Sex-dependent differences in vulnerability to early risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder: results from the AURORA study.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Psychological Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1017/S0033291724000941
Stephanie Haering, Antonia V Seligowski, Sarah D Linnstaedt, Vasiliki Michopoulos, Stacey L House, Francesca L Beaudoin, Xinming An, Thomas C Neylan, Gari D Clifford, Laura T Germine, Scott L Rauch, John P Haran, Alan B Storrow, Christopher Lewandowski, Paul I Musey, Phyllis L Hendry, Sophia Sheikh, Christopher W Jones, Brittany E Punches, Robert A Swor, Nina T Gentile, Lauren A Hudak, Jose L Pascual, Mark J Seamon, Claire Pearson, David A Peak, Roland C Merchant, Robert M Domeier, Niels K Rathlev, Brian J O'Neil, Leon D Sanchez, Steven E Bruce, Steven E Harte, Samuel A McLean, Ronald C Kessler, Karestan C Koenen, Jennifer S Stevens, Abigail Powers
{"title":"Sex-dependent differences in vulnerability to early risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder: results from the AURORA study.","authors":"Stephanie Haering, Antonia V Seligowski, Sarah D Linnstaedt, Vasiliki Michopoulos, Stacey L House, Francesca L Beaudoin, Xinming An, Thomas C Neylan, Gari D Clifford, Laura T Germine, Scott L Rauch, John P Haran, Alan B Storrow, Christopher Lewandowski, Paul I Musey, Phyllis L Hendry, Sophia Sheikh, Christopher W Jones, Brittany E Punches, Robert A Swor, Nina T Gentile, Lauren A Hudak, Jose L Pascual, Mark J Seamon, Claire Pearson, David A Peak, Roland C Merchant, Robert M Domeier, Niels K Rathlev, Brian J O'Neil, Leon D Sanchez, Steven E Bruce, Steven E Harte, Samuel A McLean, Ronald C Kessler, Karestan C Koenen, Jennifer S Stevens, Abigail Powers","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724000941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knowledge of sex differences in risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can contribute to the development of refined preventive interventions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine if women and men differ in their vulnerability to risk factors for PTSD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of the longitudinal AURORA study, 2924 patients seeking emergency department (ED) treatment in the acute aftermath of trauma provided self-report assessments of pre- peri- and post-traumatic risk factors, as well as 3-month PTSD severity. We systematically examined sex-dependent effects of 16 risk factors that have previously been hypothesized to show different associations with PTSD severity in women and men.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women reported higher PTSD severity at 3-months post-trauma. <i>Z</i>-score comparisons indicated that for five of the 16 examined risk factors the association with 3-month PTSD severity was stronger in men than in women. In multivariable models, interaction effects with sex were observed for pre-traumatic anxiety symptoms, and acute dissociative symptoms; both showed stronger associations with PTSD in men than in women. Subgroup analyses suggested trauma type-conditional effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate mechanisms to which men might be particularly vulnerable, demonstrating that known PTSD risk factors might behave differently in women and men. Analyses did not identify any risk factors to which women were more vulnerable than men, pointing toward further mechanisms to explain women's higher PTSD risk. Our study illustrates the need for a more systematic examination of sex differences in contributors to PTSD severity after trauma, which may inform refined preventive interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724000941","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Knowledge of sex differences in risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can contribute to the development of refined preventive interventions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine if women and men differ in their vulnerability to risk factors for PTSD.

Methods: As part of the longitudinal AURORA study, 2924 patients seeking emergency department (ED) treatment in the acute aftermath of trauma provided self-report assessments of pre- peri- and post-traumatic risk factors, as well as 3-month PTSD severity. We systematically examined sex-dependent effects of 16 risk factors that have previously been hypothesized to show different associations with PTSD severity in women and men.

Results: Women reported higher PTSD severity at 3-months post-trauma. Z-score comparisons indicated that for five of the 16 examined risk factors the association with 3-month PTSD severity was stronger in men than in women. In multivariable models, interaction effects with sex were observed for pre-traumatic anxiety symptoms, and acute dissociative symptoms; both showed stronger associations with PTSD in men than in women. Subgroup analyses suggested trauma type-conditional effects.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate mechanisms to which men might be particularly vulnerable, demonstrating that known PTSD risk factors might behave differently in women and men. Analyses did not identify any risk factors to which women were more vulnerable than men, pointing toward further mechanisms to explain women's higher PTSD risk. Our study illustrates the need for a more systematic examination of sex differences in contributors to PTSD severity after trauma, which may inform refined preventive interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤后应激障碍早期风险因素的性别差异:AURORA 研究的结果。
背景:了解创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)风险因素的性别差异有助于制定完善的预防干预措施。因此,本研究旨在探讨女性和男性在创伤后应激障碍风险因素方面是否存在差异:作为 AURORA 纵向研究的一部分,2924 名在创伤后急性期寻求急诊科(ED)治疗的患者提供了创伤前后风险因素的自我报告评估,以及 3 个月的创伤后应激障碍严重程度。我们系统地研究了 16 个风险因素的性别依赖效应,这些因素曾被假设与女性和男性的创伤后应激障碍严重程度有不同的关联:结果:女性在创伤后 3 个月的创伤后应激障碍严重程度较高。Z-score比较表明,在16个被研究的风险因素中,有5个因素与3个月后创伤后应激障碍严重程度的关联性男性强于女性。在多变量模型中,创伤前焦虑症状和急性分离症状与性别的交互效应被观察到;这两种症状与创伤后应激障碍的关系在男性中都比在女性中更强。分组分析表明了创伤类型的条件效应:我们的研究结果表明了男性可能特别容易受到创伤后应激障碍影响的机制,同时也证明了已知的创伤后应激障碍风险因素在女性和男性身上可能会有不同的表现。分析没有发现女性比男性更容易受到影响的风险因素,这表明女性患创伤后应激障碍风险较高的原因还有其他机制。我们的研究表明,有必要对创伤后创伤后应激障碍严重程度的性别差异进行更系统的研究,从而为完善预防干预措施提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
期刊最新文献
Beyond IQ: executive function deficits and their relation to functional, clinical, and neuroimaging outcomes in 3q29 deletion syndrome. Complex PTSD symptoms predict positive symptoms of psychosis in the flow of daily life. Digital assessment of nonverbal behaviors forecasts first onset of depression. Genetic and molecular correlates of cortical thickness alterations in adults with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a transcription-neuroimaging association analysis. Influence of perceived harm due to substance use on the relationships between positive psychotic experiences and suicidal experiences in people with non-affective psychosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1