Walking on a Balance Beam as a New Measure of Dynamic Balance to Predict Falls in Older Adults and Patients with Neurological Conditions.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Medicine - Open Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1186/s40798-024-00723-7
Tibor Hortobágyi, Tomas Vetrovsky, Azusa Uematsu, Lianne Sanders, Andréia Abud da Silva Costa, Rosangela Alice Batistela, Renato Moraes, Urs Granacher, Szilvia Szabó-Kóra, Bence Csutorás, Klaudia Széphelyi, József Tollár
{"title":"Walking on a Balance Beam as a New Measure of Dynamic Balance to Predict Falls in Older Adults and Patients with Neurological Conditions.","authors":"Tibor Hortobágyi, Tomas Vetrovsky, Azusa Uematsu, Lianne Sanders, Andréia Abud da Silva Costa, Rosangela Alice Batistela, Renato Moraes, Urs Granacher, Szilvia Szabó-Kóra, Bence Csutorás, Klaudia Széphelyi, József Tollár","doi":"10.1186/s40798-024-00723-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Beam walking is a new test to estimate dynamic balance. We characterized dynamic balance measured by the distance walked on beams of different widths in five age groups of healthy adults (20, 30, 40, 50, 60 years) and individuals with neurological conditions (i.e., Parkinson, multiple sclerosis, stroke, age: 66.9 years) and determined if beam walking distance predicted prospective falls over 12 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals with (n = 97) and without neurological conditions (n = 99, healthy adults, age 20-60) participated in this prospective longitudinal study. Falls analyses over 12 months were conducted. The summed distance walked under single (walking only) and dual-task conditions (walking and serial subtraction by 7 between 300 to 900) on three beams (4, 8, and 12-cm wide) was used in the analyses. Additional functional tests comprised grip strength and the Short Physical Performance Battery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Beam walking distance was unaffected on the 12-cm-wide beam in the healthy adult groups. The distance walked on the 8-cm-wide beam decreased by 0.34 m in the 20-year-old group. This reduction was ~ 3 × greater, 1.1 m, in the 60-year-old group. In patients, beam walking distances decreased sharply by 0.8 m on the 8 versus 12 cm beam and by additional 1.6 m on the 4 versus 8 cm beam. Beam walking distance under single and dual-task conditions was linearly but weakly associated with age (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.21 for single task, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.27 for dual-task). Age, disease, and beam width affected distance walked on the beam. Beam walking distance predicted future falls in the combined population of healthy adults and patients with neurological conditions. Based on receiver operating characteristic curve analyses using data from the entire study population, walking ~ 8.0 of the 12 m maximum on low-lying beams predicted future fallers with reasonable accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Balance beam walking is a new but worthwhile measure of dynamic balance to predict falls in the combined population of healthy adults and patients with neurological conditions. Future studies are needed to evaluate the predictive capability of beam walking separately in more homogenous populations. Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT03532984.</p>","PeriodicalId":21788,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine - Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11111647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine - Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-024-00723-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Beam walking is a new test to estimate dynamic balance. We characterized dynamic balance measured by the distance walked on beams of different widths in five age groups of healthy adults (20, 30, 40, 50, 60 years) and individuals with neurological conditions (i.e., Parkinson, multiple sclerosis, stroke, age: 66.9 years) and determined if beam walking distance predicted prospective falls over 12 months.

Methods: Individuals with (n = 97) and without neurological conditions (n = 99, healthy adults, age 20-60) participated in this prospective longitudinal study. Falls analyses over 12 months were conducted. The summed distance walked under single (walking only) and dual-task conditions (walking and serial subtraction by 7 between 300 to 900) on three beams (4, 8, and 12-cm wide) was used in the analyses. Additional functional tests comprised grip strength and the Short Physical Performance Battery.

Results: Beam walking distance was unaffected on the 12-cm-wide beam in the healthy adult groups. The distance walked on the 8-cm-wide beam decreased by 0.34 m in the 20-year-old group. This reduction was ~ 3 × greater, 1.1 m, in the 60-year-old group. In patients, beam walking distances decreased sharply by 0.8 m on the 8 versus 12 cm beam and by additional 1.6 m on the 4 versus 8 cm beam. Beam walking distance under single and dual-task conditions was linearly but weakly associated with age (R2 = 0.21 for single task, R2 = 0.27 for dual-task). Age, disease, and beam width affected distance walked on the beam. Beam walking distance predicted future falls in the combined population of healthy adults and patients with neurological conditions. Based on receiver operating characteristic curve analyses using data from the entire study population, walking ~ 8.0 of the 12 m maximum on low-lying beams predicted future fallers with reasonable accuracy.

Conclusion: Balance beam walking is a new but worthwhile measure of dynamic balance to predict falls in the combined population of healthy adults and patients with neurological conditions. Future studies are needed to evaluate the predictive capability of beam walking separately in more homogenous populations. Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT03532984.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在平衡木上行走是预测老年人和神经系统疾病患者跌倒的动态平衡新测量方法。
背景:横梁行走是一种评估动态平衡的新测试方法。我们对五个年龄组的健康成年人(20、30、40、50、60 岁)和神经系统疾病患者(即帕金森、多发性硬化、中风,年龄:66.9 岁)进行了动态平衡测量,通过在不同宽度的横梁上行走的距离来确定动态平衡的特征,并确定横梁行走距离是否能预测 12 个月内的预期跌倒:方法:患有(n = 97)和未患有神经系统疾病(n = 99,健康成年人,年龄 20-60 岁)的个体参与了这项前瞻性纵向研究。对 12 个月内的跌倒情况进行了分析。分析采用了在三根横梁(宽 4 厘米、8 厘米和 12 厘米)上单任务(仅步行)和双任务(步行和在 300 到 900 之间连续减去 7)情况下的步行距离总和。其他功能测试包括握力和短期体能测试:结果:在 12 厘米宽的横梁上,健康成人组的横梁行走距离不受影响。20 岁组在 8 厘米宽横梁上的行走距离减少了 0.34 米。在 60 岁组中,这一下降幅度是之前的 3 倍,即 1.1 米。在患者中,8 厘米横梁与 12 厘米横梁相比,横梁行走距离锐减了 0.8 米,4 厘米横梁与 8 厘米横梁相比,横梁行走距离增加了 1.6 米。单任务和双任务条件下的光束行走距离与年龄呈线性关系,但关系较弱(单任务的 R2 = 0.21,双任务的 R2 = 0.27)。年龄、疾病和横梁宽度都会影响横梁行走距离。横梁行走距离可预测健康成年人和神经系统疾病患者的未来跌倒情况。根据对整个研究人群数据的接收器操作特征曲线分析,在低位横梁上行走~8.0米(最大值为12米)可预测未来跌倒者的准确性:平衡木行走是一种新的动态平衡测量方法,可用于预测健康成年人和神经系统疾病患者的跌倒情况,值得推广。未来的研究还需要对横梁行走在更多同质人群中的预测能力进行单独评估。临床试验注册号:NCT03532984。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Medicine - Open
Sports Medicine - Open SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sleeping Beauty? A Prospective Study on the Prevalence of Sleep Problems and Their Potential Determinants in Professional Dancers. Correction: Sex Differences in Performance and Performance-Determining Factors in the Olympic Winter Endurance Sports. Critical Fluctuations as an Early Warning Signal of Sports Injuries? A Proof of Concept Using Football Monitoring Data. The Use of Extended Reality Technologies in Sport Perceptual-Cognitive Skill Research: A Systematic Scoping Review. Association Between Inter-Limb Asymmetry and Determinants of Middle- and Long-distance Running Performance in Healthy Populations: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1