Acute Responses to Traditional and Cluster-Set Squat Training With and Without Blood Flow Restriction.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000004820
Pedro J Cornejo-Daza, Juan Sánchez-Valdepeñas, Jose Páez-Maldonado, Luis Rodiles-Guerrero, Daniel Boullosa, Juan A León-Prados, Mathias Wernbom, Fernando Pareja-Blanco
{"title":"Acute Responses to Traditional and Cluster-Set Squat Training With and Without Blood Flow Restriction.","authors":"Pedro J Cornejo-Daza, Juan Sánchez-Valdepeñas, Jose Páez-Maldonado, Luis Rodiles-Guerrero, Daniel Boullosa, Juan A León-Prados, Mathias Wernbom, Fernando Pareja-Blanco","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000004820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Cornejo-Daza, PJ, Sánchez-Valdepeñas, J, Páez-Maldonado, J, Rodiles-Guerrero, L, Boullosa, D, León-Prados, JA, Wernbom, M, and Pareja-Blanco, F. Acute responses to traditional and cluster-set squat training with and without blood flow restriction. J Strength Cond Res 38(8): 1401-1412, 2024-To compare the acute responses to different set configurations (cluster [CLU] vs. traditional [TRA]) under distinct blood flow conditions (free vs. restricted) in full-squat (SQ). Twenty resistance-trained males performed 4 protocols that differed in the set configuration (TRA: continuous repetitions; vs. CLU: 30 seconds of rest every 2 repetitions) and in the blood flow condition (FF: free-flow; vs. blood flow restriction [BFR]: 50% of arterial occlusion pressure). The relative intensity (60% 1RM), volume (3 sets of 8 repetitions), and resting time (2 minutes) were equated. Mean propulsive force (MPF), velocity (MPV) and power (MPP), and electromyography (EMG) parameters were recorded during each repetition. Tensiomyography (TMG), blood lactate, countermovement jump (CMJ) height, maximal voluntary isometric contraction, in SQ, and movement velocity against the load that elicited a 1 m·s -1 velocity at baseline (V1-load) in SQ were assessed at pre- and post-exercise. The CLU protocols allowed a better maintenance of MPF, MPV, MPP, and EMG median frequency during the exercise compared to TRA (clu-time interaction, p < 0.05). The TRA protocols experienced greater impairments post-exercise in TMG- and EMG-derived variables (clu-time interaction, p < 0.05) and SQ and CMJ performance (clu-time interaction, p = 0.08 and p < 0.05, respectively), as well as higher blood lactate concentrations (clu-time interaction, p < 0.001) than CLU. Moreover, BFR displayed decreases in TMG variables (bfr-time interaction, p < 0.01), but BFR-CLU resulted in the greatest reduction in twitch contraction time ( p < 0.001). Cluster sets reduced fatigue during and after the training session and BFR exacerbated impairments in muscle mechanical properties; however, the combination of both could improve contraction speed after exercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11286160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004820","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Cornejo-Daza, PJ, Sánchez-Valdepeñas, J, Páez-Maldonado, J, Rodiles-Guerrero, L, Boullosa, D, León-Prados, JA, Wernbom, M, and Pareja-Blanco, F. Acute responses to traditional and cluster-set squat training with and without blood flow restriction. J Strength Cond Res 38(8): 1401-1412, 2024-To compare the acute responses to different set configurations (cluster [CLU] vs. traditional [TRA]) under distinct blood flow