The Effect of the Presence of Barrier during Resternotomy in Congenital Heart Surgery.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Acta Cardiologica Sinica Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.6515/ACS.202405_40(3).20231129A
Onur Isik, Muhammet Akyuz, Gökcen Ozcifci, Gokmen Akkaya, Fatih Durak, Ayse Berna Anil
{"title":"The Effect of the Presence of Barrier during Resternotomy in Congenital Heart Surgery.","authors":"Onur Isik, Muhammet Akyuz, Gökcen Ozcifci, Gokmen Akkaya, Fatih Durak, Ayse Berna Anil","doi":"10.6515/ACS.202405_40(3).20231129A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reoperation is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in congenital heart surgery. The aim of this study was to assess whether the presence of barrier during resternotomy affected the outcomes of infants and children who underwent congenital heart surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 110 (7.6%) patients who underwent reoperations among 1445 consecutive patients between February 2018 and June 2023 were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups: those with barrier (n = 72) and those without barrier (n = 38). Demographic, intraoperative and postoperative data were retrospectively analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 110 patients, the age at reoperation was 10.1 ± 1.4 years in the group with barrier and 10.9 ± 2.8 years in the group without barrier. There were no statistically significant differences in the age at surgery, preoperative saturation, interval since preceding surgery (years), and aortic cross clamp time (minutes) between the groups. However, there were significantly higher rates of injuries during dissection (p = 0.001) and adverse events (p = 0.002) during dissection in the non-barrier group. One patient in the group without barrier underwent reoperation but subsequently died.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The usage of any barrier in front of the right ventricle can decrease the incidence of adverse events, morbidity and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":6957,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cardiologica Sinica","volume":"40 3","pages":"275-280"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11106619/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Cardiologica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6515/ACS.202405_40(3).20231129A","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reoperation is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in congenital heart surgery. The aim of this study was to assess whether the presence of barrier during resternotomy affected the outcomes of infants and children who underwent congenital heart surgery.

Methods: A total of 110 (7.6%) patients who underwent reoperations among 1445 consecutive patients between February 2018 and June 2023 were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups: those with barrier (n = 72) and those without barrier (n = 38). Demographic, intraoperative and postoperative data were retrospectively analyzed.

Results: Among the 110 patients, the age at reoperation was 10.1 ± 1.4 years in the group with barrier and 10.9 ± 2.8 years in the group without barrier. There were no statistically significant differences in the age at surgery, preoperative saturation, interval since preceding surgery (years), and aortic cross clamp time (minutes) between the groups. However, there were significantly higher rates of injuries during dissection (p = 0.001) and adverse events (p = 0.002) during dissection in the non-barrier group. One patient in the group without barrier underwent reoperation but subsequently died.

Conclusions: The usage of any barrier in front of the right ventricle can decrease the incidence of adverse events, morbidity and mortality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
先天性心脏病手术再狭窄切除术中存在屏障的影响。
背景:再手术是先天性心脏病手术发病率和死亡率的重要原因。本研究旨在评估再切口术中屏障的存在是否会影响接受先天性心脏病手术的婴幼儿的预后:评估了 2018 年 2 月至 2023 年 6 月间连续 1445 例患者中接受再手术的 110 例(7.6%)患者。患者分为两组:有屏障(n = 72)和无屏障(n = 38)。对人口统计学、术中和术后数据进行了回顾性分析:在 110 名患者中,有屏障组患者再次手术时的年龄为 10.1 ± 1.4 岁,无屏障组患者再次手术时的年龄为 10.9 ± 2.8 岁。两组患者的手术年龄、术前饱和度、前次手术间隔时间(年)和主动脉交叉钳夹时间(分钟)差异无统计学意义。不过,无屏障组在解剖过程中受伤的比例(p = 0.001)和发生不良事件的比例(p = 0.002)明显高于无屏障组。无屏障组中有一名患者接受了再次手术,但随后死亡:结论:在右心室前使用任何屏障都能降低不良事件、发病率和死亡率的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Cardiologica Sinica
Acta Cardiologica Sinica 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
15.80%
发文量
144
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Cardiologica Sinica welcomes all the papers in the fields related to cardiovascular medicine including basic research, vascular biology, clinical pharmacology, clinical trial, critical care medicine, coronary artery disease, interventional cardiology, arrythmia and electrophysiology, atherosclerosis, hypertension, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, valvular and structure cardiac disease, pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, and so on. We received papers from more than 20 countries and areas of the world. Currently, 40% of the papers were submitted to Acta Cardiologica Sinica from Taiwan, 20% from China, and 20% from the other countries and areas in the world. The acceptance rate for publication was around 50% in general.
期刊最新文献
18F-Florbetaben PET/CT for the Diagnosis and Subtyping of Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Case Series and Review of the Literature. 2024 Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology on the Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease --- Part I. 2024 Update of the TSOC Expert Consensus of Fabry Disease. A Look is Worth a Thousand Words!! - Case Series of Forearm Compartment Syndrome after Transradial Coronary Intervention. A Strongly Suspected Case of Concomitant Myocarditis in Naegleria fowleri Induced Primary Amoebic Meningoencephalitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1