Prospective, randomized, controlled trial assessing the effects of a driving pressure-limiting strategy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to community-acquired pneumonia (STAMINA trial): protocol and statistical analysis plan.

Critical care science Pub Date : 2024-05-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62675/2965-2774.20240210-en
Israel Silva Maia, Fernando Azevedo Medrado, Lucas Tramujas, Bruno Martins Tomazini, Júlia Souza Oliveira, Erica Regina Ribeiro Sady, Letícia Galvão Barbante, Marina Lazzari Nicola, Rodrigo Magalhães Gurgel, Lucas Petri Damiani, Karina Leal Negrelli, Tamiris Abait Miranda, Eliana Santucci, Nanci Valeis, Ligia Nasi Laranjeira, Glauco Adrieno Westphal, Ruthy Perotto Fernandes, Cássio Luis Zandonai, Mariangela Pimentel Pincelli, Rodrigo Cruvinel Figueiredo, Cíntia Loss Sartori Bustamante, Luiz Fernando Norbin, Emerson Boschi, Rafael Lessa, Marcelo Pereira Romano, Mieko Cláudia Miura, Meton Soares de Alencar Filho, Vicente Cés de Souza Dantas, Priscilla Alves Barreto, Mauro Esteves Hernandes, Cintia Magalhães Carvalho Grion, Alexandre Sanches Laranjeira, Ana Luiza Mezzaroba, Marina Bahl, Ana Carolina Starke, Rodrigo Santos Biondi, Felipe Dal-Pizzol, Eliana Bernadete Caser, Marlus Muri Thompson, Andrea Allegrini Padial, Viviane Cordeiro Veiga, Rodrigo Thot Leite, Gustavo Araújo, Mário Guimarães, Priscilla de Aquino Martins, Fábio Holanda Lacerda, Conrado Roberto Hoffmann Filho, Livia Melro, Eduardo Pacheco, Gustavo Adolfo Ospina-Táscon, Juliana Carvalho Ferreira, Fabricio Jocundo Calado Freires, Flávia Ribeiro Machado, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Fernando Godinho Zampieri
{"title":"Prospective, randomized, controlled trial assessing the effects of a driving pressure-limiting strategy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to community-acquired pneumonia (STAMINA trial): protocol and statistical analysis plan.","authors":"Israel Silva Maia, Fernando Azevedo Medrado, Lucas Tramujas, Bruno Martins Tomazini, Júlia Souza Oliveira, Erica Regina Ribeiro Sady, Letícia Galvão Barbante, Marina Lazzari Nicola, Rodrigo Magalhães Gurgel, Lucas Petri Damiani, Karina Leal Negrelli, Tamiris Abait Miranda, Eliana Santucci, Nanci Valeis, Ligia Nasi Laranjeira, Glauco Adrieno Westphal, Ruthy Perotto Fernandes, Cássio Luis Zandonai, Mariangela Pimentel Pincelli, Rodrigo Cruvinel Figueiredo, Cíntia Loss Sartori Bustamante, Luiz Fernando Norbin, Emerson Boschi, Rafael Lessa, Marcelo Pereira Romano, Mieko Cláudia Miura, Meton Soares de Alencar Filho, Vicente Cés de Souza Dantas, Priscilla Alves Barreto, Mauro Esteves Hernandes, Cintia Magalhães Carvalho Grion, Alexandre Sanches Laranjeira, Ana Luiza Mezzaroba, Marina Bahl, Ana Carolina Starke, Rodrigo Santos Biondi, Felipe Dal-Pizzol, Eliana Bernadete Caser, Marlus Muri Thompson, Andrea Allegrini Padial, Viviane Cordeiro Veiga, Rodrigo Thot Leite, Gustavo Araújo, Mário Guimarães, Priscilla de Aquino Martins, Fábio Holanda Lacerda, Conrado Roberto Hoffmann Filho, Livia Melro, Eduardo Pacheco, Gustavo Adolfo Ospina-Táscon, Juliana Carvalho Ferreira, Fabricio Jocundo Calado Freires, Flávia Ribeiro Machado, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Fernando Godinho Zampieri","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240210-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Driving pressure has been suggested to be the main driver of ventilator-induced lung injury and mortality in observational studies of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Whether a driving pressure-limiting strategy can improve clinical outcomes is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the protocol and statistical analysis plan that will be used to test whether a driving pressure-limiting strategy including positive end-expiratory pressure titration according to the best respiratory compliance and reduction in tidal volume is superior to a standard strategy involving the use of the ARDSNet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table in terms of increasing the number of ventilator-free days in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to community-acquired pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ventilator STrAtegy for coMmunIty acquired pNeumoniA (STAMINA) study is a randomized, multicenter, open-label trial that compares a driving pressure-limiting strategy to the ARDSnet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to community-acquired pneumonia admitted to intensive care units. We expect to recruit 500 patients from 20 Brazilian and 2 Colombian intensive care units. They will be randomized to a driving pressure-limiting strategy group or to a standard strategy using the ARDSNet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table. In the driving pressure-limiting strategy group, positive end-expiratory pressure will be titrated according to the best respiratory system compliance.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>The primary outcome is the number of ventilator-free days within 28 days. The secondary outcomes are in-hospital and intensive care unit mortality and the need for rescue therapies such as extracorporeal life support, recruitment maneuvers and inhaled nitric oxide.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>STAMINA is designed to provide evidence on whether a driving pressure-limiting strategy is superior to the ARDSNet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table strategy for increasing the number of ventilator-free days within 28 days in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Here, we describe the rationale, design and status of the trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11098077/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20240210-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Driving pressure has been suggested to be the main driver of ventilator-induced lung injury and mortality in observational studies of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Whether a driving pressure-limiting strategy can improve clinical outcomes is unclear.

