Microheterogeneity in the Kinetics and Sex-Specific Response to Type I IFN.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Journal of immunology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.4049/jimmunol.2300453
Shani T Gal-Oz, Alev Baysoy, Brinda Vijaykumar, Sara Mostafavi, Christophe Benoist, Tal Shay
{"title":"Microheterogeneity in the Kinetics and Sex-Specific Response to Type I IFN.","authors":"Shani T Gal-Oz, Alev Baysoy, Brinda Vijaykumar, Sara Mostafavi, Christophe Benoist, Tal Shay","doi":"10.4049/jimmunol.2300453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The response to type I IFNs involves the rapid induction of prototypical IFN signature genes (ISGs). It is not known whether the tightly controlled ISG expression observed at the cell population level correctly represents the coherent responses of individual cells or whether it masks some heterogeneity in gene modules and/or responding cells. We performed a time-resolved single-cell analysis of the first 3 h after in vivo IFN stimulation in macrophages and CD4+ T and B lymphocytes from mice. All ISGs were generally induced in concert, with no clear cluster of faster- or slower-responding ISGs. Response kinetics differed between cell types: mostly homogeneous for macrophages, but with far more kinetic diversity among B and T lymphocytes, which included a distinct subset of nonresponsive cells. Velocity analysis confirmed the differences between macrophages in which the response progressed throughout the full 3 h, versus B and T lymphocytes in which it was rapidly curtailed by negative feedback and revealed differences in transcription rates between the lineages. In all cell types, female cells responded faster than their male counterparts. The ISG response thus seems to proceed as a homogeneous gene block, but with kinetics that vary between immune cell types and with sex differences that might underlie differential outcomes of viral infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":16045,"journal":{"name":"Journal of immunology","volume":" ","pages":"96-104"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11328978/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.2300453","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The response to type I IFNs involves the rapid induction of prototypical IFN signature genes (ISGs). It is not known whether the tightly controlled ISG expression observed at the cell population level correctly represents the coherent responses of individual cells or whether it masks some heterogeneity in gene modules and/or responding cells. We performed a time-resolved single-cell analysis of the first 3 h after in vivo IFN stimulation in macrophages and CD4+ T and B lymphocytes from mice. All ISGs were generally induced in concert, with no clear cluster of faster- or slower-responding ISGs. Response kinetics differed between cell types: mostly homogeneous for macrophages, but with far more kinetic diversity among B and T lymphocytes, which included a distinct subset of nonresponsive cells. Velocity analysis confirmed the differences between macrophages in which the response progressed throughout the full 3 h, versus B and T lymphocytes in which it was rapidly curtailed by negative feedback and revealed differences in transcription rates between the lineages. In all cell types, female cells responded faster than their male counterparts. The ISG response thus seems to proceed as a homogeneous gene block, but with kinetics that vary between immune cell types and with sex differences that might underlie differential outcomes of viral infections.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
I 型 IFN 动力学和性别特异性反应的微异质性
对 I 型 IFNs 的反应包括快速诱导原型 IFN 特征基因(ISGs)。目前还不清楚在细胞群水平观察到的严格控制的 ISG 表达是否正确地代表了单个细胞的一致反应,或者是否掩盖了基因模块和/或反应细胞中的某些异质性。我们对小鼠的巨噬细胞、CD4+ T 淋巴细胞和 B 淋巴细胞受到体内 IFN 刺激后的前 3 小时进行了时间分辨单细胞分析。所有 ISG 一般都是协同诱导的,没有明显的反应较快或较慢的 ISG 群。不同类型细胞的反应动力学各不相同:巨噬细胞的反应动力学基本相同,但 B 淋巴细胞和 T 淋巴细胞的反应动力学多样性要大得多,其中包括一个独特的无反应细胞子集。速度分析证实了巨噬细胞与 B 和 T 淋巴细胞之间的差异,巨噬细胞的反应在整个 3 小时内持续进行,而 B 和 T 淋巴细胞的反应则因负反馈而迅速减弱。在所有细胞类型中,雌性细胞的反应速度都快于雄性细胞。因此,ISG 反应似乎是作为同质基因块进行的,但其动力学因免疫细胞类型和性别差异而异,这可能是病毒感染结果不同的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of immunology
Journal of immunology 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.30%
发文量
495
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The JI publishes novel, peer-reviewed findings in all areas of experimental immunology, including innate and adaptive immunity, inflammation, host defense, clinical immunology, autoimmunity and more. Special sections include Cutting Edge articles, Brief Reviews and Pillars of Immunology. The JI is published by The American Association of Immunologists (AAI)
期刊最新文献
Identification of a Specific Granular Marker of Zebrafish Eosinophils Enables Development of New Tools for Their Study. IL-33 Increases the Magnitude of the Tissue-Resident Memory T Cell Response in Intestinal Tissues during Local Infection. Rhesus Macaque Killer Cell Ig-like Receptor Domain 0 Glycans Impact Surface Expression and Ligand Specificity. Suppression of Class Switch Recombination to IgA by RASA2 and RASA3 through Inhibition of TGF-β Signaling. The Marginal Zone B Cell Compartment and T Cell-independent Antibody Responses Are Supported by B Cell Intrinsic Expression of IRF1.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1