Amelia C Warden, Christopher D Wickens, Benjamin A Clegg, Francisco R Ortega
{"title":"Quantitative effects of overlay clutter and information access effort: Examining the scan-clutter trade-off in displays with geospatial maps.","authors":"Amelia C Warden, Christopher D Wickens, Benjamin A Clegg, Francisco R Ortega","doi":"10.1037/xap0000512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Overlaying images from multiple geospatial databases increases clutter and imposes attentional costs by disrupting focusing attention on each database and dividing attention when comparing databases. Costs of overlay clutter may offset the benefits of reduced scanning between two images displayed separately. In two experiments, we examine these attention issues using computational metrics to quantify clutter. We also examine how the scan-clutter trade-off is modified by different levels of clutter, display separation, and task attentional requirements. Participants viewed information from a geographical terrain database and a schematic map database and made judgments that required focusing attention on either database or integrating information across both. In Experiment 1, databases were presented as either overlaid or adjacent displays, and in Experiment 2, as either overlay, adjacent, or more separated displays. Results showed that response time was modulated by the magnitude of clutter, spatial separation, and task type. Results also revealed that clutter costs dominated those of spatial separation, particularly in tasks requiring focused attention. A computational feature congestion metric of clutter effectively predicted performance but could be improved by incorporating an overlay component, which amplified the costs of clutter. The results provide design guidelines for overlay displays (e.g., head-mounted displays) that will minimize the scan-clutter trade-off. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000512","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Overlaying images from multiple geospatial databases increases clutter and imposes attentional costs by disrupting focusing attention on each database and dividing attention when comparing databases. Costs of overlay clutter may offset the benefits of reduced scanning between two images displayed separately. In two experiments, we examine these attention issues using computational metrics to quantify clutter. We also examine how the scan-clutter trade-off is modified by different levels of clutter, display separation, and task attentional requirements. Participants viewed information from a geographical terrain database and a schematic map database and made judgments that required focusing attention on either database or integrating information across both. In Experiment 1, databases were presented as either overlaid or adjacent displays, and in Experiment 2, as either overlay, adjacent, or more separated displays. Results showed that response time was modulated by the magnitude of clutter, spatial separation, and task type. Results also revealed that clutter costs dominated those of spatial separation, particularly in tasks requiring focused attention. A computational feature congestion metric of clutter effectively predicted performance but could be improved by incorporating an overlay component, which amplified the costs of clutter. The results provide design guidelines for overlay displays (e.g., head-mounted displays) that will minimize the scan-clutter trade-off. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
将多个地理空间数据库的图像叠加在一起会增加杂乱度,并在比较数据库时扰乱对每个数据库的集中注意力并分散注意力,从而产生注意力成本。叠加杂乱的成本可能会抵消分别显示的两幅图像之间减少扫描所带来的好处。在两个实验中,我们使用计算指标来量化杂波,从而研究了这些注意力问题。我们还研究了扫描与杂乱之间的权衡如何因不同程度的杂乱、显示分离和任务注意力要求而改变。受试者观看来自地理地形数据库和示意地图数据库的信息,并做出需要将注意力集中在其中一个数据库或整合两个数据库信息的判断。在实验 1 中,数据库以叠加或相邻显示的形式呈现;在实验 2 中,数据库以叠加、相邻或更多分离显示的形式呈现。结果显示,反应时间受杂乱程度、空间隔离和任务类型的影响。实验结果还显示,杂波的成本高于空间分隔的成本,尤其是在需要集中注意力的任务中。杂波的计算特征拥塞度量可以有效地预测成绩,但如果加入叠加组件,则可以提高成绩,因为叠加组件会放大杂波的成本。研究结果为叠加显示器(如头戴式显示器)的设计提供了指导,从而最大限度地减少扫描与杂波之间的权衡。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
期刊介绍:
The mission of the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied® is to publish original empirical investigations in experimental psychology that bridge practically oriented problems and psychological theory. The journal also publishes research aimed at developing and testing of models of cognitive processing or behavior in applied situations, including laboratory and field settings. Occasionally, review articles are considered for publication if they contribute significantly to important topics within applied experimental psychology. Areas of interest include applications of perception, attention, memory, decision making, reasoning, information processing, problem solving, learning, and skill acquisition.