Objective: To describe the protocol and statistical analysis plan that will be used to test whether a driving pressure-limiting strategy including positive end-expiratory pressure titration according to the best respiratory compliance and reduction in tidal volume is superior to a standard strategy involving the use of the ARDSNet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table in terms of increasing the number of ventilator-free days in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to community-acquired pneumonia.

Methods: The ventilator STrAtegy for coMmunIty acquired pNeumoniA (STAMINA) study is a randomized, multicenter, open-label trial that compares a driving pressure-limiting strategy to the ARDSnet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to community-acquired pneumonia admitted to intensive care units. We expect to recruit 500 patients from 20 Brazilian and 2 Colombian intensive care units. They will be randomized to a driving pressure-limiting strategy group or to a standard strategy using the ARDSNet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table. In the driving pressure-limiting strategy group, positive end-expiratory pressure will be titrated according to the best respiratory system compliance.

Outcomes: The primary outcome is the number of ventilator-free days within 28 days. The secondary outcomes are in-hospital and intensive care unit mortality and the need for rescue therapies such as extracorporeal life support, recruitment maneuvers and inhaled nitric oxide.

Conclusion: STAMINA is designed to provide evidence on whether a driving pressure-limiting strategy is superior to the ARDSNet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table strategy for increasing the number of ventilator-free days within 28 days in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Here, we describe the rationale, design and status of the trial.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估社区获得性肺炎急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者驾驶压力限制策略效果的前瞻性随机对照试验(STAMINA 试验):方案和统计分析计划。
背景:在急性呼吸窘迫综合征的观察性研究中,驱动压力被认为是呼吸机诱发肺损伤和死亡的主要驱动因素。目前尚不清楚限制驱动压力的策略能否改善临床结果:目的:描述将用于测试包括根据最佳呼吸顺应性滴定呼气末正压和减少潮气量在内的驱动压力限制策略是否优于使用 ARDSNet 低呼气末正压表的标准策略,以增加社区获得性肺炎导致的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者无呼吸机天数的方案和统计分析计划:针对社区获得性肺炎的呼吸机限制策略(STAMINA)研究是一项随机、多中心、开放标签试验,该试验在重症监护病房收治的社区获得性肺炎导致的中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中比较了驾驶压力限制策略和 ARDSnet 低正压呼气末压力表。我们预计从 20 家巴西重症监护病房和 2 家哥伦比亚重症监护病房招募 500 名患者。他们将被随机分配到驱动压力限制策略组或使用 ARDSNet 低正压呼气末压力表的标准策略组。在驱动压力限制策略组中,呼气末正压将根据最佳呼吸系统顺应性进行调整:主要结果是 28 天内无呼吸机天数。次要结果为院内和重症监护室死亡率,以及对体外生命支持、招募操作和吸入一氧化氮等抢救疗法的需求:STAMINA旨在提供证据,证明在增加中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者28天内无呼吸机天数方面,驱动压力限制策略是否优于ARDSNet低正压呼气末压力表策略。在此,我们将介绍该试验的原理、设计和现状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association between hair cortisol concentration and acute stress symptoms in family members of critically ill patients: a cross-sectional study. Reply to: Factors associated with mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome due to COVID-19 evolution. Advancing insights in critical COVID-19: unraveling lymphopenia through propensity score matching - Findings from the Multicenter LYMPH-COVID Study. Daily Chlorhexidine Bath for Health Care Associated Infection Prevention (CLEAN-IT): protocol for a multicenter cluster randomized crossover open-label trial. Reply to: Neurocritical care management supported by multimodal brain monitoring after acute brain injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1