval 46.4% to 99.0%) and elbow (positive predictive value 57.1%, 95% confidence interval 20.5% to 93.8%). These models, moreover, performed poorly at identifying assisted primary and secondary patency failure, likely because a subset of those arteriovenous fistulas identified on ultrasound surveillance as at risk underwent subsequent successful salvage intervention without recourse to early ultrasound data.

Conclusions: Although early ultrasound can predict fistula maturation and longer-term patency very effectively, it was only moderately good at identifying those fistulas likely to remain immature or to fail within 6 months. Allied to the better- than-expected fistula patency rates achieved (that are further improved by successful salvage), we estimate that a randomised controlled trial comparing early ultrasound-guided intervention against standard care would require at least 1300 fistulas and would achieve only minimal patient benefit.

Trial registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN36033877 and ISRCTN17399438.

Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR135572) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 24. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对近期形成的血液透析动静脉瘘进行多普勒超声监测:SONAR 观察性队列研究。
背景:动静脉瘘被认为是提供血液透析的最佳选择,但多达30%的动静脉瘘无法成熟或早期失败:目的:评估进行随机对照试验的可行性,该试验将研究对正在形成的动静脉瘘进行多普勒超声监测是否能通过为早期和有效挽救瘘管提供信息来改善长期动静脉瘘的通畅性:设计:前瞻性多中心观察队列研究("SONAR "研究):地点:英国 17 家血液透析中心:干预措施:干预措施:参与者在动静脉瘘建立后的2、4、6和10周接受多普勒超声监测,临床团队对超声监测结果保密:根据超声监测的代表性静脉直径和血流量参数定义第10周时的瘘管成熟度(腕动静脉瘘:≥4毫米且>400毫升/分钟;肘动静脉瘘:≥5毫米且>500毫升/分钟)。对早期超声扫描数据进行混合多变量逻辑回归建模,以预测动静脉瘘在10周内不成熟和6个月时瘘管失败的情况:在研究窗口期共创建了333个动静脉瘘(47.7%为腕部,52.3%为肘部)。到 2 周时,37 个(11.1%)动静脉瘘失败(血栓形成),但到 10 周时,333 个动静脉瘘中的 219 个(65.8%)已经成熟(腕部 60.4%,肘部 67.2%)。在没有成熟的瘘管中观察到持续较低的流速和静脉直径。利用第 4 周的扫描数据可以构建动静脉瘘未成熟的最佳模型,其中瘘管静脉直径和流速是解释腕部瘘管成熟失败最重要的变量(阳性预测值为 60.6%,95% 置信区间为 43.9% 至 77.3%),而阻力指数和流速对肘部动静脉瘘最重要(阳性预测值为 66.7%,95% 置信区间为 48.9% 至 84.4%)。与不成熟相比,这两种模型预测瘘管成熟的可靠性更高[腕部和肘部的阴性预测值分别为 95.4%(95% 置信区间 91.0% 至 99.8%)和 95.6%(95% 置信区间 91.8% 至 99.4%)]。对原始 SONAR 队列中的一个子集(n = 192)进行的额外随访和建模(SONAR-12M 研究)显示,6 个月时的原发性、辅助性和继发性动静脉瘘通畅率分别为 76.5、80.7 和 83.3。瘘管静脉大小、流速和阻力指数可确定 6 个月时的原发性通畅失败,其预测能力与 10 周动静脉瘘成熟失败相似,但腕部(阳性预测值为 72.7%,95% 置信区间为 46.4% 至 99.0%)和肘部(阳性预测值为 57.1%,95% 置信区间为 20.5% 至 93.8%)的置信区间较宽。此外,这些模型在识别辅助性原发性和继发性通畅失败方面表现不佳,这很可能是因为在超声监测中发现有风险的动静脉瘘中有一部分人随后接受了成功的挽救性干预,而没有求助于早期超声数据:结论:虽然早期超声波能非常有效地预测瘘管的成熟和长期通畅情况,但在识别那些可能在6个月内仍未成熟或通畅失败的瘘管方面,它的效果一般。尽管瘘管的通畅率高于预期(成功的抢救进一步提高了通畅率),但我们估计,将超声引导下的早期干预与标准护理进行比较的随机对照试验至少需要 1300 个瘘管,而且对患者的益处微乎其微:该试验注册为 ISRCTN36033877 和 ISRCTN17399438:该奖项由美国国家健康与护理研究所(NIHR)健康技术评估项目资助(NIHR奖项编号:NIHR135572),全文发表于《健康技术评估》第28卷第24期。如需了解更多奖项信息,请参阅 NIHR Funding and Awards 网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health technology assessment
Health technology assessment 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Technology Assessment (HTA) publishes research information on the effectiveness, costs and broader impact of health technologies for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS.
期刊最新文献
Process evaluation exploring implementation and delivery of a home-based extended exercise intervention for older people with frailty: the HERO trial. Dismantling behavioural weight management interventions: component network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and real-world services. Behavioural weight management interventions for the treatment of obesity: network meta-analysis of trial and real-world individual participant data. Risk assessment tools for predicting transfusion in surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Accuracy and clinical effectiveness of fetal growth monitoring strategies for the prediction of small for gestational age at birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1