Prevention at home in older persons with (pre-)frailty: analysis of participants' recruitment and characteristics of the randomized controlled PromeTheus trial.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1007/s40520-024-02775-x
Tim Fleiner, Corinna Nerz, Michael Denkinger, Jürgen M Bauer, Christian Grüneberg, Judith Dams, Martina Schäufele, Gisela Büchele, Kilian Rapp, Christian Werner
{"title":"Prevention at home in older persons with (pre-)frailty: analysis of participants' recruitment and characteristics of the randomized controlled PromeTheus trial.","authors":"Tim Fleiner, Corinna Nerz, Michael Denkinger, Jürgen M Bauer, Christian Grüneberg, Judith Dams, Martina Schäufele, Gisela Büchele, Kilian Rapp, Christian Werner","doi":"10.1007/s40520-024-02775-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The \"PromeTheus\" trial is evaluating a home-based, multifactorial, interdisciplinary prevention program for community-dwelling (pre-)frail older adults. These individuals often suffer from reduced participation, which can complicate the recruitment and enrollment in a clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate different recruitment strategies and differences in participant characteristics in relation to these strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used baseline data from the randomized-controlled PromeTheus trial, in which community-dwelling (pre-)frail older persons (Clinical Frailty Scale [CFS] 4-6 pt., ≥ 70 years) were recruited via general practitioners (\"GP recruitment\") or flyers, newspaper articles, and personalized letters (\"direct recruitment\"). Differences in the sociodemographic, clinical, physical, functional, mobility-related, psychological and social characteristics were analyzed in relation to the recruitment strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 385 participants (mean age = 81.2, SD 5.9 years; women: n = 283, 73.5%) were enrolled, of which 60 (16%) were recruited by GPs and 325 (84%) through direct recruitment. Participants recruited via GPs had significantly higher subjective frailty levels (CFS), were more often physically frail (Fried Frailty Phenotype), and showed lower physical capacity (Short Physical Performance Battery), participation (disability component of the short version of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument), and life-space mobility (Life-Space Assessment) compared to those recruited via the direct approach (p = 0.002-0.026). Costs per randomized participant were 94€ for the GP recruitment strategy and €213 for the direct recruitment strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different strategies may be required to successfully recruit (pre-)frail home-living older adults into preventive programs. Direct recruitment strategies, in which potential participants are directly informed about the prevention program, seem to be more promising than GP recruitment but may result in enrolment of persons with less functional impairment and higher recruitment costs.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00024638. Registered on March 11, 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"36 1","pages":"120"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11116259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-024-02775-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The "PromeTheus" trial is evaluating a home-based, multifactorial, interdisciplinary prevention program for community-dwelling (pre-)frail older adults. These individuals often suffer from reduced participation, which can complicate the recruitment and enrollment in a clinical trial.

Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate different recruitment strategies and differences in participant characteristics in relation to these strategies.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used baseline data from the randomized-controlled PromeTheus trial, in which community-dwelling (pre-)frail older persons (Clinical Frailty Scale [CFS] 4-6 pt., ≥ 70 years) were recruited via general practitioners ("GP recruitment") or flyers, newspaper articles, and personalized letters ("direct recruitment"). Differences in the sociodemographic, clinical, physical, functional, mobility-related, psychological and social characteristics were analyzed in relation to the recruitment strategy.

Results: A total of 385 participants (mean age = 81.2, SD 5.9 years; women: n = 283, 73.5%) were enrolled, of which 60 (16%) were recruited by GPs and 325 (84%) through direct recruitment. Participants recruited via GPs had significantly higher subjective frailty levels (CFS), were more often physically frail (Fried Frailty Phenotype), and showed lower physical capacity (Short Physical Performance Battery), participation (disability component of the short version of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument), and life-space mobility (Life-Space Assessment) compared to those recruited via the direct approach (p = 0.002-0.026). Costs per randomized participant were 94€ for the GP recruitment strategy and €213 for the direct recruitment strategy.

Conclusion: Different strategies may be required to successfully recruit (pre-)frail home-living older adults into preventive programs. Direct recruitment strategies, in which potential participants are directly informed about the prevention program, seem to be more promising than GP recruitment but may result in enrolment of persons with less functional impairment and higher recruitment costs.

Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00024638. Registered on March 11, 2021.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚弱(前期)老年人的居家预防:随机对照 PromeTheus 试验的参与者招募和特点分析。
背景PromeTheus "试验正在评估一项以家庭为基础、多因素、跨学科的预防计划,对象是居住在社区的(前期)体弱老年人。目的:本研究旨在评估不同的招募策略以及与这些策略相关的参与者特征差异:这项横断面研究使用了随机对照试验 PromeTheus 的基线数据,通过全科医生("全科医生招募")或传单、报纸文章和个性化信件("直接招募")招募居住在社区的(前期)体弱老年人(临床体弱量表 [CFS] 4-6 pt.,≥ 70 岁)。分析了与招募策略相关的社会人口学、临床、身体、功能、行动相关、心理和社会特征的差异:共招募了 385 名参与者(平均年龄 = 81.2 岁,标准差 5.9 岁;女性:n = 283,73.5%),其中 60 人(16%)通过全科医生招募,325 人(84%)通过直接招募。与直接招募的参与者相比,通过全科医生招募的参与者主观虚弱程度(CFS)明显更高,身体更加虚弱(弗里德虚弱表型),体能(短期体能测试)、参与度(晚年功能和残疾测试短版的残疾部分)和生活空间活动度(生活空间评估)也更低(p = 0.002-0.026)。全科医生招募策略的每位随机参与者的成本为94欧元,直接招募策略的每位随机参与者的成本为213欧元:结论:要成功招募(前期)体弱的居家老年人参与预防计划,可能需要采取不同的策略。直接招募策略,即直接告知潜在参与者有关预防计划的信息,似乎比全科医生招募更有前景,但可能会导致功能障碍程度较低的人被招募,招募成本较高:试验注册:德国临床试验注册中心,DRKS00024638。注册日期:2021 年 3 月 11 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
期刊最新文献
Disproportionate increase of extreme obesity among older adults: an exploratory analysis from the English longitudinal study of ageing. The association of frailty with health care costs using the FRAIL scale. Combined creatine and β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate supplementation with integral conditioning exercise enhances functional performance and metabolic health in physically active older adults: A randomized controlled crossover trial. Beyond bone effects: the role of denosumab in muscle Health - A systematic review. The efficacy of reminiscence therapy on the cognition of older patients with cognitive impairment or dementia: a meta-analysis based on regulatory factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1