Transfemoral hepatic vein catheterization reduces procedure time in double vein embolization.

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CVIR Endovascular Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1186/s42155-024-00463-5
Dominik A Steffen, Arash Najafi, Christoph A Binkert
{"title":"Transfemoral hepatic vein catheterization reduces procedure time in double vein embolization.","authors":"Dominik A Steffen, Arash Najafi, Christoph A Binkert","doi":"10.1186/s42155-024-00463-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Double vein embolization with simultaneous embolization of the portal and hepatic vein aims to grow the future liver remnant in preparation for major hepatectomy. Transvenous hepatic vein embolization is usually done via a transjugular access. The purpose of this study is to describe the transfemoral approach as an alternative option and to discuss potential advantages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three patients undergoing hepatic vein embolization via a transjugular (n = 10) or transfemoral access (n = 13) were evaluated retrospectively. In all cases the portal vein embolization was done first. All procedures were technically successful. There were no peri-interventional complications. Only two patients were not able to proceed to surgery. Standardized future liver remnant hypertrophy was non-inferior with the transfemoral approach compared to the transjugular route. Procedure time was significantly shorter in the transfemoral access group (40 ± 13 min) compared to the transjugular group (67 ± 13 min, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transfemoral hepatic vein embolization is feasible, safe, and faster due to easier catheterization, improved stability, and simpler patient preparation. These findings will need to be validated in larger studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":52351,"journal":{"name":"CVIR Endovascular","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11111621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CVIR Endovascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-024-00463-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Double vein embolization with simultaneous embolization of the portal and hepatic vein aims to grow the future liver remnant in preparation for major hepatectomy. Transvenous hepatic vein embolization is usually done via a transjugular access. The purpose of this study is to describe the transfemoral approach as an alternative option and to discuss potential advantages.

Results: Twenty-three patients undergoing hepatic vein embolization via a transjugular (n = 10) or transfemoral access (n = 13) were evaluated retrospectively. In all cases the portal vein embolization was done first. All procedures were technically successful. There were no peri-interventional complications. Only two patients were not able to proceed to surgery. Standardized future liver remnant hypertrophy was non-inferior with the transfemoral approach compared to the transjugular route. Procedure time was significantly shorter in the transfemoral access group (40 ± 13 min) compared to the transjugular group (67 ± 13 min, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Transfemoral hepatic vein embolization is feasible, safe, and faster due to easier catheterization, improved stability, and simpler patient preparation. These findings will need to be validated in larger studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经股动脉肝静脉导管术缩短了双静脉栓塞术的手术时间。
背景:同时栓塞门静脉和肝静脉的双静脉栓塞术旨在培植未来的残肝,为大肝切除术做准备。经静脉肝静脉栓塞通常通过经颈静脉入路进行。本研究的目的是描述经股静脉入路作为一种替代选择,并讨论其潜在的优势:对23例经颈静脉(10例)或经股动脉(13例)进行肝静脉栓塞的患者进行了回顾性评估。所有病例都是先进行门静脉栓塞。所有手术在技术上都很成功。没有发生介入周围并发症。只有两名患者无法进行手术。与经颈静脉途径相比,经股动脉途径的标准未来残肝肥大效果并不差。经股动脉入路组的手术时间(40 ± 13 分钟)明显短于经颈静脉入路组(67 ± 13 分钟,P 结论:经股动脉入路组的手术时间明显短于经颈静脉入路组:经股动脉肝静脉栓塞术可行、安全、快捷,因为导管插入更容易、稳定性更好、患者准备更简单。这些发现需要在更大规模的研究中得到验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CVIR Endovascular
CVIR Endovascular Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
Feasibility of an antegrade-retrograde single-sheath inverse technique via vertical puncture in dysfunctional hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula angioplasty. Correction: Interventional solutions for post‑surgical problems: a lymphatic leaks review Carbon dioxide-enhanced angiography for detection of colonic diverticular bleeding and clinical outcomes Investigating the effects of percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm on the lumen size of the common femoral artery Transjugular antegrade transvenous obliteration, with and without portal decompression, for management of rectal variceal hemorrhage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1