Pleasure and Satisfaction as Predictors of Future Cigarette and E-cigarette Use: A Novel Two-Stage Modeling Approach.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Nicotine & Tobacco Research Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntae121
Donald Hedeker, Julia Brooks, Kathleen Diviak, Nancy Jao, Robin J Mermelstein
{"title":"Pleasure and Satisfaction as Predictors of Future Cigarette and E-cigarette Use: A Novel Two-Stage Modeling Approach.","authors":"Donald Hedeker, Julia Brooks, Kathleen Diviak, Nancy Jao, Robin J Mermelstein","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Subjective experience of e-cigarettes may be an important factor in helping people who use combustible cigarettes switch completely to e-cigarettes to reduce harm from smoking. This paper describes a novel two-stage analysis using pleasure and satisfaction responses from ecological momentary assessments (EMA) of both cigarette and e-cigarette use to predict future cigarette and e-cigarette tobacco use.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>This observational study included adult users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes who provided 7 days of EMA, capturing cigarette and e-cigarette use, followed by biweekly reports of cigarette and e-cigarette use over 1 year. Participants were 279 adults who provided both cigarette and e-cigarette responses during the EMA. We employed a two-stage analytic approach in which EMA data were used to predict subsequent levels of cigarette and e-cigarette use. In the first stage, EMA responses to cigarette and e-cigarette events were modeled via a mixed-effects location scale model to yield summaries of participants' means and variability on event-related ratings of pleasure and satisfaction. These EMA summaries served as predictors in the second stage analysis of the biweekly post-EMA longitudinal cigarette and e-cigarette use data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EMA pleasure and satisfaction ratings were similar for both products and predicted both longitudinal cigarette and e-cigarette use, even after controlling for baseline cigarette and e-cigarette dependence. Relatively higher levels of satisfaction with e-cigarettes were associated with greater decreases in cigarette use over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pleasure and satisfaction are important predictors of subsequent cigarette and e-cigarette use.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Experienced subjective pleasure and satisfaction from e-cigarettes relative to cigarettes may be an important factor in helping individuals who smoke to switch completely to e-cigarettes as a harm reduction approach. In order to help sustain complete product switching and reduce dual use or relapse to smoking, e-cigarettes may need to deliver more satisfaction to the user compared to that experienced from cigarettes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494478/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae121","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Subjective experience of e-cigarettes may be an important factor in helping people who use combustible cigarettes switch completely to e-cigarettes to reduce harm from smoking. This paper describes a novel two-stage analysis using pleasure and satisfaction responses from ecological momentary assessments (EMA) of both cigarette and e-cigarette use to predict future cigarette and e-cigarette tobacco use.

Aims and methods: This observational study included adult users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes who provided 7 days of EMA, capturing cigarette and e-cigarette use, followed by biweekly reports of cigarette and e-cigarette use over 1 year. Participants were 279 adults who provided both cigarette and e-cigarette responses during the EMA. We employed a two-stage analytic approach in which EMA data were used to predict subsequent levels of cigarette and e-cigarette use. In the first stage, EMA responses to cigarette and e-cigarette events were modeled via a mixed-effects location scale model to yield summaries of participants' means and variability on event-related ratings of pleasure and satisfaction. These EMA summaries served as predictors in the second stage analysis of the biweekly post-EMA longitudinal cigarette and e-cigarette use data.

Results: EMA pleasure and satisfaction ratings were similar for both products and predicted both longitudinal cigarette and e-cigarette use, even after controlling for baseline cigarette and e-cigarette dependence. Relatively higher levels of satisfaction with e-cigarettes were associated with greater decreases in cigarette use over time.

Conclusions: Pleasure and satisfaction are important predictors of subsequent cigarette and e-cigarette use.

Implications: Experienced subjective pleasure and satisfaction from e-cigarettes relative to cigarettes may be an important factor in helping individuals who smoke to switch completely to e-cigarettes as a harm reduction approach. In order to help sustain complete product switching and reduce dual use or relapse to smoking, e-cigarettes may need to deliver more satisfaction to the user compared to that experienced from cigarettes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快乐和满足感是未来使用香烟和电子烟的预测因素:一种新颖的两阶段建模方法
导言:电子烟的主观体验可能是帮助使用可燃卷烟的人完全转用电子烟以减少吸烟危害的一个重要因素。本文介绍了一种新颖的两阶段分析方法,即利用对卷烟和电子烟使用情况的生态瞬间评估(EMA)中的愉悦感和满意度反应来预测未来卷烟和电子烟的使用情况:这项观察性研究的参与者包括卷烟和电子烟的成年使用者,他们提供了 7 天的 EMA,记录了卷烟和电子烟的使用情况,之后在一年内每两周报告一次卷烟和电子烟的使用情况。参与者为 279 名成年人,他们在 EMA 期间提供了卷烟和电子烟使用情况。我们采用了两阶段分析方法,利用 EMA 数据预测随后的香烟和电子烟使用水平。在第一阶段,通过混合效应位置量表(MELS)模型对卷烟和电子烟事件的 EMA 反应进行建模,以得出参与者对事件相关的愉悦感和满意度评分的平均值和变异性总结。在对 EMA 后的双周纵向香烟和电子烟使用数据进行第二阶段分析时,这些 EMA 总结可作为预测因素:结果:两种产品的 EMA 愉悦度和满意度评分相似,即使在控制了基线香烟和电子烟依赖性之后,也能预测香烟和电子烟的纵向使用情况。随着时间的推移,对电子烟的满意度相对较高与香烟使用量的减少有关:结论:愉悦感和满意度是预测后续卷烟和电子烟使用的重要因素:相对于香烟,电子烟带来的主观愉悦感和满意度可能是帮助吸烟者完全转用电子烟作为减害方法的重要因素。为了帮助维持完全的产品转换并减少双重使用或复吸,电子烟可能需要给使用者带来比从香烟中获得的更多的满足感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
期刊最新文献
The Context of the Emergency Department as a Location for a Smoking Cessation Intervention-Process Evaluation Findings From the Cessation of Smoking Trial in the Emergency Department Trial. Behavioral Interventions for Tobacco Cessation in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Effects of E-Cigarettes on Combustible Cigarette Smoking Among Adults with Opioid Use Disorder on Buprenorphine: Single Arm ERASER Pilot Trial. Vaping and smoking cue reactivity in young adult non-smoking electronic cigarette users: A functional neuroimaging study. Do-it-yourself flavored capsule cigarettes: Exploiting potential regulatory loopholes?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1