conditions (free vs. restricted) in full-squat (SQ). Twenty resistance-trained males performed 4 protocols that differed in the set configuration (TRA: continuous repetitions; vs. CLU: 30 seconds of rest every 2 repetitions) and in the blood flow condition (FF: free-flow; vs. blood flow restriction [BFR]: 50% of arterial occlusion pressure). The relative intensity (60% 1RM), volume (3 sets of 8 repetitions), and resting time (2 minutes) were equated. Mean propulsive force (MPF), velocity (MPV) and power (MPP), and electromyography (EMG) parameters were recorded during each repetition. Tensiomyography (TMG), blood lactate, countermovement jump (CMJ) height, maximal voluntary isometric contraction, in SQ, and movement velocity against the load that elicited a 1 m·s -1 velocity at baseline (V1-load) in SQ were assessed at pre- and post-exercise. The CLU protocols allowed a better maintenance of MPF, MPV, MPP, and EMG median frequency during the exercise compared to TRA (clu-time interaction, p < 0.05). The TRA protocols experienced greater impairments post-exercise in TMG- and EMG-derived variables (clu-time interaction, p < 0.05) and SQ and CMJ performance (clu-time interaction, p = 0.08 and p < 0.05, respectively), as well as higher blood lactate concentrations (clu-time interaction, p < 0.001) than CLU. Moreover, BFR displayed decreases in TMG variables (bfr-time interaction, p < 0.01), but BFR-CLU resulted in the greatest reduction in twitch contraction time ( p < 0.001). Cluster sets reduced fatigue during and after the training session and BFR exacerbated impairments in muscle mechanical properties; however, the combination of both could improve contraction speed after exercise.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在血流受限和不受限的情况下,对传统深蹲训练和集群深蹲训练的急性反应。
摘要:Cornejo-Daza, PJ、Sánchez-Valdepeñas, J、Páez-Maldonado, J、Rodiles-Guerrero, L、Boullosa, D、León-Prados, JA、Wernbom, M和Pareja-Blanco, F.对有和无血流限制的传统和集群深蹲训练的急性反应。J Strength Cond Res XX(X):000-000,2024--比较在不同血流条件(自由血流与限制血流)下全蹲(SQ)对不同组套配置(集群[CLU]与传统[TRA])的急性反应。20 名阻力训练的男性进行了 4 个不同组合配置的训练方案(TRA:连续重复;CLU:每 2 次重复休息 30 秒):血流条件(FF:自由血流;VS.血流限制 [BFR]:50%的动脉闭塞压)。相对强度(60% 1RM)、运动量(3 组,每组 8 次)和休息时间(2 分钟)均相同。每次重复时记录平均推进力(MPF)、速度(MPV)和功率(MPP)以及肌电图(EMG)参数。在运动前和运动后对腱肌(TMG)、血乳酸、反运动跳跃(CMJ)高度、最大自主等长收缩(SQ)和运动速度(SQ)与基线时产生 1 m-s-1 速度的负荷(V1-负荷)进行了评估。与 TRA 相比,CLU 方案在运动过程中能更好地保持 MPF、MPV、MPP 和 EMG 中位频率(clu-time 交互作用,p < 0.05)。与 CLU 相比,TRA 方案在运动后对 TMG 和 EMG 衍生变量(群时间交互作用,p < 0.05)、SQ 和 CMJ 性能(群时间交互作用,分别为 p = 0.08 和 p < 0.05)以及较高的血乳酸浓度(群时间交互作用,p < 0.001)造成的损害更大。此外,BFR 显示出 TMG 变量的减少(bfr-时间交互作用,p < 0.01),但 BFR-CLU 导致抽动收缩时间的最大减少(p < 0.001)。集群组降低了训练过程中和训练结束后的疲劳程度,而 BFR 则加剧了肌肉机械特性的损伤;不过,两者结合使用可提高运动后的收缩速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
期刊最新文献
Does Cathodal Preconditioning Enhance the Effects of Subsequent Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability and Grip Strength? Evaluation of Trunk Oblique Muscle Activities in Baseball Batters Using T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Frequency of Velocity-Based-Training Frequency Impacts Changes in Muscle Morphology, Neuromuscular Performance, and Functional Capability in Persons With Parkinson's Disease. Position-Specific Differences in Speed Profiles Among National Football League Scouting Combine Participants. Prediction of Snatch and Clean and Jerk Performance From Physical Performance Measures in Elite Male Weightlifters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1