Characteristics of Patients Who Return to the Emergency Department After an Observation Unit Assessment.

IF 1.9 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.15441/ceem.24.192
Barry Hahn, Shannon Sunny, Patrick Kettyle, Jerel Chacko, Dimitre G Stefanov
{"title":"Characteristics of Patients Who Return to the Emergency Department After an Observation Unit Assessment.","authors":"Barry Hahn, Shannon Sunny, Patrick Kettyle, Jerel Chacko, Dimitre G Stefanov","doi":"10.15441/ceem.24.192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency Department observation units (EDOU) transition patients from the emergency department (ED) to dedicated areas where they can receive continuous monitoring. Understanding patient return visits after EDOU discharge is important for optimizing healthcare. The objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between demographic and clinical features and the likelihood of returning to the ED within 30 days following their initial assessment in the EDOU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational cohort study of adult EDOU subjects was conducted between February 1, 2018 - January 31, 2023. Adult patients evaluated in the EDOU and returned to the ED within 30 days were identified. Subjects were compared to those assessed in the EDOU but did not return to the ED within 30 days. The analysis took into account multiple visits by the same subject and made adjustments for variables including gender, ethnicity, insurance status, primary diagnosis, and disposition, using a generalized linear mixed model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14,910 EDOU encounters were analyzed and 2,252 (15%) patients returned to the ED within 30 days. The analysis took into account several variables demonstrated a significant association with the likelihood of returning to the ED within 30 days. These included gender (p=0.0002), ethnicity (p=0.005), race (p=0.0004), insurance status (p<0.0001), primary diagnosis (p<0.0001), and disposition (p<0.001). Emergency severity index and length of stay were not associated with returning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding these factors may guide interventions, enhance EDOU care, and reduce resource strain. Further research should explore these associations and long-term intervention impacts for improved outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.24.192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency Department observation units (EDOU) transition patients from the emergency department (ED) to dedicated areas where they can receive continuous monitoring. Understanding patient return visits after EDOU discharge is important for optimizing healthcare. The objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between demographic and clinical features and the likelihood of returning to the ED within 30 days following their initial assessment in the EDOU.

Methods: This retrospective, observational cohort study of adult EDOU subjects was conducted between February 1, 2018 - January 31, 2023. Adult patients evaluated in the EDOU and returned to the ED within 30 days were identified. Subjects were compared to those assessed in the EDOU but did not return to the ED within 30 days. The analysis took into account multiple visits by the same subject and made adjustments for variables including gender, ethnicity, insurance status, primary diagnosis, and disposition, using a generalized linear mixed model.

Results: A total of 14,910 EDOU encounters were analyzed and 2,252 (15%) patients returned to the ED within 30 days. The analysis took into account several variables demonstrated a significant association with the likelihood of returning to the ED within 30 days. These included gender (p=0.0002), ethnicity (p=0.005), race (p=0.0004), insurance status (p<0.0001), primary diagnosis (p<0.0001), and disposition (p<0.001). Emergency severity index and length of stay were not associated with returning.

Conclusions: Understanding these factors may guide interventions, enhance EDOU care, and reduce resource strain. Further research should explore these associations and long-term intervention impacts for improved outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经过观察室评估后返回急诊科的患者特征。
导言:急诊科观察室(EDOU)将患者从急诊科(ED)转移到可以接受持续监测的专用区域。了解患者出院后的回访情况对于优化医疗服务非常重要。本研究旨在调查人口统计学和临床特征与患者在急诊观察室接受初步评估后 30 天内重返急诊科的可能性之间的相关性:这项针对成人 EDOU 受试者的回顾性观察队列研究于 2018 年 2 月 1 日至 2023 年 1 月 31 日期间进行。研究确定了在 EDOU 中接受评估并在 30 天内返回 ED 的成年患者。受试者与在 EDOU 中接受评估但未在 30 天内返回 ED 的受试者进行了比较。分析考虑了同一受试者多次就诊的情况,并使用广义线性混合模型对性别、种族、保险状况、主要诊断和处置等变量进行了调整:共分析了 14,910 次 EDOU 就诊,其中 2,252 名患者(15%)在 30 天内返回 ED。分析中考虑了几个变量,结果表明这些变量与 30 天内返回急诊室的可能性有显著关联。这些变量包括性别(p=0.0002)、种族(p=0.005)、人种(p=0.0004)、保险状况(p结论:了解这些因素可为干预措施提供指导、加强 EDOU 护理并减轻资源压力。进一步的研究应探讨这些关联和长期干预对改善结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
Acute iodinate contrast medium reaction: look at the CT images! Assessing the efficacy of electrocardiogram for heart rate evaluation during newborn resuscitation at birth: a prospective observational study. Case of multiple acute cerebral infarctions after blunt cerebrovascular injuries. Epidemiology of Deep Venous Thrombosis Among United States Emergency Departments Over an Eight-Year Period. Floating thrombus involving the aortic arch in a woman.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1