Conventional clinical signs and symptoms are poor predictors of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak: A single-centre cohort perspective

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Clinical Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1111/coa.14179
Jonathan C. Pang, Leo L. T. Meller, Cecilia H. Nguyen, Arash Abiri, Dean D. Chung, Theodore V. Nguyen, Benjamin F. Bitner, Frank P. K. Hsu, Edward C. Kuan
{"title":"Conventional clinical signs and symptoms are poor predictors of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak: A single-centre cohort perspective","authors":"Jonathan C. Pang,&nbsp;Leo L. T. Meller,&nbsp;Cecilia H. Nguyen,&nbsp;Arash Abiri,&nbsp;Dean D. Chung,&nbsp;Theodore V. Nguyen,&nbsp;Benjamin F. Bitner,&nbsp;Frank P. K. Hsu,&nbsp;Edward C. Kuan","doi":"10.1111/coa.14179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak remains a concerning complication of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for skull base pathology. Signs and symptoms suggesting CSF leak often trigger additional workup during the postoperative course. We systematically evaluate associations between subjectively reported clinical signs/symptoms noted during the immediate postoperative period and incidence of postoperative CSF leaks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective chart review was conducted at a tertiary academic medical centre including 137 consecutive patients with intraoperative CSF leak during EEA with primary repair between July 2018 and August 2022. Postoperative CSF leak associations with clinical signs and symptoms were evaluated using positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), sensitivity, specificity and odds ratio (OR) via univariate logistic regression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seventy-nine patients (57.7%) had high-flow leaks repaired and 5 (3.6%) developed CSF leaks postoperatively. Of reported symptoms, rhinorrhea was most common (<i>n</i> = 52, 38.0%; PPV [95% CI] = 7.6% [4.8%, 11.9%]), followed by severe headache (<i>n</i> = 47, 34.3%; 6.3% [3.1%, 12.5%]), dizziness (<i>n</i> = 43, 31.4%; 2.3% [0.4%, 12.1%]), salty or metallic taste (<i>n</i> = 20, 14.6%; 9.9% [3.3%, 25.8%]), and throat drainage (<i>n</i> = 10, 7.3%; 9.9% [1.7%, 41.4%]). Nausea or vomiting constituted the most reported sign concerning for CSF leak (<i>n</i> = 73, 53.3%; PPV [95% CI] = 4.1% [2.0%, 8.1%]). On univariate regression, no sign or symptom, including rhinorrhea (OR [95% CI] = 7.00 [0.76–64.44]), throat drainage (3.42 [0.35–33.86]), salty/metallic taste (4.22 [0.66–27.04]), severe headache (3.00 [0.48–18.62]), dizziness (0.54 [0.06–4.94]), fever (3.16 [0.50–19.99]), and nausea/vomiting (1.33 [0.22–8.21]), associated with postoperative CSF leak.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>A range of subjectively reported symptoms and signs failed to predict postoperative CSF leak. Further investigation is warranted to inform appropriate attention and response.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10431,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Otolaryngology","volume":"49 5","pages":"621-632"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coa.14179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak remains a concerning complication of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for skull base pathology. Signs and symptoms suggesting CSF leak often trigger additional workup during the postoperative course. We systematically evaluate associations between subjectively reported clinical signs/symptoms noted during the immediate postoperative period and incidence of postoperative CSF leaks.

Methods

Retrospective chart review was conducted at a tertiary academic medical centre including 137 consecutive patients with intraoperative CSF leak during EEA with primary repair between July 2018 and August 2022. Postoperative CSF leak associations with clinical signs and symptoms were evaluated using positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), sensitivity, specificity and odds ratio (OR) via univariate logistic regression.

Results

Seventy-nine patients (57.7%) had high-flow leaks repaired and 5 (3.6%) developed CSF leaks postoperatively. Of reported symptoms, rhinorrhea was most common (n = 52, 38.0%; PPV [95% CI] = 7.6% [4.8%, 11.9%]), followed by severe headache (n = 47, 34.3%; 6.3% [3.1%, 12.5%]), dizziness (n = 43, 31.4%; 2.3% [0.4%, 12.1%]), salty or metallic taste (n = 20, 14.6%; 9.9% [3.3%, 25.8%]), and throat drainage (n = 10, 7.3%; 9.9% [1.7%, 41.4%]). Nausea or vomiting constituted the most reported sign concerning for CSF leak (n = 73, 53.3%; PPV [95% CI] = 4.1% [2.0%, 8.1%]). On univariate regression, no sign or symptom, including rhinorrhea (OR [95% CI] = 7.00 [0.76–64.44]), throat drainage (3.42 [0.35–33.86]), salty/metallic taste (4.22 [0.66–27.04]), severe headache (3.00 [0.48–18.62]), dizziness (0.54 [0.06–4.94]), fever (3.16 [0.50–19.99]), and nausea/vomiting (1.33 [0.22–8.21]), associated with postoperative CSF leak.

