Radiotherapy resources in the Philippines: A 2022 update

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Cancer Policy Pub Date : 2024-05-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100485
Johanna Patricia A. Canal , Michelle Ann B. Eala , Ma. Veronica Pia N. Arevalo , Edward Christopher Dee , Henri Cartier S. Co
{"title":"Radiotherapy resources in the Philippines: A 2022 update","authors":"Johanna Patricia A. Canal ,&nbsp;Michelle Ann B. Eala ,&nbsp;Ma. Veronica Pia N. Arevalo ,&nbsp;Edward Christopher Dee ,&nbsp;Henri Cartier S. Co","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cancer is the third leading cause of death in the Philippines. Radiotherapy (RT) is integral to the treatment and palliation of cancer. Therefore, RT resources across the country must be surveyed and optimized.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Online surveys were sent to the heads of all 50 RT facilities in the Philippines. The survey included items regarding the facility itself, personnel, and available services.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>The survey had a 98% response rate. 76% of RT facilities in the Philippines are privately owned; 12 are government/public institutions and 8 are academic centers. Over a third are in the National Capital Region; three regions are without a single RT facility. For a population of &gt;110 million, the Philippines has 53 linear accelerators, 125 radiation oncologists, 56 residents, 114 medical physicists, 113 radiation oncology nurses, and 343 radiation therapists. Nine radiation oncology residency programs are active. All facilities are capable of 3D conformal radiotherapy, and 96% are capable of intensity modulated radiotherapy. &lt;30% offer stereotactic radiotherapy, and &lt;50% offer HDR brachytherapy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>While there has been significant expansion of RT resources over the years, RT remains inaccessible for many in the Philippines. Urgent investment in training and retaining RT personnel is needed as well. Policy summary: With its current cancer burden, the Philippines needs at least 170 linear accelerators, 300 radiation oncologists, and 150 medical physicists. Public/government cancer centers must be built, with priority given to regions without RT facilities. HDR brachytherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy services must also be expanded. A national RT task force must be created to ensure the quality, availability, and accessibility of RT in the Philippines. Further work exploring payment schemes that improve access to RT and mitigate financial toxicity is needed, as well as integration of radiation oncology providers and health policy experts into national health system decision making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100485"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538324000195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cancer is the third leading cause of death in the Philippines. Radiotherapy (RT) is integral to the treatment and palliation of cancer. Therefore, RT resources across the country must be surveyed and optimized.

Methods

Online surveys were sent to the heads of all 50 RT facilities in the Philippines. The survey included items regarding the facility itself, personnel, and available services.

Findings

The survey had a 98% response rate. 76% of RT facilities in the Philippines are privately owned; 12 are government/public institutions and 8 are academic centers. Over a third are in the National Capital Region; three regions are without a single RT facility. For a population of >110 million, the Philippines has 53 linear accelerators, 125 radiation oncologists, 56 residents, 114 medical physicists, 113 radiation oncology nurses, and 343 radiation therapists. Nine radiation oncology residency programs are active. All facilities are capable of 3D conformal radiotherapy, and 96% are capable of intensity modulated radiotherapy. <30% offer stereotactic radiotherapy, and <50% offer HDR brachytherapy.

Conclusion

While there has been significant expansion of RT resources over the years, RT remains inaccessible for many in the Philippines. Urgent investment in training and retaining RT personnel is needed as well. Policy summary: With its current cancer burden, the Philippines needs at least 170 linear accelerators, 300 radiation oncologists, and 150 medical physicists. Public/government cancer centers must be built, with priority given to regions without RT facilities. HDR brachytherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy services must also be expanded. A national RT task force must be created to ensure the quality, availability, and accessibility of RT in the Philippines. Further work exploring payment schemes that improve access to RT and mitigate financial toxicity is needed, as well as integration of radiation oncology providers and health policy experts into national health system decision making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
菲律宾的放射治疗资源:2022 年更新。
背景:癌症是菲律宾人的第三大死因。放射治疗(RT)是治疗和缓解癌症不可或缺的手段。因此,必须对全国的 RT 资源进行调查和优化:向菲律宾所有 50 家放射治疗机构的负责人发送了在线调查问卷。调查内容包括设施本身、人员和可用服务等项目:调查的回复率为 98%。菲律宾 76% 的 RT 设施为私人所有;12 家为政府/公共机构,8 家为学术中心。超过三分之一的设施位于国家首都地区;有三个地区没有一家 RT 设施。菲律宾人口超过 1.1 亿,拥有 53 台直线加速器、125 名放射肿瘤学家、56 名住院医师、114 名医学物理学家、113 名放射肿瘤学护士和 343 名放射治疗师。目前有 9 个放射肿瘤住院医师培训项目。所有设施都能进行三维适形放射治疗,96% 的设施能进行调强放射治疗。结论:尽管多年来菲律宾的放射治疗资源得到了大幅扩充,但许多菲律宾人仍然无法获得放射治疗服务。此外,还需要在培训和留住 RT 人员方面进行紧急投资。政策摘要:以目前的癌症负担,菲律宾至少需要 170 台直线加速器、300 名放射肿瘤学家和 150 名医学物理学家。必须建立公共/政府癌症中心,优先考虑没有 RT 设施的地区。还必须扩大 HDR 近距离放射治疗和立体定向放射治疗服务。必须成立国家 RT 工作组,以确保菲律宾 RT 的质量、可用性和可及性。还需要进一步开展工作,探索可改善 RT 可及性和减轻经济毒性的支付方案,并将放射肿瘤服务提供者和卫生政策专家纳入国家卫生系统的决策中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Policy
Journal of Cancer Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
65 days
期刊最新文献
Changes in employment status and income and workplace organizational support among cancer survivors: A descriptive study in Iran. Process evaluation of quality of precancerous cervical lesion screening program in selected public health centers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Beyond smoke: Status of flavored smokeless tobacco regulation in India. Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Cancer Treatment Referrals in Patients Living with HIV in the United States: A Narrative Review. Sexual health in women and sexual-gender-minority patients with cancer: A nationwide survey on healthcare professional awareness and attitude on behalf of MITO and AIRO-gynecology group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1