A scoping review of postoperative early rehabilitation programs after dysvascular-related amputations.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Prosthetics and Orthotics International Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1097/PXR.0000000000000361
Christopher K Wong, Jennifer Rosati, Kaitlynne Forbes, Shanshan Feng, Aine Donohue, Akinpelumi Beckley
{"title":"A scoping review of postoperative early rehabilitation programs after dysvascular-related amputations.","authors":"Christopher K Wong, Jennifer Rosati, Kaitlynne Forbes, Shanshan Feng, Aine Donohue, Akinpelumi Beckley","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After amputation, people face challenges including wound healing and decreased functional mobility. Early mobilization in acute hospital care has proved safe, improved function, and sped discharge. Still, loss of a leg complicates standing and early mobilization after amputation. Approaches to early mobilization and rehabilitation after amputation surgery have not been widely studied.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To map the evidence regarding early postoperative mobilization after dysvascular amputation. Specific aims included identifying research designs and populations, describing rehabilitation approaches, and identifying gaps within the literature.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Scoping review following PRISMA-Sc guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The a priori scoping review methodology conducted in June 2022 with English language and 20-year limits used the OVID Medline, OVID Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane databases, and Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics archive. Reviewer pairs used Covidence software to screen for inclusion (subjects with major lower limb dysvascular amputations, seen immediately postoperatively for hospital-based rehabilitation) with decisions by concurrence. Data for best practice scoping reviews were synthesized for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred ninety-six citations were screened, 13 full texts reviewed, and 8 articles included: 2 cohort studies, 3 case-control studies, 2 single-group interventional studies, and 1 case study. There were no randomized control trials or prospective comparison group trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Few studies were identified regarding acute rehabilitation after major lower extremity amputation. The limited evidence in this review suggested that early mobilization in the days after amputation was safe with or without use of temporary prostheses, although further research is certainly warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":" ","pages":"558-564"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000361","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: After amputation, people face challenges including wound healing and decreased functional mobility. Early mobilization in acute hospital care has proved safe, improved function, and sped discharge. Still, loss of a leg complicates standing and early mobilization after amputation. Approaches to early mobilization and rehabilitation after amputation surgery have not been widely studied.

Objectives: To map the evidence regarding early postoperative mobilization after dysvascular amputation. Specific aims included identifying research designs and populations, describing rehabilitation approaches, and identifying gaps within the literature.

Study design: Scoping review following PRISMA-Sc guidelines.

Methods: The a priori scoping review methodology conducted in June 2022 with English language and 20-year limits used the OVID Medline, OVID Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane databases, and Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics archive. Reviewer pairs used Covidence software to screen for inclusion (subjects with major lower limb dysvascular amputations, seen immediately postoperatively for hospital-based rehabilitation) with decisions by concurrence. Data for best practice scoping reviews were synthesized for analysis.

Results: Two hundred ninety-six citations were screened, 13 full texts reviewed, and 8 articles included: 2 cohort studies, 3 case-control studies, 2 single-group interventional studies, and 1 case study. There were no randomized control trials or prospective comparison group trials.

Conclusions: Few studies were identified regarding acute rehabilitation after major lower extremity amputation. The limited evidence in this review suggested that early mobilization in the days after amputation was safe with or without use of temporary prostheses, although further research is certainly warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血管相关截肢术后早期康复计划范围综述。
背景:截肢后,人们面临着伤口愈合和功能活动能力下降等挑战。事实证明,在急性期医院护理中进行早期活动是安全的,可以改善功能并加快出院速度。然而,失去一条腿会使截肢后的站立和早期活动变得复杂。截肢手术后早期活动和康复的方法尚未得到广泛研究:绘制有关血管截肢术后早期活动的证据图。研究设计:研究设计:按照 PRISMA-Sc 指南进行范围界定综述:2022年6月进行的先验范围综述方法使用了OVID Medline、OVID Allied and Complementary Medicine Database、Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature、Cochrane数据库以及Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics档案。审稿人对使用 Covidence 软件筛选纳入对象(主要下肢血管障碍截肢者,术后立即到医院进行康复治疗),并通过一致意见做出决定。对最佳实践范围综述的数据进行综合分析:结果:筛选了 296 篇引文,审查了 13 篇全文,纳入了 8 篇文章:其中包括 2 项队列研究、3 项病例对照研究、2 项单组干预研究和 1 项病例研究。没有随机对照试验或前瞻性比较组试验:结论:关于重大下肢截肢后急性康复治疗的研究很少。本综述中的有限证据表明,无论是否使用临时假肢,截肢后数天内的早期活动都是安全的,但仍需进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
期刊最新文献
Returning to work after dysvascular lower limb amputation-A novel multivariate approach to examine relative contributions of biopsychosocial predictors. Biomechanical effects of foot orthoses on jump landing performance: A systematic review. Which factors may influence medium-term quality of life of patients with lower-limb loss? A systematic review of the literature. What are relevant predictors of physical activity in older adults with lower limb loss (LLL)? Results of a retrospective analysis. A scoping review on upper extremity prostheses: Satisfaction, barriers, and their implications in resource-limited countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1