Christopher K Wong, Jennifer Rosati, Kaitlynne Forbes, Shanshan Feng, Aine Donohue, Akinpelumi Beckley
{"title":"A scoping review of postoperative early rehabilitation programs after dysvascular-related amputations.","authors":"Christopher K Wong, Jennifer Rosati, Kaitlynne Forbes, Shanshan Feng, Aine Donohue, Akinpelumi Beckley","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After amputation, people face challenges including wound healing and decreased functional mobility. Early mobilization in acute hospital care has proved safe, improved function, and sped discharge. Still, loss of a leg complicates standing and early mobilization after amputation. Approaches to early mobilization and rehabilitation after amputation surgery have not been widely studied.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To map the evidence regarding early postoperative mobilization after dysvascular amputation. Specific aims included identifying research designs and populations, describing rehabilitation approaches, and identifying gaps within the literature.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Scoping review following PRISMA-Sc guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The a priori scoping review methodology conducted in June 2022 with English language and 20-year limits used the OVID Medline, OVID Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane databases, and Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics archive. Reviewer pairs used Covidence software to screen for inclusion (subjects with major lower limb dysvascular amputations, seen immediately postoperatively for hospital-based rehabilitation) with decisions by concurrence. Data for best practice scoping reviews were synthesized for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred ninety-six citations were screened, 13 full texts reviewed, and 8 articles included: 2 cohort studies, 3 case-control studies, 2 single-group interventional studies, and 1 case study. There were no randomized control trials or prospective comparison group trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Few studies were identified regarding acute rehabilitation after major lower extremity amputation. The limited evidence in this review suggested that early mobilization in the days after amputation was safe with or without use of temporary prostheses, although further research is certainly warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":" ","pages":"558-564"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000361","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: After amputation, people face challenges including wound healing and decreased functional mobility. Early mobilization in acute hospital care has proved safe, improved function, and sped discharge. Still, loss of a leg complicates standing and early mobilization after amputation. Approaches to early mobilization and rehabilitation after amputation surgery have not been widely studied.
Objectives: To map the evidence regarding early postoperative mobilization after dysvascular amputation. Specific aims included identifying research designs and populations, describing rehabilitation approaches, and identifying gaps within the literature.
Study design: Scoping review following PRISMA-Sc guidelines.
Methods: The a priori scoping review methodology conducted in June 2022 with English language and 20-year limits used the OVID Medline, OVID Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane databases, and Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics archive. Reviewer pairs used Covidence software to screen for inclusion (subjects with major lower limb dysvascular amputations, seen immediately postoperatively for hospital-based rehabilitation) with decisions by concurrence. Data for best practice scoping reviews were synthesized for analysis.
Results: Two hundred ninety-six citations were screened, 13 full texts reviewed, and 8 articles included: 2 cohort studies, 3 case-control studies, 2 single-group interventional studies, and 1 case study. There were no randomized control trials or prospective comparison group trials.
Conclusions: Few studies were identified regarding acute rehabilitation after major lower extremity amputation. The limited evidence in this review suggested that early mobilization in the days after amputation was safe with or without use of temporary prostheses, although further research is certainly warranted.
背景:截肢后,人们面临着伤口愈合和功能活动能力下降等挑战。事实证明,在急性期医院护理中进行早期活动是安全的,可以改善功能并加快出院速度。然而,失去一条腿会使截肢后的站立和早期活动变得复杂。截肢手术后早期活动和康复的方法尚未得到广泛研究:绘制有关血管截肢术后早期活动的证据图。研究设计:研究设计:按照 PRISMA-Sc 指南进行范围界定综述:2022年6月进行的先验范围综述方法使用了OVID Medline、OVID Allied and Complementary Medicine Database、Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature、Cochrane数据库以及Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics档案。审稿人对使用 Covidence 软件筛选纳入对象(主要下肢血管障碍截肢者,术后立即到医院进行康复治疗),并通过一致意见做出决定。对最佳实践范围综述的数据进行综合分析:结果:筛选了 296 篇引文,审查了 13 篇全文,纳入了 8 篇文章:其中包括 2 项队列研究、3 项病例对照研究、2 项单组干预研究和 1 项病例研究。没有随机对照试验或前瞻性比较组试验:结论:关于重大下肢截肢后急性康复治疗的研究很少。本综述中的有限证据表明,无论是否使用临时假肢,截肢后数天内的早期活动都是安全的,但仍需进一步研究。
期刊介绍:
Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.