Identifying predictors of adverse outcomes after termination of seclusion in psychiatric intensive care units.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY BJPsych Open Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1192/bjo.2024.710
Jonathan P Rogers, Gabriella Lewis, Maria Lobo, Clementine Wyke, Alexander Meaburn, Fiona Harding, Rebecca Garvey, Jenny Irvine, Ahmed Saeed Yahya, Daisy Kornblum, Alexis E Cullen, David Mirfin, Glyn Lewis
{"title":"Identifying predictors of adverse outcomes after termination of seclusion in psychiatric intensive care units.","authors":"Jonathan P Rogers, Gabriella Lewis, Maria Lobo, Clementine Wyke, Alexander Meaburn, Fiona Harding, Rebecca Garvey, Jenny Irvine, Ahmed Saeed Yahya, Daisy Kornblum, Alexis E Cullen, David Mirfin, Glyn Lewis","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Seclusion is a restrictive practice that many healthcare services are trying to reduce. Previous studies have sought to identify predictors of seclusion initiation, but few have investigated factors associated with adverse outcomes after seclusion termination.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the factors that predict an adverse outcome within 24 h of seclusion termination.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In a cohort study of individuals secluded in psychiatric intensive care units, we investigated factors associated with any of the following outcomes: actual violence, attempted violence, or reinitiation of seclusion within 24 h of seclusion termination. Among the seclusion episodes that were initiated between 29 March 2018 and 4 March 2019, we investigated the exposures of medication cooperation, seclusion duration, termination out of working hours, involvement of medical staff in the final seclusion review, lack of insight, and agitation or irritability. In a mixed-effects logistic regression model, associations between each exposure and the outcome were calculated. Odds ratios were calculated unadjusted and adjusted for demographic and clinical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 254 seclusion episodes from 122 individuals (40 female, 82 male), of which 106 (41.7%) had an adverse outcome within 24 h of seclusion termination. Agitation or irritability was associated with an adverse outcome, odds ratio 1.92 (95% CI 1.03 to 3.56, <i>P</i> = 0.04), but there was no statistically significant association with any of the other exposures, although confidence intervals were broad.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Agitation or irritability in the hours preceding termination of seclusion may predict an adverse outcome. The study was not powered to detect other potentially clinically significant factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"10 3","pages":"e120"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.710","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Seclusion is a restrictive practice that many healthcare services are trying to reduce. Previous studies have sought to identify predictors of seclusion initiation, but few have investigated factors associated with adverse outcomes after seclusion termination.

Aims: To assess the factors that predict an adverse outcome within 24 h of seclusion termination.

Method: In a cohort study of individuals secluded in psychiatric intensive care units, we investigated factors associated with any of the following outcomes: actual violence, attempted violence, or reinitiation of seclusion within 24 h of seclusion termination. Among the seclusion episodes that were initiated between 29 March 2018 and 4 March 2019, we investigated the exposures of medication cooperation, seclusion duration, termination out of working hours, involvement of medical staff in the final seclusion review, lack of insight, and agitation or irritability. In a mixed-effects logistic regression model, associations between each exposure and the outcome were calculated. Odds ratios were calculated unadjusted and adjusted for demographic and clinical variables.

Results: We identified 254 seclusion episodes from 122 individuals (40 female, 82 male), of which 106 (41.7%) had an adverse outcome within 24 h of seclusion termination. Agitation or irritability was associated with an adverse outcome, odds ratio 1.92 (95% CI 1.03 to 3.56, P = 0.04), but there was no statistically significant association with any of the other exposures, although confidence intervals were broad.

Conclusions: Agitation or irritability in the hours preceding termination of seclusion may predict an adverse outcome. The study was not powered to detect other potentially clinically significant factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定精神科重症监护病房终止隔离后不良后果的预测因素。
背景:隔离是一种限制性做法,许多医疗服务机构都在努力减少这种做法。以前的研究试图确定开始隔离的预测因素,但很少有研究调查与隔离终止后的不良后果相关的因素。目的:评估预测隔离终止后 24 小时内不良后果的因素:在一项针对精神科重症监护病房隔离患者的队列研究中,我们调查了与以下任何一种结果相关的因素:实际暴力、暴力未遂或在隔离终止后 24 小时内重新实施隔离。在 2018 年 3 月 29 日至 2019 年 3 月 4 日期间启动的隔离事件中,我们调查了用药合作、隔离持续时间、工作时间以外终止隔离、医务人员参与最终隔离审查、缺乏洞察力以及激动或易怒等暴露因素。在混合效应逻辑回归模型中,计算了每种暴露与结果之间的关联。计算了未调整和根据人口统计学和临床变量调整的比值比:我们确定了 122 名患者(40 名女性,82 名男性)的 254 次隔离事件,其中 106 人(41.7%)在隔离终止后 24 小时内出现不良后果。躁动或易怒与不良后果相关,几率比为 1.92(95% CI 1.03 至 3.56,P = 0.04),但与任何其他暴露均无统计学意义上的显著关联,尽管置信区间较宽:结论:隔离终止前数小时内的躁动或易怒可能预示着不良后果。该研究没有检测到其他具有潜在临床意义的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
期刊最新文献
Comparing measurements of lithium treatment efficacy in people with bipolar disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis - CORRIGENDUM. Factors associated with mental health outcomes in a Muslim community following the Christchurch terrorist attack. Breaking barriers in the career development of women in academic psychiatry. Cognitive, adaptive and daily life functioning in adults with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Depression in childhood to early adulthood and respiratory health in early adulthood.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1