Using a new artificial intelligence-aided method to assess body composition CT segmentation in colorectal cancer patients

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1002/jmrs.798
Ke Cao PhD (Melb), Josephine Yeung BPharm (Hons), Yasser Arafat MS (Usyd), FRACS, Jing Qiao MD, Richard Gartrell MS, FRACS, Mobin Master FRANZCR, MBBS, Justin M. C. Yeung DM, FRACS, Paul N. Baird PhD (Lond)
{"title":"Using a new artificial intelligence-aided method to assess body composition CT segmentation in colorectal cancer patients","authors":"Ke Cao PhD (Melb),&nbsp;Josephine Yeung BPharm (Hons),&nbsp;Yasser Arafat MS (Usyd), FRACS,&nbsp;Jing Qiao MD,&nbsp;Richard Gartrell MS, FRACS,&nbsp;Mobin Master FRANZCR, MBBS,&nbsp;Justin M. C. Yeung DM, FRACS,&nbsp;Paul N. Baird PhD (Lond)","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of our own artificial intelligence (AI)-generated model to assess automated segmentation and quantification of body composition-derived computed tomography (CT) slices from the lumber (L3) region in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 541 axial CT slices at the L3 vertebra were retrospectively collected from 319 patients with CRC diagnosed during 2012–2019 at a single Australian tertiary institution, Western Health in Melbourne. A two-dimensional U-Net convolutional network was trained on 338 slices to segment muscle, visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Manual reading of these same slices of muscle, VAT and SAT was created to serve as ground truth data. The Dice similarity coefficient was used to assess the U-Net-based segmentation performance on both a validation dataset (68 slices) and a test dataset (203 slices). The measurement of cross-sectional area and Hounsfield unit (HU) density of muscle, VAT and SAT were compared between two methods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The segmentation for muscle, VAT and SAT demonstrated excellent performance for both the validation (Dice similarity coefficients &gt;0.98, respectively) and test (Dice similarity coefficients &gt;0.97, respectively) datasets. There was a strong positive correlation between manual and AI segmentation measurements of body composition for both datasets (Spearman's correlation coefficients: 0.944–0.999, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Compared to the gold standard, this fully automated segmentation system exhibited a high accuracy for assessing segmentation and quantification of abdominal muscle and adipose tissues of CT slices at the L3 in CRC patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":"71 4","pages":"519-528"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmrs.798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of our own artificial intelligence (AI)-generated model to assess automated segmentation and quantification of body composition-derived computed tomography (CT) slices from the lumber (L3) region in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

Methods

A total of 541 axial CT slices at the L3 vertebra were retrospectively collected from 319 patients with CRC diagnosed during 2012–2019 at a single Australian tertiary institution, Western Health in Melbourne. A two-dimensional U-Net convolutional network was trained on 338 slices to segment muscle, visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Manual reading of these same slices of muscle, VAT and SAT was created to serve as ground truth data. The Dice similarity coefficient was used to assess the U-Net-based segmentation performance on both a validation dataset (68 slices) and a test dataset (203 slices). The measurement of cross-sectional area and Hounsfield unit (HU) density of muscle, VAT and SAT were compared between two methods.

Results

The segmentation for muscle, VAT and SAT demonstrated excellent performance for both the validation (Dice similarity coefficients >0.98, respectively) and test (Dice similarity coefficients >0.97, respectively) datasets. There was a strong positive correlation between manual and AI segmentation measurements of body composition for both datasets (Spearman's correlation coefficients: 0.944–0.999, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Compared to the gold standard, this fully automated segmentation system exhibited a high accuracy for assessing segmentation and quantification of abdominal muscle and adipose tissues of CT slices at the L3 in CRC patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用新的人工智能辅助方法评估结直肠癌患者的身体成分 CT 分割。
简介本研究旨在评估我们自己的人工智能(AI)生成模型的准确性,以评估对结直肠癌(CRC)患者腰椎(L3)区域的人体成分计算机断层扫描(CT)切片进行自动分割和量化的情况:澳大利亚一家三级医疗机构--墨尔本西区医疗中心(Western Health)在2012-2019年期间从319名确诊为CRC的患者中回顾性收集了L3椎体处的541张轴向CT切片。在 338 张切片上训练了一个二维 U-Net 卷积网络,以分割肌肉、内脏脂肪组织 (VAT) 和皮下脂肪组织 (SAT)。对这些相同的肌肉、内脏脂肪组织和皮下脂肪组织切片进行了人工读取,作为基本真实数据。在验证数据集(68 张切片)和测试数据集(203 张切片)上使用 Dice 相似性系数评估基于 U-Net 的分割性能。比较了两种方法对肌肉、VAT 和 SAT 横截面面积和 Hounsfield 单位(HU)密度的测量结果:在验证数据集(Dice相似度系数分别大于0.98)和测试数据集(Dice相似度系数分别大于0.97)中,对肌肉、增值血管和SAT的分割都表现出色。在两个数据集上,人工和人工智能对身体成分的分割测量结果之间存在很强的正相关性(斯皮尔曼相关系数:0.944-0.999):0.944-0.999, P 结论):与金标准相比,该全自动分割系统在评估 CRC 患者 L3 CT 切片中腹部肌肉和脂肪组织的分割和量化方面具有很高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).
期刊最新文献
A Comprehensive Review on the Application of Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Postsurgical Recurrence Risk in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Computed Tomography, Positron Emission Tomography, and Clinical Data. Exploring MRI Safety Knowledge Among Physicians and Nurses in Saudi Arabia: Highlighting Knowledge Gaps and Key Influencing Factors. Impact of Pre-Examination Video Education in Gd-EOB-DTPA-Enhanced Liver MRI: Correspondence. The ongoing impact of COVID-19 on the clinical education of Australian medical radiation science students. Evaluating Proton Versus Photon Therapy: A Call for Nuanced Decision-Making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1