Jan Hambrecht, Paul Köhli, Erika Chiapparelli, Krizia Amoroso, Jiaqi Zhu, Ranqing Lan, Ali E Guven, Gisberto Evangelisti, Marco D Burkhard, Koki Tsuchiya, Roland Duculan, Jennifer Shue, Andrew A Sama, Frank P Cammisa, Federico P Girardi, Carol A Mancuso, Alexander P Hughes
{"title":"How Much Improvement in Oswestry Disability Index is Necessary to Make Your Patient Satisfied After Lumbar Surgery?","authors":"Jan Hambrecht, Paul Köhli, Erika Chiapparelli, Krizia Amoroso, Jiaqi Zhu, Ranqing Lan, Ali E Guven, Gisberto Evangelisti, Marco D Burkhard, Koki Tsuchiya, Roland Duculan, Jennifer Shue, Andrew A Sama, Frank P Cammisa, Federico P Girardi, Carol A Mancuso, Alexander P Hughes","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review of cohort studies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To clarify the necessary Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) improvement for patient satisfaction 2 years after lumbar surgery.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluating elective lumbar surgery care often involves patient-reported outcomes. While postoperative functional improvement measured by ODI is theoretically linked to satisfaction, conflicting evidence exists regarding this association.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Baseline ODI and 2-year postoperative ODI were assessed. Patient satisfaction, measured on a scale from 1 to 5, with scores ≥4 considered satisfactory, was evaluated. Patients with incomplete follow-up were excluded. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U and multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined threshold values for ODI improvement and postoperative target ODI indicative of patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 383 patients were included (mean age: 65 ± 10 y, 57% females). ODI improvement was observed in 91% of patients, with 77% reporting satisfaction scores ≥4. Baseline ODI (median: 62, interquartile range: 46-74) improved to a median of 10 (interquartile range: 1-10) 2 years postoperatively. Baseline [odds ratio (OR): 0.98, P = 0.015] and postoperative ODI scores (OR: 0.93, P < 0.001), as well as the difference between them (OR: 1.04, P < 0.001), were significantly associated with patient satisfaction. Improvement of ≥38 ODI points or a relative change of ≥66% was indicative of patient satisfaction, with higher sensitivity (80%) and specificity (82%) for the relative change versus the absolute change (69%, 68%). With a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 77%, a postoperative target ODI of ≤24 indicated patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lower baseline ODI and greater improvements in postoperative ODI are associated with an increased likelihood of patient satisfaction. A relative improvement of ≥66% or achieving a postoperative ODI score of ≤24 were the most indicative thresholds for predicting patient satisfaction, proving more sensitivity and specificity than an absolute change of ≥38 points.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"67-73"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective review of cohort studies.
Objective: To clarify the necessary Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) improvement for patient satisfaction 2 years after lumbar surgery.
Background: Evaluating elective lumbar surgery care often involves patient-reported outcomes. While postoperative functional improvement measured by ODI is theoretically linked to satisfaction, conflicting evidence exists regarding this association.
Material and methods: Baseline ODI and 2-year postoperative ODI were assessed. Patient satisfaction, measured on a scale from 1 to 5, with scores ≥4 considered satisfactory, was evaluated. Patients with incomplete follow-up were excluded. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U and multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined threshold values for ODI improvement and postoperative target ODI indicative of patient satisfaction.
Results: A total of 383 patients were included (mean age: 65 ± 10 y, 57% females). ODI improvement was observed in 91% of patients, with 77% reporting satisfaction scores ≥4. Baseline ODI (median: 62, interquartile range: 46-74) improved to a median of 10 (interquartile range: 1-10) 2 years postoperatively. Baseline [odds ratio (OR): 0.98, P = 0.015] and postoperative ODI scores (OR: 0.93, P < 0.001), as well as the difference between them (OR: 1.04, P < 0.001), were significantly associated with patient satisfaction. Improvement of ≥38 ODI points or a relative change of ≥66% was indicative of patient satisfaction, with higher sensitivity (80%) and specificity (82%) for the relative change versus the absolute change (69%, 68%). With a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 77%, a postoperative target ODI of ≤24 indicated patient satisfaction.
Conclusion: Lower baseline ODI and greater improvements in postoperative ODI are associated with an increased likelihood of patient satisfaction. A relative improvement of ≥66% or achieving a postoperative ODI score of ≤24 were the most indicative thresholds for predicting patient satisfaction, proving more sensitivity and specificity than an absolute change of ≥38 points.
研究设计回顾性队列研究:明确腰椎手术两年后患者满意度所需的 ODI 改善:背景:评估择期腰椎手术护理通常涉及患者报告结果(PRO)。虽然理论上以 ODI 衡量的术后功能改善与满意度有关,但关于这种关联存在相互矛盾的证据:方法:对基线 ODI 和术后 2 年 ODI 进行评估。对患者满意度进行评估,满意度从1到5分进行测量,得分≥4分为满意。未完成随访的患者被排除在外。统计分析包括 Mann-Whitney-U 和多变量逻辑回归,并对年龄、性别和体重指数进行了调整。接收者操作特征(ROC)分析确定了患者满意度的 ODI 改善阈值和术后目标 ODI:共纳入 383 名患者(平均年龄为 65±10 岁,57% 为女性)。91%的患者ODI有所改善,77%的患者满意度评分≥4分。术后 2 年,基线 ODI(中位数 62,IQR 46-74)改善至中位数 10(IQR 1-10)。基线 ODI 评分(OR 0.98,P=0.015)和术后 ODI 评分(OR 0.93,P=0.015)均有改善:较低的基线 ODI 和较大的术后 ODI 改善与患者满意度增加的可能性相关。相对改善率≥66%或术后ODI评分≤24分是预测患者满意度的最具指示性的阈值,比绝对值变化≥38分更具敏感性和特异性。
期刊介绍:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store.
Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.