Conclusions

A range of subjectively reported symptoms and signs failed to predict postoperative CSF leak. Further investigation is warranted to inform appropriate attention and response.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统的临床症状和体征无法预测术后脑脊液漏:单中心队列视角。
背景:术后脑脊液(CSF)漏仍然是内窥镜鼻内入路(EEA)治疗颅底病变的一个令人担忧的并发症。提示 CSF 漏的体征和症状往往会在术后引发额外的检查。我们系统地评估了术后初期主观报告的临床体征/症状与术后脑脊液漏发生率之间的关系:2018年7月至2022年8月期间,我们在一家三级学术医疗中心进行了回顾性病历审查,包括137例EEA术中CSF漏的连续患者。通过单变量逻辑回归,使用阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)、敏感性、特异性和几率比(OR)评估术后 CSF 漏与临床体征和症状的关联:79名患者(57.7%)修复了高流量渗漏,5名患者(3.6%)术后出现脑脊液渗漏。在报告的症状中,鼻出血最常见(n = 52,38.0%;PPV [95% CI] = 7.6% [4.8%, 11.9%]),其次是严重头痛(n = 47,34.3%;6.3% [3.1%, 12.5%])、头晕(43 人,占 31.4%;2.3% [0.4%,12.1%])、咸味或金属味(20 人,占 14.6%;9.9% [3.3%,25.8%])和喉咙分泌物(10 人,占 7.3%;9.9% [1.7%,41.4%])。恶心或呕吐是报告最多的有关 CSF 泄漏的体征(n = 73,53.3%;PPV [95% CI] = 4.1% [2.0%,8.1%])。在单变量回归中,没有任何体征或症状,包括鼻出血(OR [95% CI] = 7.00 [0.76-64.44])、咽喉流脓(3.42 [0.35-33.86])、咸味/金属味(4.22 [0.66-27.04])、剧烈头痛(3.00 [0.48-18.62])、头晕(0.54 [0.06-4.94])、发热(3.16 [0.50-19.99])和恶心/呕吐(1.33 [0.22-8.21]):结论:一系列主观报告的症状和体征无法预测术后 CSF 漏。结论:一系列主观报告的症状和体征并不能预测术后 CSF 渗漏,因此有必要进行进一步调查,以提供适当的注意事项和应对措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Otolaryngology
Clinical Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
106
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Otolaryngology is a bimonthly journal devoted to clinically-oriented research papers of the highest scientific standards dealing with: current otorhinolaryngological practice audiology, otology, balance, rhinology, larynx, voice and paediatric ORL head and neck oncology head and neck plastic and reconstructive surgery continuing medical education and ORL training The emphasis is on high quality new work in the clinical field and on fresh, original research. Each issue begins with an editorial expressing the personal opinions of an individual with a particular knowledge of a chosen subject. The main body of each issue is then devoted to original papers carrying important results for those working in the field. In addition, topical review articles are published discussing a particular subject in depth, including not only the opinions of the author but also any controversies surrounding the subject. • Negative/null results In order for research to advance, negative results, which often make a valuable contribution to the field, should be published. However, articles containing negative or null results are frequently not considered for publication or rejected by journals. We welcome papers of this kind, where appropriate and valid power calculations are included that give confidence that a negative result can be relied upon.
期刊最新文献
Should Diagnostic Rigid Oesophagoscopy Continue to Form Part of Panendoscopy? Risk Stratification of Suspected Head and Neck Cancer Referral Letters: A Prospective Cohort Study. The Effect of Using Perioperative Platelet-Rich Plasma on Wound Healing Rate and Prevention of Salivary Fistula Formation in Patients Undergoing Partial Parotidectomy. 'How Long Do I Have?' - Examining survival outcomes in laryngeal cancer patients managed with non-curative intent in Northern UK: Insights from the Northern Head & Neck Cancer Alliance Retrospective Study. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1