Ioannis Doundoulakis, Sotirios Chiotis, Luigi Pannone, Domenico Giovanni Della Rocca, Antonio Sorgente, Athanasios Kordalis, Roberto Scacciavillani, Stefanos Zafeiropoulos, Lorenzo Marcon, Giampaolo Vetta, Eirini Pagkalidou, Gezim Bala, Alexandre Almorad, Erwin Ströker, Juan Sieira, Mark La Meir, Pedro Brugada, Dimitrios Tsiachris, Andrea Sarkozy, Gian Battista Chierchia, Carlo de Asmundis
{"title":"Catheter ablation as an adjunctive therapy to ICD implantation in Brugada Syndrome.","authors":"Ioannis Doundoulakis, Sotirios Chiotis, Luigi Pannone, Domenico Giovanni Della Rocca, Antonio Sorgente, Athanasios Kordalis, Roberto Scacciavillani, Stefanos Zafeiropoulos, Lorenzo Marcon, Giampaolo Vetta, Eirini Pagkalidou, Gezim Bala, Alexandre Almorad, Erwin Ströker, Juan Sieira, Mark La Meir, Pedro Brugada, Dimitrios Tsiachris, Andrea Sarkozy, Gian Battista Chierchia, Carlo de Asmundis","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brugada Syndrome (BrS) is a life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia disorder associated with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and sudden cardiac death. Current management primarily relies on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), but patients may experience ICD shocks. Catheter ablation (CA) has emerged as a potential intervention to target the arrhythmogenic substrate. This systematic review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CA in BrS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Studies with BrS patients undergoing CA for VAs were included. Fourteen studies that involved a total population of 709 BrS patients, with CA performed in 528 of them, were included. CA resulted in the non-inducibility of VAs in 91% (95% CI: 83-99, I2 = 76%) and resolution of type 1 ECG Brugada pattern in 88% (95% CI: 81-96.2, I2 = 91%) of the patients. After a mean follow-up of 30.7 months, 87% (95% CI: 80-94, I2 = 82%) of patients remained free from VAs. The incidence of VAs during follow-up was significantly lower in the ablation cohort in comparison to the group receiving only ICD therapy (OR = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.01-0.12, I2 = 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CA shows potential as a therapeutic approach to reduce VAs and improve outcomes in BrS patients. While further research with a long follow-up period is required to confirm these findings, it represents a valuable tool as an add-on intervention to ICD implantation in BrS patients with a high burden of VAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"590-601"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Brugada Syndrome (BrS) is a life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia disorder associated with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and sudden cardiac death. Current management primarily relies on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), but patients may experience ICD shocks. Catheter ablation (CA) has emerged as a potential intervention to target the arrhythmogenic substrate. This systematic review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CA in BrS patients.
Methods and results: Studies with BrS patients undergoing CA for VAs were included. Fourteen studies that involved a total population of 709 BrS patients, with CA performed in 528 of them, were included. CA resulted in the non-inducibility of VAs in 91% (95% CI: 83-99, I2 = 76%) and resolution of type 1 ECG Brugada pattern in 88% (95% CI: 81-96.2, I2 = 91%) of the patients. After a mean follow-up of 30.7 months, 87% (95% CI: 80-94, I2 = 82%) of patients remained free from VAs. The incidence of VAs during follow-up was significantly lower in the ablation cohort in comparison to the group receiving only ICD therapy (OR = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.01-0.12, I2 = 0%).
Conclusion: CA shows potential as a therapeutic approach to reduce VAs and improve outcomes in BrS patients. While further research with a long follow-up period is required to confirm these findings, it represents a valuable tool as an add-on intervention to ICD implantation in BrS patients with a high burden of VAs.
期刊介绍:
European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.