Managing Inconsistent Bladder Volumes in the Prostate Cancer Patient Using Daily Online Adaptive RT: A Case Report.

Q3 Medicine The gulf journal of oncology Pub Date : 2024-05-01
Venkada Manickam Gurusamy, Yoganathan Sullimullur Arunachalam, Mohamed Riyaz Poolakundan, Sarah Fiona Mc Cabe, Rabih Wafiq Hammoud, Noora Al-Hammadi
{"title":"Managing Inconsistent Bladder Volumes in the Prostate Cancer Patient Using Daily Online Adaptive RT: A Case Report.","authors":"Venkada Manickam Gurusamy, Yoganathan Sullimullur Arunachalam, Mohamed Riyaz Poolakundan, Sarah Fiona Mc Cabe, Rabih Wafiq Hammoud, Noora Al-Hammadi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We report the use of online adaptive radiotherapy (OART) aiming to improve dosimetric parameters in the prostate cancer patient who had lower urinary tract symptoms that caused him not to adhere to the standard bladder filling protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>The reference treatment plan for adaptive radiotherapy plan was generated for the pelvis and the solitary bony lesion using the Ethos treatment planning system. For each treatment session, high-quality iterative reconstructed cone beam CT (CBCT) images were acquired, and the system automatically generated an optimal adaptive plan after verification of contours. Image-guided RT (IGRT) plans were also created using the reference plan recalculated on the CBCT scan and were compared with adaptive plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reference bladder volume in the planning CT scan was 173 cc, and the mean bladder volume difference over the course was 25.4% ± 16.6%. The ART offered superior target coverage for PTV 70 Gy over online IGRT (V95: 90.5 ± 3.2 % Vs 97.3 ± 0.4%; p=0.000) and the bladder was also better spared from the high dose (V65 Gy: 17.9 ± 9.1% vs 14.8 ± 3.6%; p=0.03). However, the mean rectum V65 doses were very similar in both plans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Managing the inconsistent bladder volume was feasible in the prostate cancer patient using the CBCT-guided OART and our analysis confirmed that adaptive plans offered better target coverage while sparing the bladder from high radiation doses in comparison to online IGRT plans.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>radiotherapy, CBCT, online adaptive radiotherapy, image-guided RT.</p>","PeriodicalId":53633,"journal":{"name":"The gulf journal of oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The gulf journal of oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We report the use of online adaptive radiotherapy (OART) aiming to improve dosimetric parameters in the prostate cancer patient who had lower urinary tract symptoms that caused him not to adhere to the standard bladder filling protocol.

Methods and materials: The reference treatment plan for adaptive radiotherapy plan was generated for the pelvis and the solitary bony lesion using the Ethos treatment planning system. For each treatment session, high-quality iterative reconstructed cone beam CT (CBCT) images were acquired, and the system automatically generated an optimal adaptive plan after verification of contours. Image-guided RT (IGRT) plans were also created using the reference plan recalculated on the CBCT scan and were compared with adaptive plans.

Results: The reference bladder volume in the planning CT scan was 173 cc, and the mean bladder volume difference over the course was 25.4% ± 16.6%. The ART offered superior target coverage for PTV 70 Gy over online IGRT (V95: 90.5 ± 3.2 % Vs 97.3 ± 0.4%; p=0.000) and the bladder was also better spared from the high dose (V65 Gy: 17.9 ± 9.1% vs 14.8 ± 3.6%; p=0.03). However, the mean rectum V65 doses were very similar in both plans.

Conclusion: Managing the inconsistent bladder volume was feasible in the prostate cancer patient using the CBCT-guided OART and our analysis confirmed that adaptive plans offered better target coverage while sparing the bladder from high radiation doses in comparison to online IGRT plans.

Key words: radiotherapy, CBCT, online adaptive radiotherapy, image-guided RT.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用每日在线自适应 RT 管理前列腺癌患者不一致的膀胱容量:病例报告。
目的:我们报告了在线自适应放疗(OART)在前列腺癌患者中的应用情况,该疗法旨在改善剂量学参数,因为前列腺癌患者有下尿路症状,导致其无法坚持标准的膀胱充盈方案:使用 Ethos 治疗计划系统为骨盆和单发骨质病灶生成自适应放疗计划的参考治疗方案。每次治疗均采集高质量的迭代重建锥形束 CT(CBCT)图像,系统在验证轮廓后自动生成最佳自适应计划。图像引导 RT(IGRT)计划也是利用 CBCT 扫描重新计算的参考计划创建的,并与自适应计划进行了比较:结果:规划 CT 扫描中的参考膀胱容积为 173 毫升,疗程中的平均膀胱容积差为 25.4% ± 16.6%。与在线 IGRT 相比,ART 为 PTV 70 Gy 提供了更好的目标覆盖(V95:90.5 ± 3.2 % vs 97.3 ± 0.4%;P=0.000),膀胱也能更好地免受高剂量的影响(V65 Gy:17.9 ± 9.1% vs 14.8 ± 3.6%;P=0.03)。然而,两种方案的直肠V65平均剂量非常相似:我们的分析证实,与在线 IGRT 计划相比,自适应计划提供了更好的目标覆盖范围,同时使膀胱免受高辐射剂量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The gulf journal of oncology
The gulf journal of oncology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Assessing Mismatch Repair Expression by Immunohistochemistry in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma -Insight from a Tertiary Care Centre. Assessment of Radiation Induced Pneumonitis and Pericarditis in Patients Undergoing Breast Conservative Treatment Using Hypofractionated Simultaneous Integrated Boost Technique. Comparison of Acute Toxicities, Overall Treatment Time and Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated with IMRT and Helical Tomotherapy. Cost of Healthcare Services in Geriatric Neuro-oncology: A descriptive Analysis. Establishing and Monitoring an Effective Management of Benign Nontoxic Multinodular Goitre in Kuwait "Utilizing Two Different Dose Levels of Recombinant Human TSH in Combination with Radioactive Iodine".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1