Effectiveness of Photobiomodulation in Reducing Pain and Disability in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1093/ptj/pzae073
Sofia Oliveira, Renato Andrade, Cristina Valente, João Espregueira-Mendes, Filipe S Silva, Betina B Hinckel, Óscar Carvalho, Ana Leal
{"title":"Effectiveness of Photobiomodulation in Reducing Pain and Disability in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Sofia Oliveira, Renato Andrade, Cristina Valente, João Espregueira-Mendes, Filipe S Silva, Betina B Hinckel, Óscar Carvalho, Ana Leal","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzae073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Photobiomodulation (PBM) is not implemented in routine clinical management for knee osteoarthritis. This study aims to systematically investigate the effects of PBM in patients with knee osteoarthritis, comparing with placebo to understand its true clinical effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched up to October 2023. Randomized placebo-controlled trials applying PBM versus placebo were included. Study characteristics, intervention parameters, and patient-reported and physical examination outcome measures were collected. The risk of bias was judged using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (version 2) and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to interpret the certainty of results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies were included comprising 542 participants. All studies were judged with unclear to a high risk of bias. Meta-analysis for pain at rest (6 studies) showed that PBM significantly reduced pain at rest as compared to placebo (-0.7 [95% CI = -1.1 to -0.2]), moderate effect, very low certainty of evidence, whereas for the Timed \"Up & Go\" Test (three studies), no significant effect was detected. Statistically significantly within-group (PBM) mean improvement was detected for pain, Lequesne Index, and gait performance outcomes, but not always clinically relevant or significant when compared to placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PBM reduces pain intensity in patients with knee osteoarthritis and may improve disability. However, the very low certainty of evidence does not allow to recommend its isolated use but may be used to complement other widely recommended therapies. More rigorous clinical trials and the revision of the recommended dosage guidelines are warranted to increase the strength of evidence.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>The findings indicate that photobiomodulation can reduce pain and improve disability in patients with knee osteoarthritis. However, researchers should continue to investigate isolated photobiomodulation intervention versus placebo and extend the dosage guidelines to other types of light emitters.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzae073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Photobiomodulation (PBM) is not implemented in routine clinical management for knee osteoarthritis. This study aims to systematically investigate the effects of PBM in patients with knee osteoarthritis, comparing with placebo to understand its true clinical effects.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched up to October 2023. Randomized placebo-controlled trials applying PBM versus placebo were included. Study characteristics, intervention parameters, and patient-reported and physical examination outcome measures were collected. The risk of bias was judged using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (version 2) and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to interpret the certainty of results.

Results: Ten studies were included comprising 542 participants. All studies were judged with unclear to a high risk of bias. Meta-analysis for pain at rest (6 studies) showed that PBM significantly reduced pain at rest as compared to placebo (-0.7 [95% CI = -1.1 to -0.2]), moderate effect, very low certainty of evidence, whereas for the Timed "Up & Go" Test (three studies), no significant effect was detected. Statistically significantly within-group (PBM) mean improvement was detected for pain, Lequesne Index, and gait performance outcomes, but not always clinically relevant or significant when compared to placebo.

Conclusion: PBM reduces pain intensity in patients with knee osteoarthritis and may improve disability. However, the very low certainty of evidence does not allow to recommend its isolated use but may be used to complement other widely recommended therapies. More rigorous clinical trials and the revision of the recommended dosage guidelines are warranted to increase the strength of evidence.

Impact: The findings indicate that photobiomodulation can reduce pain and improve disability in patients with knee osteoarthritis. However, researchers should continue to investigate isolated photobiomodulation intervention versus placebo and extend the dosage guidelines to other types of light emitters.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
光生物调节对减轻膝骨关节炎患者疼痛和残疾的效果:系统回顾与元分析》。
目的:光生物调节(PBM)尚未应用于膝关节骨性关节炎的常规临床治疗中。本研究旨在系统调查光生物调控对膝骨关节炎患者的影响,并与安慰剂进行比较,以了解其真正的临床效果:方法:检索截至 2023 年 10 月的 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 数据库。方法:检索了截至 2023 年 10 月的 PubMMBASE、Web Science 和 Cochrane 数据库,纳入了采用 PBM 与安慰剂对比的随机安慰剂对照试验。收集了研究特征、干预参数、患者报告和体格检查结果指标。采用Cochrane随机试验偏倚风险工具(第2版)和建议评估、发展和评价分级法(GRADE)判断偏倚风险,以解释结果的确定性:结果:共纳入 10 项研究,参与人数达 542 人。所有研究均被判定为偏倚风险不明确或偏倚风险较高。休息时疼痛的 Meta 分析(6 项研究)显示,与安慰剂相比,PBM 能显著减轻休息时的疼痛(-0.7 [95% CI = -1.1 至 -0.2]),效果适中,证据确定性极低,而对于定时 "站起来走 "测试(3 项研究),未发现显著效果。与安慰剂相比,组内(PBM)疼痛、勒克斯指数和步态表现结果的平均改善程度在统计学上有明显提高,但并不总是具有临床相关性或显著性:结论:PBM 可降低膝骨关节炎患者的疼痛强度,并可改善残疾状况。然而,由于证据的确定性很低,因此不建议单独使用该疗法,但可以作为其他广泛推荐疗法的补充。有必要进行更严格的临床试验并修订推荐剂量指南,以提高证据的说服力:研究结果表明,光生物调节疗法可以减轻膝关节骨关节炎患者的疼痛并改善残疾状况。然而,研究人员应继续研究单独的光生物调制干预与安慰剂的比较,并将剂量指南扩展到其他类型的光发射器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.
期刊最新文献
"It's Just Really Important for us all to be on the Same Page": Qualitative Evaluation of Factors that Influence Written Mobility Communication. Author Response to Hébert and Perron. On "Concerns on the Science and Practice of a Movement System." Joyce CT, Beneciuk JM, George SZ. Phys Ther. 2023;103:pzad087. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzad087. From Knowledge to Action: Fostering Advocacy Skills for Planetary Health in Physical Therapy. Fine Motor Impairment and Its Impact on Social Outcomes in Survivors of Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1