IMplementation of the Preterm Birth Surveillance PAthway: a RealisT evaluation (The IMPART Study).

Naomi Carlisle, Sonia Dalkin, Andrew H Shennan, Jane Sandall
{"title":"IMplementation of the Preterm Birth Surveillance PAthway: a RealisT evaluation (The IMPART Study).","authors":"Naomi Carlisle, Sonia Dalkin, Andrew H Shennan, Jane Sandall","doi":"10.1186/s43058-024-00594-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the UK, 7.6% of babies are born preterm, which the Department of Health aims to decrease to 6% by 2025. To advance this, NHS England released Saving Babies Lives Care Bundle Version 2 Element 5, recommending the Preterm Birth Pathway for women at risk of preterm birth. The success of this new pathway depends on its implementation. The IMPART (IMplementation of the Preterm Birth Surveillance PAthway: a RealisT evaluation) study aimed to research how, why, for whom, to what extent and in what contexts the prediction and prevention aspects of Preterm Birth Surveillance Pathway is implemented through a realist evaluation. Realist implementation studies are growing in popularity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Initial programme theories were developed through a realist informed literature scope, interviews with developers of the NHS England guidance, and a national questionnaire of current practice. Implementation theory was utilised in developing the programme theories. Data (interviews and observations with staff and women) were undertaken in 3 case sites in England to 'test' the programme theories. Substantive theory was utilised during data analysis to interpret and refine the theories on how implementation could be improved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three explanatory areas were developed: risk assessing and referral; the preterm birth surveillance clinic; and women centred care. Explanatory area 1 dealt with the problems in correct risk assessment and referral to a preterm clinic. Explanatory area 2 focused on how once a correct referral has been made to a preterm clinic, knowledgeable and supported clinicians can deliver a well-functioning clinic. Explanatory area 3 concentrated on how the pathway delivers appropriate care to women.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IMPART study provides several areas where implementation could be improved. These include educating clinicians on knowledge of risk factors and the purpose of the preterm clinic, having a multidisciplinary preterm team (including a preterm midwife) with specialist preterm knowledge and skills (including transvaginal cervical scanning skills), and sites actively working with their local network. This multidisciplinary preterm team are placed to deliver continuity of care for women at high-risk of preterm birth, being attentive to their history but also ensuring they are not defined by their risk status.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN57127874.</p>","PeriodicalId":73355,"journal":{"name":"Implementation science communications","volume":"5 1","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11110199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation science communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00594-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the UK, 7.6% of babies are born preterm, which the Department of Health aims to decrease to 6% by 2025. To advance this, NHS England released Saving Babies Lives Care Bundle Version 2 Element 5, recommending the Preterm Birth Pathway for women at risk of preterm birth. The success of this new pathway depends on its implementation. The IMPART (IMplementation of the Preterm Birth Surveillance PAthway: a RealisT evaluation) study aimed to research how, why, for whom, to what extent and in what contexts the prediction and prevention aspects of Preterm Birth Surveillance Pathway is implemented through a realist evaluation. Realist implementation studies are growing in popularity.

Methods: Initial programme theories were developed through a realist informed literature scope, interviews with developers of the NHS England guidance, and a national questionnaire of current practice. Implementation theory was utilised in developing the programme theories. Data (interviews and observations with staff and women) were undertaken in 3 case sites in England to 'test' the programme theories. Substantive theory was utilised during data analysis to interpret and refine the theories on how implementation could be improved.

Results: Three explanatory areas were developed: risk assessing and referral; the preterm birth surveillance clinic; and women centred care. Explanatory area 1 dealt with the problems in correct risk assessment and referral to a preterm clinic. Explanatory area 2 focused on how once a correct referral has been made to a preterm clinic, knowledgeable and supported clinicians can deliver a well-functioning clinic. Explanatory area 3 concentrated on how the pathway delivers appropriate care to women.

Conclusions: The IMPART study provides several areas where implementation could be improved. These include educating clinicians on knowledge of risk factors and the purpose of the preterm clinic, having a multidisciplinary preterm team (including a preterm midwife) with specialist preterm knowledge and skills (including transvaginal cervical scanning skills), and sites actively working with their local network. This multidisciplinary preterm team are placed to deliver continuity of care for women at high-risk of preterm birth, being attentive to their history but also ensuring they are not defined by their risk status.

Trial registration: ISRCTN57127874.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早产监测途径的实施:真实评估(IMPART 研究)。
背景:在英国,早产儿的比例为 7.6%,卫生部的目标是到 2025 年将这一比例降至 6%。为推动这一目标的实现,英国国家医疗服务体系发布了《挽救婴儿生命护理包》第 2 版第 5 要素,建议为有早产风险的妇女提供早产路径。这一新路径的成功取决于其实施情况。IMPART(早产监测途径的实施:现实主义评估)研究旨在通过现实主义评估,研究早产监测途径的预测和预防方面如何实施、为何实施、为谁实施、实施程度如何以及在何种情况下实施。现实主义实施研究越来越受欢迎:方法:通过现实主义文献范围、对英格兰国家医疗服务体系指南制定者的访谈以及对当前实践的全国性问卷调查,形成了初步的计划理论。在制定计划理论时采用了实施理论。在英格兰的 3 个案例地点收集数据(与工作人员和妇女进行访谈和观察),以 "检验 "计划理论。在数据分析过程中,利用了实质性理论来解释和完善如何改进实施的理论:提出了三个解释领域:风险评估和转诊、早产监测诊所和以妇女为中心的护理。解释领域 1 涉及正确的风险评估和转介到早产诊所的问题。解释性说明 2 的重点是,一旦正确转介到早产儿诊所,有知识和有支持的临床医生如何能够提供一个运作良好的诊所。解释性领域 3 集中于该路径如何为妇女提供适当的护理:IMPART 研究提供了几个可以改进实施的领域。这些方面包括:对临床医生进行风险因素和早产门诊目的方面的知识教育,建立一支具备专业早产知识和技能(包括经阴道宫颈扫描技能)的多学科早产团队(包括一名早产助产士),以及各医疗点积极与当地网络合作。这支多学科早产团队将为早产高危妇女提供连续性护理,关注她们的病史,但也确保她们不会被其风险状况所界定:试验注册:ISRCTN57127874。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Audit and feedback is an effective implementation strategy to increase fidelity to a multi-component labor induction protocol designed to reduce obstetric inequities. Development of an implementation intervention to promote adoption of the COMFORT clinical practice guideline for peripartum pain management: a qualitative study. The system can change: a feasibility study of a doula-clinician collaborative at a large tertiary hospital in the United States. Development and evaluation of an implementation strategy to increase HPV vaccination among underserved youth across Texas: a protocol paper. Impact of learning health systems on cross-system collaboration between youth legal and community mental health systems: a type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1