Hexagonal Barbell Deadlift One-repetition Maximum Estimation Using Velocity Recordings.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES International journal of sports medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1055/a-2330-3001
Danica Janicijevic, Deniz Senturk, Zeki Akyildiz, Yaodong Gu, Amador García-Ramos
{"title":"Hexagonal Barbell Deadlift One-repetition Maximum Estimation Using Velocity Recordings.","authors":"Danica Janicijevic, Deniz Senturk, Zeki Akyildiz, Yaodong Gu, Amador García-Ramos","doi":"10.1055/a-2330-3001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to determine whether the optimal minimal velocity threshold (MVT) provides more precise estimates of one-repetition maximum (1RM) in the hexagonal barbell deadlift (HBD) than the general and individual MVTs. The 1RMs of 27 resistance-trained males were predicted using three types of MVT: (i) <i>General MVT:</i> averaged across subjects' velocity of the 1RM trial (0.25 m·s<sup>-1</sup>), (ii) <i>individual MVT:</i> velocity attained during the 1RM trial, and (iii) <i>Optimal MVT:</i> MVT that eliminated the differences between the actual and predicted 1RM. Two individual load-velocity relationships were modelled considering five (30-50-70-80%1RM) or six (30-50-70-80-90%1RM) loading conditions. Negligible differences (Effect size<0.20), low absolute errors (<5% of the actual 1RM), and extremely high correlations (<i>r</i>>0.90) were observed between the actual and six predicted 1RMs. The only significant difference was the lower raw errors for the 90%1RM condition (0.60±7.34 kg) compared to the 80%1RM condition (2.27±7.54 kg; <i>p</i>=0.013). These results suggest that the individual load-velocity relationship offers an accurate estimation of the HBD 1RM in resistance-trained males, and these estimates could maintain similar levels of precision across different types of MVT (general, individual, and optimal) and final tested loads (80%1RM and 90%1RM).</p>","PeriodicalId":14439,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports medicine","volume":" ","pages":"844-850"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2330-3001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether the optimal minimal velocity threshold (MVT) provides more precise estimates of one-repetition maximum (1RM) in the hexagonal barbell deadlift (HBD) than the general and individual MVTs. The 1RMs of 27 resistance-trained males were predicted using three types of MVT: (i) General MVT: averaged across subjects' velocity of the 1RM trial (0.25 m·s-1), (ii) individual MVT: velocity attained during the 1RM trial, and (iii) Optimal MVT: MVT that eliminated the differences between the actual and predicted 1RM. Two individual load-velocity relationships were modelled considering five (30-50-70-80%1RM) or six (30-50-70-80-90%1RM) loading conditions. Negligible differences (Effect size<0.20), low absolute errors (<5% of the actual 1RM), and extremely high correlations (r>0.90) were observed between the actual and six predicted 1RMs. The only significant difference was the lower raw errors for the 90%1RM condition (0.60±7.34 kg) compared to the 80%1RM condition (2.27±7.54 kg; p=0.013). These results suggest that the individual load-velocity relationship offers an accurate estimation of the HBD 1RM in resistance-trained males, and these estimates could maintain similar levels of precision across different types of MVT (general, individual, and optimal) and final tested loads (80%1RM and 90%1RM).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用速度记录估算六角杠铃负重举一次重复最大重量。
本研究旨在确定最佳最小速度阈值(MVT)是否能比一般和个别 MVT 更精确地估计六角杠铃举重(HBD)的单次最大重量(1RM)。我们使用三种 MVT 预测了 27 名阻力训练男性的 1RM 值:(i) 一般 MVT:1RM 试验中受试者的平均速度(0.25 m-s-1);(ii) 单个 MVT:1RM 试验中达到的速度;(iii) 最佳 MVT:消除实际和预测 1RM 值之间差异的 MVT。考虑到五种(30-50-70-80%1RM)或六种(30-50-70-80-90%1RM)负荷条件,建立了两种个人负荷-速度关系模型。在实际和六个预测的 1RM 之间观察到了微小的差异(效应大小 < 0.20)、较低的绝对误差(< 实际 1RM 的 5%)和极高的相关性(r > 0.90)。唯一的显著差异是 90%1RM 条件下的原始误差(0.60 ± 7.34 千克)低于 80%1RM 条件下的原始误差(2.27 ± 7.54 千克;p = 0.013)。这些结果表明,个体负荷-速度关系可准确估计阻力训练男性的 HBD 1RM 值,而且这些估计值在不同类型的 MVT(一般、个体和最佳)和最终测试负荷(80%1RM 和 90%1RM)中可保持相似的精度水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The IJSM provides a forum for the publication of papers dealing with both basic and applied information that advance the field of sports medicine and exercise science, and offer a better understanding of biomedicine. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, short communications, and letters to the Editors.
期刊最新文献
Anxiety, pain, and fear of pain: predictors of postural stability after concussion. Comparing unilateral and bilateral assessments of adductor isometric strength symmetry. Epidemiology of causes, and management of severe spinal injuries in elite male wrestlers. Running critical power modeling: insights into physiological and neuromuscular performance. Twelve-week interval training alters cytokines, adipokines and bone markers in women with obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1